Tanishq
Tanishq
OR
GOLD+
GROUP 1
PROTAGONIST
C K Venkatraman Bhaskar Bhat
(Head of Tanishq) (Managing Director, Titan)
OTHER PLAYERS
Manoj Chakravarti, (Titan Govind Raj Mr. L. R. Natarajan
VP) (Tanishq VP) (VP of integrated supply
chain management
for Tanishq)
COMPETITORS
• TITAN WAS INCORPORATED IN 1984 AS A JOINT VENTURE
BETWEEN THE TATA GROUP AND TAMIL NADU INDUSTRIAL
CORPORATION (TIDCO)
• THE INDIAN GOLD JEWELRY MARKET WAS ESTIMATED AT
RS.60,000 CRORES ANNUALLY.
• TANISHQ FACED LOCAL COMPETITORS THAT WERE BIGGER
THAN TANISHQ LOCALLY
FACT • THERE WERE OVER 25,000 FAMILY-OWNED INDEPENDENT
JEWELERS
S • AT THE BACK END OF THE SUPPLY CHAIN WAS A GROUP OF
OVER 3 MILLION CRAFTSMEN OR KARIGARS
• KARIGARS TYPICALLY RECEIVED RS.30 PER GRAM OF GOLD
FOR WORK, WITH THE BEST KARIGARS RECEIVING UP TO
RS.40 PER GRAM.
• TITAN SHIFTED ITS ATTENTION TO THE DOMESTIC JEWELRY
MARKET IN 1995
• IN 1996 TITAN MANAGEMENT DECIDED TO MANUFACTURE
AND MARKET PRECIOUS STUDDED JEWELRY UNDER THE
TANISHQ BRAND
• IN JULY 1996, TANISHQ OPENED ITS FIRST BOUTIQUE
IN CHENNAI.
• UNDER-KARATAGE WAS AN INDUSTRY-WIDE PROBLEM
• OVER 5,000 WOMEN CHECKED THEIR JEWELRY WITH
OVER 60% FINDING THEIR PIECES TO BE UNDER-
KARATAGE
FACTS • BY 2000, TANISHQ HAD FINALLY ESTABLISHED A
BEACHHEAD IN THE 22-KARAT GOLD JEWELRY
• MARKET AND HAD HIT THE RS.100 CRORES MARK AS A
BRAND
• TANISHQ’S MARKUP FOR GOLD WAS 15% TO 25%
• LOCAL JEWELERS’ MARK-UP WAS 5% TO 15%
• FROM 1996-2000, DISPOSABLE INCOME IN INDIA WAS
QUITE LOW, WITH ABOUT 60% GOING TO HOUSEHOLD
EXPENSES AND 30% TO 40% GOING TO SAVINGS
THE GOLD+ PROPOSAL
• Will circumvent Tanish's perception of • Expansion will increase the tax rate from
a brand meant only for the rich 2% to 6%
• Would be focused on just gold, which is • No market study conducted to check if
80% of the jewellery market the model will work for North India
• Design and sell gold jewellery at
competitive pricing SWOT
Opportunities Threats
LAUNCHING
• Will have an opportunity to target semi
urban and rural market of over Rs.
• Stiff competition from local
individual and familiar jewellers
GOLD+
36000 crores • New players may also enter the market
• The success in Erode and Ratlam could • Chance of cannibalizing Tanishq's sales
be replicated in the rest of South India.
Strengths Weakness
• Strong backing from the TATA group • Negative brand perception – The brand
• Innovative and modern award-winning is only for "Rich"
styles • Limited Global presence as compared to
• The advertising strategy to target wider international brands
audience • Tough competition from their
• Caters to all market segments with competitors – Resulting in limited brand
different sub brands growth
• QUALITY COMPROMISE : Gold+, being a low-end brand would stand out contrasted
in terms of quality when compared with the high end Tanishq products
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
GOLD+ & TANISHQ
• LOOK AND AESTHETIC : Gold+ aimed at ethnic design low-cost jewelry while Tanishq
catered to an urban and premium look
• LOCATION : While Tanishq would have to its retail locations across the major
metropolitan areas and its immediate suburbs, Gold+ aimed at setting up its retail chain
across 83 towns, majority of which would be the tier 2 towns
Thank You