0% found this document useful (0 votes)
355 views2 pages

AQA A Level Law Assessment On Law On Nonfatal Offences

The document discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the current law on non-fatal offences against the person under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. It outlines some key issues, such as ambiguous terminology and illogical sentencing structures. The Law Commission proposed replacing the existing offences with four new offences to improve clarity of meaning and proportionality of sentencing. The reforms aimed to simplify and rationalize the law by clearly defining the required mental states for different levels of injury.

Uploaded by

Jonathan Smith
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
355 views2 pages

AQA A Level Law Assessment On Law On Nonfatal Offences

The document discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the current law on non-fatal offences against the person under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. It outlines some key issues, such as ambiguous terminology and illogical sentencing structures. The Law Commission proposed replacing the existing offences with four new offences to improve clarity of meaning and proportionality of sentencing. The reforms aimed to simplify and rationalize the law by clearly defining the required mental states for different levels of injury.

Uploaded by

Jonathan Smith
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Assessment on law on Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person How to write: A) B) C) D) a) : b) Strengths Weaknesses The vocabulary (e.g.

OAPA1861 maliciously, grievous) is old fashioned and sometimes confusing The meaning of assault if ambiguous and has a narrow technical meaning Victim apprehends immediate unlawful personal violence but broad meaning in s47 meaning assault or battery. There is no logic in the numbering of offences in OAPA S18 and 20 contain two separate offences (wound and gbh). Wounding can be relatively minor and yet s18/20 very serious offence. The sentencing is illogical s47 & 20 have the same maximum sentence for two very different offences, and even though in practice judges give heavier sentences for s20 this should be layed out clearer It is uncertain whether consent is a defence or merely an element of the offence itself even judges disagree (Lords Jauncey,Templeman and Lowry say defence, Lords Mustill and Slynn as a factor negativing the actus reus. Mens rea for s18 can be recklessness when resisting arrest (Morrison). This appears harsh as s18 is a very serious offence whereas recklessness is a low level of mens rea. S20 uses inflicting for gbh, s18 causing. Although in both Wilson and Burstow it was decided that there was no difference this can still be confusing. Briefly outline relevant current law Discuss strengths and weaknesses Identify proposals for reform Discuss how these reforms would improve the law

Of Clarity
Meaning of assault in s47 OAPA 1861 consistently interpreted to mean assault or battery The House of Lords decision in R v Savage mens rea is clear intent/recklessness for initial assault, but not for the harm The conflict between inflict(s20) and cause (s18) has been resolved. Inflict = Cause.

Of the Development
Battery has been developed to include indirect batteries (Haystead) & omissions (SantaBermudez)

Abh adapted to deal with new/rare circumstances e.g. psychiatric harm (chan-fook) and hair (DPPvSmith)

GBH has developed to meet new circumstances, inc serious psychiatric harm (Burstow) and serious biological harm (Dica) The actus reus of gbh recognizes age of the victim as a relevant factor (Bollom) and the possible cumulative effect of a series of minor injuries (Brown & Stratton)

C) Law commissions report no. 218 proposed 4 new offences. 1. Replace assault & battery with a single new offence of assault that includes both elements (ie adopting the broader definition of assault in s47) 2. Replace s47 abh with the offence of intentional or reckless injury, with the mens rea needed for the injury caused. 3. Replace s20 with reckless serious injury. Mens rea (recklessness) needed for the serious injury. 4. Replace s18 with intentional serious injury. Resisting arrest disappears. The Law commission also notes that it would abolish the offence of wounding, and would place any wound in part b) c) or d) depending on the seriousness of the injury and mens rea.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy