Chapter 1 Auditing and Internal Control
Chapter 1 Auditing and Internal Control
Control
Information Technology Auditing and Assurance
Overview of Auditing
External (Financial) Audits
It is an independent attestation performed by the auditor –
who expresses an opinion regarding the presentation of
financial statements.
Attest service a task which performed by CPAs who work
for public accounting firms that are independent of the
client organization being audited. The audit objective is
always associated with assuring the fair presentation of FS.
A key concept in this process is independence. Public
confidence in the reliability of the company’s internally
produced FS rests directly on an evaluation of them by an
independent auditor.
Attest Service versus Advisory
Services
Attest Service is an engagement in which a practitioner is
engaged to issue, or does issue, a written communication
that expresses a conclusion about the reliability of a written
assertion that is the responsibility of another party.
Advisory services are professional services offered by
public accounting firms to improve their client
organizations’ operational efficiency and effectiveness.
Internal Audits
It is an independent appraisal function established within an
organization to examine and evaluate its activities as a
service to the organization. Internal auditors perform a wide
range of activities such as conducting financial audits,
examining an operation’s compliance with org policies,
reviewing the org’s compliance with legal obligations,
evaluating operational efficiency, and detecting and
pursuing fraud within the firm.
Fraud audits have increased in popularity as a corporate
governance tool. Its objective is to investigate anomalies
and gather evidence of fraud that may lead to criminal
conviction.
External versus Internal Auditors
External auditors represent outsiders while internal auditors
represent the interests of the organization. Internal auditors
often cooperate with and assist external auditors in
performing aspects of financial audits to achieve audit
efficiency and reduce audit fees.
The internal auditor’s independence is compromised, and
the external auditor is prohibited by professional standards
from relying on evidence provided by the internal auditors.
In contrast, external auditors can rely in part on evidence
gathered by internal audit departments that are
organizationally independent and report to the board of
directors’ audit committee.
The Role of the Audit Committee
Review General
Controls and Evaluate Results
Evaluate Test
Application and Issue
Results
Controls Auditor’s Report
Tests of Controls
The objective of the tests of controls phase is to determine
whether adequate internal controls are in place and
functioning properly. To accomplish this, the auditor
performs various tests of controls. The evidence-gathering
techniques used in this phase may include both manual
techniques and specialized computer audit techniques.
The Structure of an IT Audit
Substantive Testing
This third phase of the audit process focuses on financial
data. This phase involves a detailed investigation of
specific account balances and transactions through what
are called substantive tests.
Some substantive tests are physical, labor-intensive
activities, such as counting cash, counting inventories in
the warehouse, and verifying the existence of stock
certificates in a safe.
The Structure of an IT Audit
Internal Control
Organization management is required by law to establish
and maintain an adequate system of internal control.
Internal Control
Modifying Principles
Inherent in these control objectives are four modifying
principles that guide designers and auditors of internal
control systems.
Management Responsibility
Methods of Data Processing
Limitations
Reasonable Assurance
Internal Control
Modifying Principles
Management Responsibility
This concept holds that the establishment and maintenance
of a system of internal control is a management
responsibility.
Methods of Data Processing
The internal control system should achieve the four broad
objectives regardless of the data processing method used
(whether manual or computer based). However, the specific
techniques used to achieve these objectives will vary with
different types of technology.
Internal Control
Modifying Principles
Limitations
The possibility of error
Circumvention
Management override
Changing conditions
Reasonable Assurance
Provide the four broad objectives of internal control are met.
This reasonableness means that the cost of achieving
improved control should not weigh its benefits.
The PDC Model
Preventive Controls
Prevention is the first line of defense in the control structure.
Preventive controls are passive techniques designed to
reduce the frequency of occurrence of undesirable events.
Preventive controls force compliance with prescribed or
desired actions thus screen out aberrant events.
Detective Controls
Detection of problems is the second line of defense. Detective
controls are devices, techniques, and procedures designed to
identify and expose undesirable events that elude preventive
controls. Detective controls reveal specific types of errors by
comparing actual occurrences to pre-established standards.
The PDC Model
Corrective Controls
Corrective actions must be taken to reverse the effects of
detected errors. There is an important distinction between
detective and corrective controls. Detective controls
identify undesirable events and draw attention to the
problem; corrective controls actually fix the problem.
COSO Internal Control Framework
IT Controls
Information technology drives the financial reporting
processes of modern organizations. Automated systems
initiate, authorize, record, and report the effects of financial
transactions.