0% found this document useful (0 votes)
128 views42 pages

Biology and Crime 4

Many early biological theories of crime proposed physical traits or deficiencies that increased criminality. Lombroso argued "born criminals" had traits like low foreheads. Later theories examined factors like somatotypes. Modern research studies neurological, genetic, and hormonal factors, but finds they only contribute to criminality in certain environments. Biological factors are complex and cannot alone explain criminal behavior.

Uploaded by

creash1981
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
128 views42 pages

Biology and Crime 4

Many early biological theories of crime proposed physical traits or deficiencies that increased criminality. Lombroso argued "born criminals" had traits like low foreheads. Later theories examined factors like somatotypes. Modern research studies neurological, genetic, and hormonal factors, but finds they only contribute to criminality in certain environments. Biological factors are complex and cannot alone explain criminal behavior.

Uploaded by

creash1981
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 42

CHAT: BIOLOGY AND CRIME

EARLY BIOLOGICAL THEORIES (1 OF 2)


Early history of criminology (many early criminologists were physicians) Theory: the presence of certain physical traits makes criminal behavior more likely

EARLY BIOLOGICAL THEORIES (2 OF 2)


1. Phrenology 2. Lombrosos born criminal 3. Physical deficiencies 4. The XYY supermale 5. Somatotype theory

PHRENOLOGY
Exterior of the skull reflects the mind Bumps on the head indicate criminal tendencies

LOMBROSOS BORN CRIMINAL (1


OF 3)

Cesare Lombroso
19th-century Italian physician Led the movement from classical school to scientific positivism Major contributions
Study of the individual offender and crime conditions Application of statistical methods to data collection and analysis, as well as multiple-factor analysis Use of typological methods to classify and study criminals and examine criminological phenomena

LOMBROSOS BORN CRIMINAL (2


OF 3)

Atavism
Criminals as amoral, not fully evolved Physical traits
Low foreheads Broad noses

Small cranial capacities

LOMBROSOS BORN CRIMINAL (3


OF 3)

Types of criminals
Insane
Idiots, drug addicts, moral degenerates

Criminaloids
Those who have physical stigmatas and whose moral degeneracy is less pronounced

Criminals by passion
Passion (like love, hate, honor) fueled their criminal rage

PHYSICAL DEFICIENCIES

Charles Goring
Criminal behavior related to defective intelligence

Earnest Hooten
Criminals physiologically inferior Physical traits
Low foreheads Pinched noses Compressed faces Narrow jaws

SOMATOTYPE THEORY (1 OF 3)

Developed by William Sheldon (supported by the Gluecks at Harvard) Body build (somatotype) linked to:
Behavioral tendencies Temperament Life expectancy Susceptibility to disease

SOMATOTYPE THEORY (2 OF 3)

Basic body types


Endomorph
Fat, soft, and round Tend to be extroverts

Ectomorph
Thin and wiry Easily worried, sensitive, and introverted

Mesomorph (most criminals)


Muscular Gregarious, aggressive, assertive, and action oriented

SOMATOTYPE THEORY (3 OF 3)

Explanations
Those with muscular builds tend to enjoy the physical activity involved in crime. Mesomorphic body type may have an advantage in the rough-and-tumble activities of street crime. Mesomorph is perceived as a threat and is therefore more likely to be arrested and/or incarcerated.

THE XYY SUPERMALE


Chromosomal abnormality (extra Y chromosome) May be more likely to engage in criminal behavior (but not violent behavior) Extremely rare chromosome structure (less than 0.1% of total male population)

POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF EARLY BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH


Focuses on single factors that cannot be changed Policy solution: remove these individuals from society Eugenicsforced sterilization

MODERN BIOLOGICAL APPROACH


(1 OF 2)

Despite the tarnished legacy, there has been a comeback in biological research in recent years.

MODERN BIOLOGICAL APPROACH


(2 OF 2)

1. Behavioral genetics 2. Biological correlates of criminal behavior 3. Biosocial theory 4. Evolutionary theory (sociobiology)

BEHAVIORAL GENETICS (1 OF 5)
Can criminality be inherited? Family studies Twin studies Adoption studies Molecular genetics

BEHAVIORAL GENETICS (2 OF 5)
Family studies Early studies traced family history (Jukes) Modern studies look at parents crime (Sampson and Laub) Findings: Parental crime consistently predicts childrens criminal behavior. Criticism: Environment could easily explain this finding.

BEHAVIORAL GENETICS (3 OF 5)
Twin studies Compare monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins Findings: MZ twins have higher concordance rates than DZ twins. Criticism:
People may treat MZ twins more similarly MZ twins more likely to share friends (including delinquent peers)

BEHAVIORAL GENETICS (4 OF 5)
Adoption studies Compare criminal record of adopted children with their biological and adoptive parents. Findings: Childrens criminal behavior relates more to biological parents. Criticism: Adoption agencies might have biased placements.

