Oblicon Report
Oblicon Report
AND
CONTRACTS
CONT.
ANGULO MORELOS
DESPABILADERAS RAPISURA
DURAN YANG
FULFILLMENT OF OBLIGATION
• Payment
PRESUMPTIONS IN PAYMENT OF INTERESTS AND
INSTALLMENTS
• B owes C the amount of P10,000.00 with interest at 14% a year. C issued a receipt for
the principal. The interest was not referred to in the payment whether or not it has been
paid.
• It is presumed that the interest has been previously paid by B because normally the
payment of interest precedes that of the principal.This, however, is only a disputable
presumption and may be overcome by sufficient evidence that such interest had not
really been paid.
TWO KINDS OF PRESUMPTION.
• E is a lessee in the apartment of R, paying P5,000.00 rental a month, E failed to pay the
rent for the months of February and March. In April, E paid P5,000.00 and R issued a
receipt that the payment is for the month of April.
• The presumption is that the rents for the months of February and March had already
been paid. This is also in accordance with the usual business practice whereby prior
installments are first liquidated before payments are applied to the later installments.
Again, this presumption is merely disputable.
WHEN PRESUMPTIONS IN ARTICLE 1176 DO NOT
APPLY
1. With reservation as to interest - The presumptions established in Article 1176 do not
arise where there is a reservation as to interest or prior installments, as the case may
be. The reservation may be made in writing or verbally.
2. Receipt for a part of principal - The first paragraph of Article 1176 only applies to the
receipt of the last installment of the entire capital, not to a mere fraction thereof. This
is logical. A receipt for a part of the principal, without mentioning the interest, merely
implies that the creditor waives his right to apply the payment first to the interest and
then to the principal, as permitted by Article 1253. Only when the principal is fully
receipted for, may failure to reserve the claim for interest give rise to the presumption
that said interest has been paid.
WHEN PRESUMPTIONS IN ARTICLE 1176 DO NOT
APPLY
3. Receipt without indication of particular installment paid - It has been held that the
presumption in paragraph 2, Article 1176 is not applicable if the receipt does not recite
that it was issued for a particular installment due as when the receipt is only dated.
Thus, in the preceding example, the fact alone that the receipt issued by R is dated
April 5, does not justify the inference that the rents for February and March had been
paid.
4. Payment of taxes - Article 1176 does not apply to the payment of taxes. Taxes payable by
the year are not installments of the same obligation.
5. Non-payment proven - Of course, Article 1176 is not applicable where the non-payment
of the prior obligations has been proven. Between a proven fact and a presumption pro
tanto, the former stands, and the latter falls.
TRANSMISSIBILITY OF RIGHTS
• ART. 1206. When only one prestation has been agreed upon, but the
obligor may render another in substitution, the obligation is called
facultative.
• The loss or deterioration of the thing intended as a substitute,
through the negligence of the obligor, does not render him liable.
But once the substitution has been made, the obligor is liable for the
loss of the substitute on account of his delay, negligence or fraud.
MEANING OF FACULTATIVE OBLIGATION