Proximate Analysis
Proximate Analysis
protein , crude fat, crude fiber, ash, total lipids and total sugars.
Determination of moisture defines the dry matter composition of food. Determination of moisture content based on physical removal of water
Applicable in most foods except those rich in sugar and fat causes caramelization of sugars and degradation of unsaturated fats. Sample is heated in an oven at 105
Method used for protein determination through total nitrogen. Uses Selenium mixture as catalyst. Adds Sodium thiosulphate in the solution to prevent and break ammonium and catalyst complex
Oxidation of oxygen and hydrogen into carbon dioxide and water. Conversion of bound nitrogen into ammonium ion. Results in colorless solution.
(NH4)2SO4 is distilled with NaOH which is then converted to ammonia. Consequently, the generated gas is trapped in Boric acid upon distillation. (NH4)2SO4(aq) + 2NaOH Na2SO4(aq) + 2H2O(l) + 2NH3(g) B(OH)3 + NH3 NH4+ + H2BO3
The generated ammonium ion is in equilibrium with boric acid, thus titration with acid (HCl) of the boric acid gives the amount of total nitrogen present in the sample. H2BO3 + H3O+ + B(OH)3(aq) + H2O
Continuous solvent extraction method Solvent continuously boils over sample held in ceramic thimble. Extracts lipids through non-polar solvents like diethyl ether, hexane, petroleum ether or methylene chloride
Extraction times range from 4-16 hrs Solvent is removed by evaporation Fat content is measured by weight loss of the sample or by weight of fat removed.
Weende Method
Developed in 1884 by Hennenburg and Stohman for determiation on crude fiber. Uses boiling sulphuric acid to to separate fiber from other component by hyrolyzing carbohydrates and other protein components.
Uses Sodium hydroxide as alkali slution for saponifying remaining lipids and dissolving remaining minerals. Sample is ignited at 600o to oxidize fiber.
Gives an index of total mineral content of the sample Can detect possible adulterations in the sample such as soil, salt, dirt etc.
Sample is ignited at 600o until white ash. Ash content is determined through difference in sample weight.
Moisture content
Weight of container + sample, g Constant wt. of sample upon drying, g 25.6852 25.614 28.1863 28.1188
0.277 % 0. 2563 %
n/a
0.2394 %
ASh
Weight of container + sample, g Constant wt. of sample upon ignition, g 23.0186 22.7328 26.4774 25.2412
8.1202% 6.1577%
7.333%
4.195%
Crude Fat
Weight of sample, g Constant wt. of goldfisch beaker, g 1.0077 54.0026 1.0103 63.7501
54.0618 5.875 %
5.669% 7.667%
63.8053 5.464%
Crude Fiber
Weight of sample, g Constant wt. of sample before ignition, g 0.2980 25.5280 0.2960 17.6608
25.5186 3.1543 %
2.584% 6.333%
17.6546 2.0946 %
Crude Protein
Weight of sample, g Normality of HCl, N 0.1012 0.1010 0.1009 0.1010
0.1022 2.373 %
14.00 % 14.53% 12.oo%
2.554 %
15.07 %
Total Sugars
Weight of sample, g Absorbance reading at 490 nm (corrected) 0.0515 0.026 0.0498 0.032
57.4667 60.8619
66.67%
64.2570
Total Phosphorus
Weight of sample, g Absorbance reading at 490 nm (corrected) 1.1858 0.619 1.2900 0.734
16.129 17.157
n/a
18.186
Conclusion
The experimental value of the Nesvita Cereal Milk drink is almost as close to the literature value cited from the product.
Some errors
For moisture analysis- excess experimental value could be attributed to formation of milliard product (protein:carbohydrate complex) which can be mistaken for moisture loss.
For ash- volatilization of some elements due to hi temperature process For fat- incomplete extraction may have made
For protein slight difference may be due to assumption that all nitrogen present is in the form of protien.
For fiber- acid and base solubilize some of the true fiber (particularly hemicellulose, pectin and lignin) Cellulose too is partially lost. Hence, crude fiber underestimates true fiber.
THE END