Risk Management: Reported By: Darroca, John Rolde Augustine G. Deraper, Rachelle Mae Felismino, Mary R. Patoc, Nino
Risk Management: Reported By: Darroca, John Rolde Augustine G. Deraper, Rachelle Mae Felismino, Mary R. Patoc, Nino
Reported by:
Darroca, John Rolde Augustine G.
Deraper, Rachelle Mae
Felismino, Mary R.
Patoc, NiNo
RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk Management - is the process of
identifying, analyzing and responding to risk
factors throughout the life of a project and in
the best interests of its objectives. Proper
risk management implies control of possible
future events and is proactive rather than
reactive.
Importance of risk management
Projects often get started in the right direction but
then get off track. For example, project managers will
spend time with their teams to develop a clear scope and
detailed plan. Then something happens; something
unexpected—a major disaster strikes. The project
manager and team move quickly into their reactive mode
– they manage this risk based on their experiences and
best judgment but they have no opportunity to test it out
and they hope that it’ll be okay, but they do not know for
sure. This is not risk management – it is management by
crisis. Here are some rules to help you manage project
risk effectively:
II. Managing project risks and opportunities
It is apparent that the traditional project risk management practice can provide a useful
platform for portraying and communicating potential negative events in projects. But at the
same time the project risk management omits largely the positive outcomes, that is
opportunities. The modern business and finance management is suggesting that the linkages
between risks and opportunities need to acknowledged and taken into account in
management practice. This should be taken as a starting point for the development of the
new project risk and opportunity management practice that needs to cover both negative
risks and positive opportunities, their analysis and balancing.
Experienced project managers, directors and company executives are intuitively
balancing project risks and opportunities. In practice this means that when facing unusually
high risks then there need to be clear opportunities for an improved benefits, for example
high project margin. It is considered to be very important that the practical models and
methods for risk management comply with this natural way reasoning and decision-making.
Thus, the management of negative risks and positive opportunities should be integrated and
the models and methods, which are available, need to be according to this principle.
What is needed is an approach, which can integrate smoothly together the management
of project risks and opportunities. Perhaps we need to start to talk about risk and
opportunity management as a general concept that in a natural way can include the views
over negative and positive outcomes without clumsy concepts (“positive risk” or “upside
risk”) or methods partly or completely omitting the assessment of positive opportunities
10 Rules for Managing Project Risks and Opportunities
The Risk Management Process is intended to reduce
management by crisis. While there may always be some things
that will occur that are unanticipated, most of these, through
sound risk management, can be managed, rather than reacted
to. Essentially, the Managing Project Risks is a quality problem-
solving process. Quality and assessment tools are used to
determine and prioritize risks for assessment.
2. Risk identification:
This phase is needed to determine the
risks, which might affect the project and document their
characteristics.
3. Qualitative risk analysis:
risks are prioritized for
subsequent further analysis or action by assessing and
combining their probability of occurrence and impact.
C. Culture
E. Delays
Disputes frequently arise in respect of delays and who should bear the
responsibility for them. Most construction contracts make provision for
extending the time for completion. The sole reason for this is that the
owner can keep alive any rights to delay damages recoverable from the
contractor
F. Design
If the contract inadequately describes which party is to take the risk for
the site conditions, disputes are inevitable when adverse site or
ground conditions impede the progress of work or require more
expensive engineering solutions.
K. Tender
M. Value engineering
This term often lacks definition in construction contracts and can lead
to disputes, particularly where the saving is to be shared between the
contractor and the owner. Savings in respect of the supply and
installation of the material or product in question might be relatively
easy to determine and agree, but these are not the only benchmarks,
and a proper value engineering approach needs to take full account
of the life cycle costs of any proposed change.
Firm insurance
A design professional encounters many
risks that can result in financial losses to
numerous people. Insurance transfers those
risks to an insurance company in return for
a premium payment. There are a number of
important types of architecture firm
insurance that an owner should understand
to determine if coverage is warranted.
• Professional Liability Insurance to defend and pay on behalf of
the architect for claims alleging an error or negligence in the
performance of professional duties; without this coverage,
one puts the firm and its architects in jeopardy. With
professional liability coverage, a firm continues to retain some
risk such as their deductible, costs exceeding policy limits, or
costs for claims that are excluded from the scope of coverage.