BEHAVIORAL GENETICS (5 OF 5)
Molecular genetics Isolates particular genes that may be related to criminal disposition Helped by Human Genome Project Findings: Some potential genes have been identified (e.g., predisposition for antisocial behavior). Criticism: Any particular gene will have only minimal effect on human behavior.

BIOLOGICAL CORRELATES (1 OF 2)
Physiological differences exist between criminals and noncriminals. A wide range of factors potentially contribute to criminal behavior.

BIOLOGICAL CORRELATES (2 OF 2)
1. Neurological factors 2. Autonomic nervous system 3. Biological harms 4. Hormones

NEUROLOGICAL FACTORS (1 OF 3)

Direct measures of the brain


Prefrontal cortex
Executive functions (e.g., cognition, attention, impulsivity) MRI and PET scans analyze brain structure and activity

Differences in the frontal lobe exist between criminals and noncriminal control groups

NEUROLOGICAL FACTORS (2 OF 3)

Neurochemical measures
Neurotransmitters (like serotonin) allow cells to communicate with each other. Low levels of serotonin are linked with impulsive and aggressive behavior.

NEUROLOGICAL FACTORS (3 OF 3)

Indirect measures
Use IQ and other neuropsychological tests to predict delinquency Test executive functions (which reflect differences in brain functioning) Potentially reflect underlying neurological deficits

AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM


Controls how the body reacts to stimuli (heart rate, gland secretions) Some criminals have lower resting heart rates than noncriminals. Studies of skin conductance (sweat) yield mixed results. Criminals potentially have low levels of arousal.

BIOLOGICAL HARMS (1 OF 3)

Perinatal risks linked with criminality


Smoking (cigarettes, marijuana) Alcohol consumption (fetal alcohol syndrome) Delivery complications Low birth-weight children

More pronounced effect in unstable families

BIOLOGICAL HARMS (2 OF 3)

Environmental toxins Lead exposure


Highly toxic substance (especially for young children) Found in lead paint and leaded gasoline Can cause serious health and behavioral problems Linked to delinquent behavior

BIOLOGICAL HARMS (3 OF 3)

Nutrition and diet


Focus on high levels of sugar and junk food intake Relates to antisocial behavior, irritability Some studies showed that hypoglycemia is linked with violent, impulsive behavior
Not well supported by research

HORMONES

Testosterone (male androgen)


Higher levels linked to antisocial, aggressive behavior

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS)


Relationship to female offending unsupported by research

BIOSOCIAL THEORY
Combinations of environmental and biological risk cause criminal behavior

1. Life-course-persistent offending 2. Personality-based theory 3. Female delinquency

LIFE-COURSE-PERSISTENT OFFENDING

Developed by Terrie Moffitt Adolescent-limited (AL) offenders


Criminal behavior limited to adolescence

Life-course-persistent (LCP) offenders


Chronic offending starts early in life

Caused by neurological deficits and ineffective parenting

PERSONALITY-BASED THEORY
Developed by Hans Eysenck Personality traits driven by underlying biology cause crime. Children with low arousal will be difficult to socialize. In criminal families, low arousal might prevent children from learning criminal behavior.

FEMALE DELINQUENCY
Early onset of puberty is linked to criminal behavior. This is true for girls in coed schools, but not for those in all-girls schools. Conclusion: Girls who start puberty early attract the attention of older, crime-prone males, which may lead to delinquency.

EVOLUTIONARY THEORY (1 OF 2)
Uses principles of evolution to explain modern human behavior Research
Rape Cads and dads theory

Criticism
Difficult if not impossible to test Evidence sometimes runs counter to predictions

EVOLUTIONARY THEORY (2 OF 2)
Rape
Evolutionary processes allow males who are pushy and aggressive in the pursuit of sex to pass on their genes successfully.

Cads and dads theory


Alternative strategies for reproductive success Cadspretend caregivers who really want to reproduce with as many females as possible Dadsinvest time and energy to help nurture and raise offspring

SUMMARY
Many biological factors involved in criminal behavior:
Inherited Results of biological harm

Biological factors contribute to criminality in certain environmental circumstances. Humans may be partially driven toward crime by natural forces beyond their control.

BIOLOGICAL THEORIES CRITICISMS (1 OF 2)


Lombrosian fallacy
Incarcerated persons not representative of criminals in general population Bias from social structure and criminal justice system

BIOLOGICAL THEORIES CRITICISMS (2 OF 2)


Ignores some types of crimes
White-collar Organized Political crime

Focuses on aggression or antisocial behavior in children and street crime in adults

POLICY IMPLICATIONS (1 OF 2)
Fears ethical problems
Biology not necessarily destiny Provide unsound justifications for the control of minority populations New eugenics Gene therapy Discrimination based on presence of biological risk indicators

POLICY IMPLICATIONS (2 OF 2)
Criminality as a public health problem
Prenatal care for at-risk mothers Strengthen environmental counterbalances for children with biological risk indicators

CONCLUSION
Lessons from the biological school are limited to certain crimes and offenders. More research is needed.
Nature vs. nurture relationship Interdisciplinary study with criminologists and physical and medical scientists

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy