Metallgesellschaft was a German oil company that sold long-term fixed-price supply contracts to customers. To hedge against risk from fluctuating oil prices, it took long positions in short-term futures contracts. However, when oil prices crashed, Metallgesellschaft faced billions in margin calls due to the strategy. Realizing gains from the contracts was long-term but losses from the hedges were immediate, creating a cash flow problem and funding crisis for the company.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
128 views5 pages
Metallgesellschaft: Hedging Gone Awry
Metallgesellschaft was a German oil company that sold long-term fixed-price supply contracts to customers. To hedge against risk from fluctuating oil prices, it took long positions in short-term futures contracts. However, when oil prices crashed, Metallgesellschaft faced billions in margin calls due to the strategy. Realizing gains from the contracts was long-term but losses from the hedges were immediate, creating a cash flow problem and funding crisis for the company.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5
METALLGESELLSCHAFT :
HEDGING GONE AWRY
OVERVIEW OF THE CASE ……
Metallgesellschaft was a German based oil Refining &
Marketing Company.
MG sold 5-year and 10-year fixed-price oil supply contracts
to customers at 6to 8 cents above market prices.
MG then purchased short-term energy futures to hedge the
long-term commitments – a "stack" hedging strategy
It hedged its exposure with long positions in short dated
futures contract that were rolling forward . As the oil prices crashed, leading to billion dollars of margin call to be met in cash. The Company was faced with temporary funds crunch. The member of MG who devised the strategy argued that: if oil prices dropped, the hedge would lose money while the fixed-rate position increases in value; if oil prices rose, the hedge gains would offset the losses on the fixed-rate position. MG management and bankers , disagreeing with the strategy, decided to close out the positions to curtail further losses. Thus, the company cashed in its positions at a loss totaling over $1.33 billion. WHAT WENT WRONG ? The problem is that when oil prices drop, the gains from the sale of the oil are realized over the long-term, but the losses on the hedges will be realized immediately as margin calls come in. This creates a negative cash flow, leading to a funding crisis .