100% found this document useful (4 votes)
907 views52 pages

Pressure Relief Safety Valves

This document discusses pressure relief systems. It begins by explaining the hazards of overpressure due to equipment failures, human error, or external events. It then discusses potential lines of defense like inherently safe design, passive controls like overdesign, and active controls like relief systems. The document goes on to define relief systems and explain why they are used. It provides terminology related to pressure and outlines code requirements for relief systems. Finally, it discusses the methodology for designing relief systems, including locating reliefs, choosing relief types, developing scenarios, sizing reliefs, and choosing the worst case design.

Uploaded by

wah_ma
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (4 votes)
907 views52 pages

Pressure Relief Safety Valves

This document discusses pressure relief systems. It begins by explaining the hazards of overpressure due to equipment failures, human error, or external events. It then discusses potential lines of defense like inherently safe design, passive controls like overdesign, and active controls like relief systems. The document goes on to define relief systems and explain why they are used. It provides terminology related to pressure and outlines code requirements for relief systems. Finally, it discusses the methodology for designing relief systems, including locating reliefs, choosing relief types, developing scenarios, sizing reliefs, and choosing the worst case design.

Uploaded by

wah_ma
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 52

Pressure Relief

“Grace under pressure”


– Ernest Hemingway

Harry J. Toups LSU Department of Chemical Engineering with


significant material from SACHE 2003 Workshop presentation
by Scott Ostrowski (ExxonMobil)
and Professor Emeritus Art Sterling

1/51
What is the Hazard?
 Despite safety precautions …

– Equipment failures
– Human error, and
– External events, can sometimes lead to …

 Increases in process pressures beyond safe


levels, potentially resulting in …

 OVERPRESSURE due to a RELIEF EVENT

2/51
What are Relief Events?
 External fire
 Flow from high pressure source
 Heat input from associated equipment
 Pumps and compressors
 Ambient heat transfer
 Liquid expansion in pipes and surge

3/51
Potential Lines of Defense
 Inherently Safe Design
– Low pressure processes

 Passive Control
– Overdesign of process equipment

 Active Control
– Install Relief Systems
4/51
What is a Relief System?
 A relief device, and

 Associated lines and process


equipment to safely handle the material
ejected

5/51
Why Use a Relief System?
 Inherently Safe Design simply can’t
eliminate every pressure hazard

 Passive designs can be exceedingly


expensive and cumbersome

 Relief systems work!

6/51
Pressure Terminology
 MAWP
 Design pressure
 Operating
pressure
 Set pressure
 Overpressure
 Accumulation
 Blowdown

7/51
Code Requirements
General Code requirements include:
– ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes
– ASME B31.3 / Petroleum Refinery Piping
– ASME B16.5 / Flanges & Flanged Fittings

8/51
Code Requirements
Relieving pressure shall not exceed
MAWP (accumulation) by more than:
– 3% for fired and unfired steam boilers
– 10% for vessels equipped with a single
pressure relief device
– 16% for vessels equipped with multiple
pressure relief devices
– 21% for fire contingency

9/51
Relief Design Methodology
LOCATE
RELIEFS
CHOOSE
TYPE
DEVELOP
SCENARIOS
SIZE RELIEFS
(1 or 2 Phase)
CHOOSE
WORST CASE
DESIGN RELIEF
SYSTEM
10/51
Locating Reliefs – Where?
 All vessels
 Blocked in sections of cool liquid lines
that are exposed to heat
 Discharge sides of positive
displacement pumps, compressors,
and turbines
 Vessel steam jackets
 Where PHA indicates the need

LOCATE
11/51
RELIEFS
Choosing Relief Types
 Spring-Operated Valves

 Rupture Devices

CHOOSE
12/51
TYPE
Spring-Operated Valves
 Conventional Type

CHOOSE
13/51
TYPE
Picture: Conventional Relief
Valve
Conventional
Relief Valve

CHOOSE
14/51
TYPE
Superimposed Back
Pressure
 Pressure in
discharge header
before valve opens
 Can be constant or
variable

CHOOSE
15/51
TYPE
Built-up Back Pressure

 Pressure in discharge
header due to
frictional losses after
valve opens
 Total = Superimposed
+ Built-up

CHOOSE
16/51
TYPE
Spring-Operated Valves
 Balanced Bellows Type

CHOOSE
17/51
TYPE
Picture: Bellows Relief
Valve
Bellows
Relief Valve

CHOOSE
18/51
TYPE
Pros & Cons:
Conventional Valve
 Advantages
+ Most reliable type if properly sized and operated
+ Versatile -- can be used in many services

 Disadvantages
– Relieving pressure affected by back pressure
– Susceptible to chatter if built-up back pressure is
too high

CHOOSE
19/51
TYPE
Pros & Cons:
Balanced Bellows Valve
 Advantages
+ Relieving pressure not affected by back pressure
+ Can handle higher built-up back pressure
+ Protects spring from corrosion

 Disadvantages
– Bellows susceptible to fatigue/rupture
– May release flammables/toxics to atmosphere
– Requires separate venting system
CHOOSE
20/51
TYPE
Rupture Devices
 Rupture Disc

 Rupture Pin

CHOOSE
21/51
TYPE
Conventional
Metal Rupture Disc

CHOOSE
22/51
TYPE
Conventional
Rupture Pin Device

CHOOSE
23/51
TYPE
When to Use a Spring-
Operated Valve
 Losing entire contents is unacceptable
– Fluids above normal boiling point
– Toxic fluids
 Need to avoid failing low
 Return to normal operations quickly
 Withstand process pressure changes,
including vacuum
CHOOSE
24/51
TYPE
When to Use a Rupture
Disc/Pin
 Capital and maintenance savings
 Losing the contents is not an issue
 Benign service (nontoxic, non-
hazardous)
 Need for fast-acting device
 Potential for relief valve plugging
 High viscosity liquids
CHOOSE
25/51
TYPE
When to Use Both Types
 Need a positive seal (toxic material,
material balance requirements)

 Protect safety valve from corrosion

 System contains solids

CHOOSE
26/51
TYPE
Relief Event Scenarios
 A description of one specific relief event
 Usually each relief has more than one relief
event, more than one scenario
 Examples include:
– Overfilling/overpressuring
– Fire
– Runaway reaction
– Blocked lines with subsequent expansion
 Developed through Process Hazard Analysis
(PHA)
DEVELOP
27/51
SCENARIOS
An Example: Batch Reactor
 Control valve on
nitric acid feed line
stuck open, vessel Raw
Material
overfills Feeds
 Steam regulator to Organic substrate
Catalyst
jacket fails, vessel Nitric Acid

overpressures
 Coolant system Reactor ~ 100 gallons
fails, runaway Product
reaction
DEVELOP
28/51
SCENARIOS
Sizing Reliefs
 Determining relief rates

 Determine relief vent area

SIZE RELIEFS
29/51
(Single Phase)
Scenarios Drive Relief Rates
 Overfill (e.g., control valve failure)
– Maximum flow rate thru valve into vessel

 Fire
– Vaporization rate due to heat-up

 Blocked discharge
– Design pump flow rate

SIZE RELIEFS
30/51
(Single Phase)
Overfill Scenario Calcs
 Determined maximum flow thru valve
(i.e., blowthrough)
 Liquids: Qm  C v A 2 g c P

g M  
( 1)/( 1)
 Gases: Qm   Cv APo c  2 
 

 choked RgTo  1

SIZE RELIEFS
31/51
(Single Phase)
Fire Scenario Calcs
 API 520 gives all equations for
calculating fire relief rate, step-by-step
1. Determine the total wetted surface area
2. Determine the total heat absorption
3. Determine the rate of vapor or gas
vaporized from the liquid

SIZE RELIEFS
32/51
(Single Phase)
Determine Wetted Area

B  cos11 2 E D 


 

A   D E   L  D  B  /180


wet    

SIZE RELIEFS
33/51
(Single Phase)
Determine Heat Absorption
 Prompt fire-fighting & adequate
drainage: 0.82
Q  21,000 F  A 



Btu/hr wet



 Otherwise: 0.82
Q  34,500 F  A 



Btu/hr wet



where Q is the heat absorption (Btu/hr)


F is the environmental factor
– 1.0 for a bare vessel
– Smaller values for insulated vessels
Awet is the wetted surface area (ft2)
SIZE RELIEFS
34/51
(Single Phase)
Determine Vaporization
Rate
where

W = Mass flow, lbs/hr


W Q /H vap
Q = Total heat absorption to
the wetted surface, Btu/hr

Hvap = Latent heat of


vaporization, Btu/lb
SIZE RELIEFS
35/51
(Single Phase)
Determine Relief Vent Area
 Liquid in 2(psi)1/2

Qv  (  )
A



 ref
Service 38.0 gpm CoKvKpK



 1.25Ps  P
 
b b
 A is the computed relief area (in2)
where  Qv is the volumetric flow thru the relief (gpm)
 Co is the discharge coefficient
 Kv is the viscosity correction
 Kp is the overpressure correction
 Kb is the backpressure correction
 (/ref) is the specific gravity of liquid
 Ps is the gauge set pressure (lbf/in2)
 Pb is the gauge backpressure (lbf/in2)
SIZE RELIEFS
36/51
(Single Phase)
Determine Relief Vent Area
 Gas Qm Tz
A
Service CoK P M
b
P  P max  14. 7
 A is the computed relief area (in )2

Q is 
where Pmax m 1.discharge
the 1Ps for unfired pressure
flow thru the vessels
relief (lb /hr)
m

P
 max
1.2Ps for vessels exposed to fire
 C is the discharge coefficient
o

K is the backpressure correction


b

max 1absolute
P T is the .33Ps for pipingof the discharge (°R)
temperature
 z is the compressibility factor
P is the set pressure for the relief valve
 sM is average molecular weight of gas (lb /lb-mol)
m
 P is maximum absolute discharge pressure (lbf/in2)
  is an isentropic expansion function
SIZE RELIEFS
37/51
(Single Phase)
Determine Relief Vent Area
 Gas  
( 1)/( 1)
  519. 5 

 2 

Service 
 1





where   is an isentropic expansion


function
  is heat capacity ratio for the gas
 Units are as described in previous
slide

SIZE RELIEFS
38/51
(Single Phase)
A Special Issue: Chatter
 Spring relief devices require 25-30%
of maximum flow capacity to maintain
the valve seat in the open position
 Lower flows result in chattering,
caused by rapid opening and closing
of the valve disc
 This can lead to destruction of the
device and a dangerous situation
SIZE RELIEFS
39/51
(Single Phase)
Chatter - Principal Causes
 Valve Issues
– Oversized valve
– Valve handling widely differing rates

 Relief System Issues


– Excessive inlet pressure drop
– Excessive built-up back pressure

SIZE RELIEFS
40/51
(Single Phase)
Worst Case Event Scenario
 Worst case for each relief is the event
requiring the largest relief vent area
 Worst cases are a subset of the overall
set of scenarios for each relief
 The identification of the worst-case
scenario frequently affects relief size
more than the accuracy of sizing calcs
CHOOSE
WORST CASE 41/51
Design Relief System
 Relief System is more than a safety
relief valve or rupture disc, it includes:
– Backup relief device(s)
– Line leading to relief device(s)
– Environmental conditioning of relief device
– Discharge piping/headers
– Blowdown drum
– Condenser, flare stack, or scrubber

DESIGN RELIEF
42/51
SYSTEM
Installation, Inspection, and
Maintenance
 To undermine all the good efforts of a
design crew, simply …
1. Improperly install relief devices
2. Fail to regularly inspect relief devices,
or
3. Fail to perform needed/required
maintenance on relief devices

43/51
?? Reduced Inlet Piping
Reduced
Inlet Piping

Anything wrong
here?

44/51
?? Plugged Bellows, Signs Failed
of
Anything wrong
Inspection,
here? Maintenance
Maintenance
Issues

Bellows plugged
in spite of sign

Failed
Inspection
Program
45/51
?? Discharges Pointing
Down
Anything wrong
here?
Anything
Discharges
Pointing
wrong
here?Down

46/51
?? Long MomentLongArm
Moment Arm

Anything wrong
here?

47/51
?? Will these bolts hold in a
relief event
Will these
bolts hold
in a
relief event?

Anything wrong
here?

48/51
Mexico City Disaster
Major Contributing Cause:
Missing Safety Valve

49/51
Summary
 Pressure Relief
– Very Important ACTIVE safety element
– Connected intimately with Process Hazard
Analysis
– Requires diligence in design, equipment
selection, installation, inspection and
maintenance
 Look forward to …
– Two-phase flow methodology/exercise
50/51
References
 Crowl and Louvar – Chemical Process
Safety, Chapters 8 and 9
 Ostrowski – Fundamentals of Pressure
Relief Devices
 Sterling – Safety Valves: Practical
Design, Practices for Relief, and Valve
Sizing

51/51
END OF
PRESENTATION

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy