The Cellular Concept - Fundamentals
The Cellular Concept - Fundamentals
I. Introduction
Cellular concept
3
Cells labeled with the same letter use the same
group of channels.
Cell Cluster: group of N cells using complete set of
available channels
Many base stations, lower power, and shorter towers
Small coverage areas called “cells”
Each cell allocated a % of the total number of
available channels
Nearby (adjacent) cells assigned different channel
groups
to prevent interference between neighboring base
stations and mobile users
4
Same frequency channels may be reused by cells a
“reasonable” distance away
reused many times as long as interference between
same channel (co-channel) cells is < acceptable level
5
II. Frequency Reuse/Planning
6
Cells
base station antennas designed to cover specific cell
area
hexagonal cell shape assumed for planning
simple model for easy analysis → circles leave gaps
actual cell “footprint” is amorphous (no specific shape)
where Tx successfully serves mobile unit
base station location
cell center → omni-directional antenna (360°
coverage)
not necessarily in the exact center (can be up to R/4
from the ideal location)
7
cell corners → sectored or directional antennas
on 3 corners with 120° coverage.
very commom
Note that what is defined as a “corner” is
somewhat flexible → a sectored antenna covers
120° of a hexagonal cell.
So one can define a cell as having three antennas
in the center or antennas at 3 corners.
8
III. System Capacity
9
M : # of times a cluster is replicated over a
geographic coverage area
System Capacity = Total # Duplex Channels = C
C=MS=MkN
11
12
To find the nearest co-channel neighbors of a particular cell
(1) Move i cells along any chain of hexagons, then (2)
turn 60 degrees and move j cells.
13
14
15
16
IV. Channel Assignment Strategies
Goal is to minimize interference & maximize use of
capacity
Two main strategies: Fixed or Dynamic
Fixed
each cell allocated a pre-determined set of voice channels
calls within cell only served by unused cell channels
all channels used → blocked call → no service
several variations
MSC allows cell to borrow a VC (that is to say, a FVC/RVC
pair) from an adjacent cell
donor cell must have an available VC to give
17
Dynamic
channels NOT allocated permanently
call request → goes to serving base station → goes
to MSC
MSC allocates channel “on the fly”
allocation strategy considers:
likelihood of future call blocking in the cell
reuse distance (interference potential with other cells
that are using the same frequency)
channel frequency
All frequencies in a market are available to be used
18
Advantage: reduces call blocking (that is to say,
it increases the trunking capacity), and
increases voice quality
Disadvantage: increases storage &
computational load @ MSC
requires real-time data from entire network related
to:
channel occupancy
traffic distribution
Radio Signal Strength Indications (RSSI's) from all
channels
19
V. Handoff Strategies
20
Minimum useable signal level
lowest acceptable voice quality
call is dropped if below this level
specified by system designers
typical values → -90 to -100 dBm
21
Quick review: Decibels
Signal-to-noise ratio:
N = Noise power in Watts
S/N = 10 log10(S/N) dB (unitless raio)
22
choose a (handoff threshold) > (minimum
useable signal level)
so there is time to switch channels before level
becomes too low
as mobile moves away from base station and
toward another base station
23
24
Handoff Margin △
△ = Phandoff threshold - Pminimum usable signal dB
carefully selected
△ too large → unnecessary handoff → MSC loaded down
△ too small → not enough time to transfer → call dropped!
A dropped handoff can be caused by two factors
not enough time to perform handoff
delay by MSC in assigning handoff
high traffic conditions and high computational load on MSC
can cause excessive delay by the MSC
no channels available in new cell
25
Handoff Decision
signal level decreases due to
signal fading → don’t handoff
mobile moving away from base station → handoff
must monitor received signal strength over a period
of time → moving average
time allowed to complete handoff depends on
mobile speed
large negative received signal strength (RSS) slope →
high speed → quick handoff
statistics of the fading signal are important to
making appropriate handoff decisions
26
1st Generation Cellular (Analog FM → AMPS)
Received signal strength (RSS) of RVC measured
at base station & monitored by MSC
A spare Rx in base station (locator Rx) monitors
RSS of RVC's in neighboring cells
Tells Mobile Switching Center about these mobiles and
their channels
Locator Rx can see if signal to this base station is
significantly better than to the host base station
MSC monitors RSS from all base stations &
decides on handoff
27
2nd Generation Cellular: (GSM, IS-136)
Mobile Assisted Hand Offs (MAHO)
important advancement
The mobile measures the RSS of the FCC’s from
adjacent base stations & reports back to serving base
station
if Rx power from new base station > Rx power from
serving (current) base station by pre-determined
margin for a long enough time period → handoff
initiated by MSC
28
MSC no longer monitors RSS of all channels
reduces computational load considerably
enables much more rapid and efficient handoffs
imperceptible to user
29
A mobile may move into a different system
controlled by a different MSC
Called an intersystem handoff
What issues would be involved here?
Prioritizing Handoffs
Issue: Perceived Grade of Service (GOS) – service
quality as viewed by users
“quality(not voice quality)” in terms of dropped or
blocked calls (for a new call attempt) assign higher
priority to handoff vs. new call request
a dropped call is more aggravating than an occasional
blocked call
30
Guard Channels
% of total available cell channels exclusively set
aside for handoff requests
makes fewer channels available for new call
requests
a good strategy is dynamic channel allocation (not
fixed)
adjust number of guard channels as needed by demand
so channels are not wasted in cells with low traffic
31
Queuing Handoff Requests
use time delay between handoff threshold and
minimum useable signal level to place a blocked
handoff request in queue
a handoff request can "keep trying" during that time
period, instead of having a single block/no block
decision
prioritize requests (based on mobile speed) and
handoff as needed
calls will still be dropped if time period expires
32
VI. Practical Handoff Considerations
33
Umbrella Cells
use different antenna heights and Tx power levels
to provide large and small cell coverage
multiple antennas & Tx can be co-located at single
location if necessary (saves on obtaining new tower
licenses)
large cell → high speed traffic → fewer handoffs
small cell → low speed traffic
example areas: interstate highway passing thru
urban center, office park, or nearby shopping mall
34
35
Cell Dragging
low speed user with line of sight to base station (very strong
signal)
strong signal changing slowly
user moves into the area of an adjacent cell without handoff
causes interference with adjacent cells and other cells
Remember: handoffs help all users, not just the one which is
handed off.
If this mobile is closer to a reused channel → interference
for the other user using the same frequency
So this mobile needs to hand off anyway, so other users
benefit because that mobile stays far away from them.
36
Typical handoff parameters
Analog cellular (1st generation)
threshold margin △ ≈ 6 to 12 dB
total time to complete handoff ≈ 8 to 10 sec
Digital cellular (2nd generation)
total time to complete handoff ≈ 1 to 2 sec
lower necessary threshold margin △ ≈ 0 to 6 dB
enabled by mobile assisted handoff
37
benefits of small handoff time
greater flexibility in handling high/low speed
users
queuing handoffs & prioritizing
more time to “rescue” calls needing urgent
handoff
fewer dropped calls → GOS increased
can make decisions based on a wide range of metrics
other than signal strength
such as also measure interference levels
can have a multidimensional algorithm for
making decisions
38
Soft vs. Hard Handoffs
Hard handoff: different radio channels assigned
when moving from cell to cell
all analog (AMPS) & digital TDMA systems (IS-136,
GSM, etc.)
Many spread spectrum users share the same
frequency in every cell
CDMA → IS-95
Since a mobile uses the same frequency in every cell, it
can also be assigned the same code for multiple cells
when it is near the boundary of multiple cells.
The MSC simultaneously monitors reverse link signal
at several base stations
39
MSC dynamically decides which signal is best
and then listens to that one
Soft Handoff
passes data from that base station on to the PSTN
This choice of best signal can keep changing.
Mobile user does nothing for handoffs except
just transmit, MSC does all the work
Advantage unique to CDMA systems
As long as there are enough codes available.
40
VII. Co-Channel Interference
41
Frequency Reuse
Many cells in a given coverage area use the same
set of channel frequencies to increase system
capacity (C)
Co-channel cells → cells that share the same set of
frequencies
VC & CC traffic in co-channel cells is an
interfering source to mobiles in Several different
cells
42
Possible Solutions?
1) Increase base station Tx power to improve radio
signal reception? __
this will also increase interference from co-channel
cells by the same amount
no net improvement
2) Separate co-channel cells by some minimum
distance to provide sufficient isolation from
propagation of radio signals?
if all cell sizes, transmit powers, and coverage patterns
≈ same → co-channel interference is independent of Tx
power
43
co-channel interference depends on:
R : cell radius
D : distance to base station of nearest co-channel cell
if D / R ↑ then spatial separation relative to cell
coverage area ↑
improved isolation from co-channel RF energy
Q = D / R : co-channel reuse ratio
hexagonal cells → Q = D/R = 3N
44
45
46
Fundamental tradeoff in cellular system design:
small Q → small cluster size → more frequency
reuse → larger system capacity great
But also: small Q → small cell separation →
increased co-channel interference (CCI) → reduced
voice quality → not so great
Tradeoff: Capacity vs. Voice Quality
47
Signal to Interference ratio → S / I, ____________
48
Approximation with some assumptions
49
Path loss may be Path loss is influenced
due to: by:
Free space loss Terrain contours
Reflection Environment (urban/rural,
Refraction vegetation and foliage)
Aperture- propagation medium
medium ( dry/mist)
coupling loss Distance between
Absorption transmitter and receiver
Height and location of
antenna
50
n : path loss exponent
free space or line of sight (LOS) (no obstruction) →
n=2
urban cellular → n = 2 to 4, signal decays faster
with distance away from the base station
having the same n throughout the coverage area
means radio propagation properties are roughly the
same everywhere
if base stations have equal Tx power and n is the
same throughout coverage area (not always true)
then the above equation (Eq. 3.8) can be used.
51
Now if we consider only the first layer (or tier)
of co-channel cells
assume only these provide significant interference
And assume interfering base stations are
equidistant from the desired base station (all at
distance ≈ D) then
52
What determines acceptable S / I ?
voice quality → subjective testing
AMPS → S / I ≧18 dB (assumes path loss
exponent n = 4)
Solving (3.9) for N
54
S / I is usually the worst case when a mobile is at the
cell edge
low signal power from its own base station & high
interference power from other cells
more accurate approximations are necessary in those cases
S R 4
I 2( D R )4 2( D R )4 2 D 4
55
N =7 and S / I ≈ 17 dB
56
Eq. (3.5), (3.8), and (3.9) are (S / I) for forward link
only, i.e. the cochannel base Tx interfering with
desired base station transmission to mobile unit
so this considers interference @ the mobile unit
What about reverse link co-channel interference?
less important because signals from mobile antennas (near
the ground) don’t propagate as well as those from tall base
station antennas
obstructions near ground level significantly attenuate mobile
energy in direction of base station Rx
also weaker because mobile Tx power is variable → base
stations regulate transmit power of mobiles to be no larger
than necessary
57
Adjacent channel Interference (ACI)
59
Frequency seperation
60
61
Improving Coverage and Capacity in cellular system
Cellular design techniques are needed to
provide more channels per unit coverage area.
Techniques used in general to increase
capacity are
Cell Splitting
Sectoring
Coverage zone approaches
62
Cell Splitting
63
New cells are defined which have a smaller radius than the original
cells and these smaller cells (microcells) are installed between the
existing cells
Capacity increases due to additional number of channels per unit
area
64
Imagine if every cell in above fig. is reduced such that the
radius of every cell was cut into half
In order to cover the entire service area with smaller cells,
approx. four times as many cells would be required.
number of cells number of clusters over coverage
area number of channels capacity
Cell splitting allows a system to grow by replacing large
cells with smaller cells, while not upsetting the channel
allocation scheme required to maintain the minimum co-
channel reuse ratio Q between co-channel cells
65
In fig. shown BSs are placed at corners of the
cells and area covered by BS A is assumed to
be saturated in traffic.
(i.e. Blocking of BS A exceeds acceptable
rates)
New BSs are needed in the region to increase
the number of channels in the area.
In Fig. original BS A is surrounded by six new
microcells
66
The transmit power of the new cells is to be reduced
Transmit power of new cells with radius half that of the
original cells is found by examining the received power Pr
new and old cell boundaries and setting them equal to each
other
67
Cell Sectoring
68
In sectoring SIR is improved by using directional antennas,
then capacity improvement is achieved by reducing the number
of cells in a cluster
70
71
Assuming seven-cell reuse for the case of 120̊
sectors, no. of interferers is reduced from six to
two
two of the six co-channel cells receive interference
with a particular sectored channel group
if omnidirectional antennas were used at each BS,
all six co-channel cells would interfere with the
center cell
In fig. consider the interference experienced by a
mobile located in the rightmost sector in the center
cell labelled ‘5’
72