Channel Conflict: Samsung Case Study
Channel Conflict: Samsung Case Study
PRESENTED BY:
BHUDEB ACHARJEE, 13
BIPLAB NATH, 15
MAGHONATH PURKAYASTHA, 31
POONAM DAS, 39
Contents:
Ambiguous
Roles
Intermediaries
Dependence on Different
Manufacturer Perception
Goal Communication
Incompatibility Barrier
Managing the Channel Conflict
Exchange
Subordinate of
Goals Employe-
es
Trade Co-
Associati- operation
ons
Diplomacy,
Mediation, Legal
Resource
Arbitration
Case: Samsung India
Samsung Electronics, one of the leading players in mobile sales in India,
was faced with a boycott threat from its distributors in India in 2014. The
dealers raised their voice against the price discrimination followed by
Samsung in online sales where the mobile sets were offered at a discounted
price when compared to offline prices. They felt that this had led to a fall
in the sales of the models offline, and they were incurring losses due to this
price discrimination by Samsung. While the growth in the number of
online shoppers in India was increasing, the dealers of Samsung sent an
ultimatum to Samsung that unless it took action to safeguard their
interests, they would boycott its products. In response, Samsung
announced that it had decided to extend exclusivity of selling rights of 48
models, including its much-awaited Galaxy Alpha and Note 4, to offline
retailers. While the dealers welcomed this decision, industry observers felt
that the decision was regressive and might hamper the sales of Samsung in
future given the rise in the trend of online shopping. Some of its rivals had
already tasted success by opting for an online-only distribution model.