Biology and Crime 4
Biology and Crime 4
PHRENOLOGY
Exterior of the skull reflects the mind Bumps on the head indicate criminal tendencies
Cesare Lombroso
19th-century Italian physician Led the movement from classical school to scientific positivism Major contributions
Study of the individual offender and crime conditions Application of statistical methods to data collection and analysis, as well as multiple-factor analysis Use of typological methods to classify and study criminals and examine criminological phenomena
Atavism
Criminals as amoral, not fully evolved Physical traits
Low foreheads Broad noses
Types of criminals
Insane
Idiots, drug addicts, moral degenerates
Criminaloids
Those who have physical stigmatas and whose moral degeneracy is less pronounced
Criminals by passion
Passion (like love, hate, honor) fueled their criminal rage
PHYSICAL DEFICIENCIES
Charles Goring
Criminal behavior related to defective intelligence
Earnest Hooten
Criminals physiologically inferior Physical traits
Low foreheads Pinched noses Compressed faces Narrow jaws
SOMATOTYPE THEORY (1 OF 3)
Developed by William Sheldon (supported by the Gluecks at Harvard) Body build (somatotype) linked to:
Behavioral tendencies Temperament Life expectancy Susceptibility to disease
SOMATOTYPE THEORY (2 OF 3)
Ectomorph
Thin and wiry Easily worried, sensitive, and introverted
SOMATOTYPE THEORY (3 OF 3)
Explanations
Those with muscular builds tend to enjoy the physical activity involved in crime. Mesomorphic body type may have an advantage in the rough-and-tumble activities of street crime. Mesomorph is perceived as a threat and is therefore more likely to be arrested and/or incarcerated.
Despite the tarnished legacy, there has been a comeback in biological research in recent years.
1. Behavioral genetics 2. Biological correlates of criminal behavior 3. Biosocial theory 4. Evolutionary theory (sociobiology)
BEHAVIORAL GENETICS (1 OF 5)
Can criminality be inherited? Family studies Twin studies Adoption studies Molecular genetics
BEHAVIORAL GENETICS (2 OF 5)
Family studies Early studies traced family history (Jukes) Modern studies look at parents crime (Sampson and Laub) Findings: Parental crime consistently predicts childrens criminal behavior. Criticism: Environment could easily explain this finding.
BEHAVIORAL GENETICS (3 OF 5)
Twin studies Compare monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins Findings: MZ twins have higher concordance rates than DZ twins. Criticism:
People may treat MZ twins more similarly MZ twins more likely to share friends (including delinquent peers)
BEHAVIORAL GENETICS (4 OF 5)
Adoption studies Compare criminal record of adopted children with their biological and adoptive parents. Findings: Childrens criminal behavior relates more to biological parents. Criticism: Adoption agencies might have biased placements.
BEHAVIORAL GENETICS (5 OF 5)
Molecular genetics Isolates particular genes that may be related to criminal disposition Helped by Human Genome Project Findings: Some potential genes have been identified (e.g., predisposition for antisocial behavior). Criticism: Any particular gene will have only minimal effect on human behavior.
BIOLOGICAL CORRELATES (1 OF 2)
Physiological differences exist between criminals and noncriminals. A wide range of factors potentially contribute to criminal behavior.
BIOLOGICAL CORRELATES (2 OF 2)
1. Neurological factors 2. Autonomic nervous system 3. Biological harms 4. Hormones
NEUROLOGICAL FACTORS (1 OF 3)
Differences in the frontal lobe exist between criminals and noncriminal control groups
NEUROLOGICAL FACTORS (2 OF 3)
Neurochemical measures
Neurotransmitters (like serotonin) allow cells to communicate with each other. Low levels of serotonin are linked with impulsive and aggressive behavior.
NEUROLOGICAL FACTORS (3 OF 3)
Indirect measures
Use IQ and other neuropsychological tests to predict delinquency Test executive functions (which reflect differences in brain functioning) Potentially reflect underlying neurological deficits
BIOLOGICAL HARMS (1 OF 3)
BIOLOGICAL HARMS (2 OF 3)
BIOLOGICAL HARMS (3 OF 3)
HORMONES
BIOSOCIAL THEORY
Combinations of environmental and biological risk cause criminal behavior
LIFE-COURSE-PERSISTENT OFFENDING
PERSONALITY-BASED THEORY
Developed by Hans Eysenck Personality traits driven by underlying biology cause crime. Children with low arousal will be difficult to socialize. In criminal families, low arousal might prevent children from learning criminal behavior.
FEMALE DELINQUENCY
Early onset of puberty is linked to criminal behavior. This is true for girls in coed schools, but not for those in all-girls schools. Conclusion: Girls who start puberty early attract the attention of older, crime-prone males, which may lead to delinquency.
EVOLUTIONARY THEORY (1 OF 2)
Uses principles of evolution to explain modern human behavior Research
Rape Cads and dads theory
Criticism
Difficult if not impossible to test Evidence sometimes runs counter to predictions
EVOLUTIONARY THEORY (2 OF 2)
Rape
Evolutionary processes allow males who are pushy and aggressive in the pursuit of sex to pass on their genes successfully.
SUMMARY
Many biological factors involved in criminal behavior:
Inherited Results of biological harm
Biological factors contribute to criminality in certain environmental circumstances. Humans may be partially driven toward crime by natural forces beyond their control.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS (1 OF 2)
Fears ethical problems
Biology not necessarily destiny Provide unsound justifications for the control of minority populations New eugenics Gene therapy Discrimination based on presence of biological risk indicators
POLICY IMPLICATIONS (2 OF 2)
Criminality as a public health problem
Prenatal care for at-risk mothers Strengthen environmental counterbalances for children with biological risk indicators
CONCLUSION
Lessons from the biological school are limited to certain crimes and offenders. More research is needed.
Nature vs. nurture relationship Interdisciplinary study with criminologists and physical and medical scientists