0% found this document useful (0 votes)
169 views9 pages

What Is Ases 2.0

This document provides an overview of the Alliance Supplier Evaluation Standard (ASES). ASES consists of process and result indicators to evaluate a supplier's quality management system and actual performance. It is used to evaluate new and current suppliers within the Renault Nissan Mitsubishi Alliance. Suppliers receive an A, B, C, or D rank based on their total score from the evaluation. The evaluation consists of an in-room review of documents and an on-site shop floor review across nine chapters relating to quality management.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
169 views9 pages

What Is Ases 2.0

This document provides an overview of the Alliance Supplier Evaluation Standard (ASES). ASES consists of process and result indicators to evaluate a supplier's quality management system and actual performance. It is used to evaluate new and current suppliers within the Renault Nissan Mitsubishi Alliance. Suppliers receive an A, B, C, or D rank based on their total score from the evaluation. The evaluation consists of an in-room review of documents and an on-site shop floor review across nine chapters relating to quality management.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

1

W H AT I S A S E S ?

SEPT EMBER 2017


2

W H AT I S A S E S ?

_ ASES : Alliance Supplier Evaluation Standard


_ ASES evaluation consists of:
Process indicator = evaluation of the supplier Quality Management System and shop floor
Result indicator = evaluation of actual performance ( for example – number of customer complaints)
Overall Rank = combination of Process and Result

_ ASES is used for following purposes:


New supplier evaluation for sourcing
Current supplier evaluation for improvement
_ Common to Renault Nissan Mitsubishi Alliance
_ ASES result is shared inside the Renault Nissan Mitsubishi Alliance
3

ASES RANK

100
A

4
better
Excellent (80 ~ 100)

80
Result indicator OK for nomination
(optional)

3
B Satisfactory (60 ~ 79)

60
TOTAL : 100 points

2
OK ,but need improvement
C Marginal (40 ~ 59)

40
-Warranty 50 points
-PPM 50 points
-Recall camp. - 20 points D NOK for nomination

1
20
20 40 60 80 100

d c b a
better
Process Indicator
Evaluation :
TOTAL :
8 subjects in meeting room (65 points)
1 subject in shop floor (35 points) 100 points

ASES result rank is provided as A, B, C or D rank.


4

SCORE ASSESMENT

EACH QUESTION

-> scores 0 to 5

5 : Best practice
4 : Renault/Nissan/Mitsubishi expectation
3 : Average DEMERIT SCORE
2 : Insufficient If critical item score is 2 : - 5 on final score
0 : Not existing/No evidence If critical item score is 0 : -10 on final score

FINAL SCORE = SUM (each question score X weight) - DEMERITS


W H AT I S E VA L U AT E D ?

ASES is structured in 9 chapters In-room evaluation

1. Quality policy and quality assurance system


Renault / NISSAN
2. Analysis of the quality concerns for current products
Cause analysis of non-conforming parts / Prevention of recurrence
3. Project management
explanation
Supplier Master Schedule and progress meetings
Phase reviews and Design reviews Supplier
4. Process design and Pre-production OHP

FMEA / Control plan


5. Ramp-up activity
6. Operator training Supplier
Operator skill evaluation Documents (Standards, Procedures , Files etc.)
8. Change Management
Process / Product / Design change management
9. Sub-suppliers management
Sub-supplier 8D management
Shop floor evaluation

7. Shop floor
Check at line start-up & Control of the equipment conditions.
Inspection of work in process/finished parts
Special characteristics
Management of non-conforming parts & Treatment of non-conforming
parts
"Unusual" product and equipment situations.
Maintenance of equipment
* critical item with demerit
R U L E S F O R G O O D E VA L U AT I O N & T I M E K E E P I N G

_ Prepare all documents in meeting room


_ Switch off your mobile phone / no side conversation
_ Show evidence first, then explain
_ Don’t be offended by our interruptions
_ Only relevant person speaks
_ Allow us to talk to workers after authorization
_ You may take pictures during shopfloor tour

FOR INFORMATION :
_ Wrap-up at the end of 2nd day: OK / NOK points, No score, No rank
W H AT W E WA N T T O K N O W & T H E A N S W E R W E E X P E C T

CHECK ITEM EVIDENCE

EXPLAIN the activity and ENSURE STABILITY over time STANDARD, PROCEDURE, RULE, INSTRUCTION
FOR EACH
QUESTION How is it ACTUALLY CONDUCTED ? INSTRUCTIONS, RECORDS, FACTS
AND
ACTIVITY Is it EFFECTIVE ? RESULTS, ANALYSIS, ACTION PLANS
Does it achieve RESULTS / OBJECTIVES ?

Scoring method Criteria

Compare with BEST PRACTICE / Alliance EXPECTATIONS R-N-M Check Sheet

 WORDS WITHOUT EVIDENCE CANNOT BE ACCEPTED


8
9

THANK YOU

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy