Capital Structure: Theory and Policy
Capital Structure: Theory and Policy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
2
RELEVANCE OF CAPITAL
STRUCTURE:
MM HYPOTHESIS UNDER
CORPORATE TAXES
11
Suppose two firms L and U are identical in all respects except that firm L
is levered and firm U is unlevered. Firm U is an all-equity financed firm
while firm L employs equity and Rs 5,000 debt at 10 per cent rate of
interest. Both firms have an expected earning before interest and taxes (or
net operating income) of Rs 2,500, pay corporate tax at 50 per cent and
distribute 100 per cent earnings as dividends to shareholders.
13
You may notice that the total income after corporate tax is Rs 1,250 for the
unlevered firm U and Rs 1,500 for the levered firm L. Thus, the levered
firm L’s investors are ahead of the unlevered firm U’s investors by Rs 250.
You may also note that the tax liability of the levered firm L is Rs 250 less
than the tax liability of the unlevered firm U. For firm L the tax savings
has occurred on account of payment of interest to debt holders. Hence, this
amount is the interest tax shield or tax advantage of debt of firm L: 0.5 ×
(0.10 × 5,000) = 0.5 × 500 = Rs 250. Thus,
Value of Interest Tax Shield
14
The attractiveness of borrowing depends on corporate tax rate, personal tax rate
on interest income and personal tax rate on equity income.
The advantage of borrowing reduces when corporate tax rate decreases, or when
the personal tax rate on interest income increases, or when the personal tax rate
on equity income decreases.
Shareholders–Managers conflict
1. Capital mix
2. Maturity and priority
3. Terms and conditions
4. Currency
5. Financial innovations
6. Financial market segments
Framework for Capital
Structure:
29
The FRICT Analysis
Flexibility
Risk
Income
Control
Timing
APPROACHES TO ESTABLISH
TARGET CAPITAL STRUCTURE
30