This document discusses the relationship between the self, society, and culture. It argues that the self is not a static, isolated entity, but is constantly shaped by social interactions and contexts. Language acquisition and interaction with others, particularly as a child, helps shape one's sense of self through assuming social roles. The family is also hugely influential in developing a person's self-identity through both conscious and unconscious socialization. Gender is another key aspect of the self that is influenced by societal expectations, though one should have freedom to discover and assert their own identity.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
113 views24 pages
Lesson2: The Self, Society and Culture
This document discusses the relationship between the self, society, and culture. It argues that the self is not a static, isolated entity, but is constantly shaped by social interactions and contexts. Language acquisition and interaction with others, particularly as a child, helps shape one's sense of self through assuming social roles. The family is also hugely influential in developing a person's self-identity through both conscious and unconscious socialization. Gender is another key aspect of the self that is influenced by societal expectations, though one should have freedom to discover and assert their own identity.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24
LESSON2: THE SELF,
SOCIETY AND CULTURE
Lesson Objectives At the end of this lesson, you should be able to: 1. Explain the relationship between and among the self,society, and culture; 2. Describe and discuss the different ways by which society and cultures hape the self; 3. Compare and contrast how the self can be influenced by the different institutions in the society;and 4. Examine one’s self against the different views of self that were discussed in the class. Introduction • Across time and history, the self has been debated,discussed and fruit fully or otherwise conceptualized by different thinkers in philosophy. Eventually, with the advent of social sciences, it became possible for new was and paradigms to reexamine the true nature of the self. • People put a halt on speculative debates on the relationship between the body and soul,eventually renamed body and the mind. • The debate shifted into another locus of discussion.One of the loci,if not the most important axis of the analysis is the relationship between the self and the external world. What is the relationship between external reality and the self?
Human persons will not develop as human persons without intervention
• Ourselves are not special because of the soul infused into us • Ourselves are truly products of our interaction with external reality. What is the Self? • “separate, self-contained, independent, consistent, unitary and private” (Stevens1996). • The last characteristics of the self being private suggests that the self is isolated from the external world. • It lives within its own world. However,we also see that this potential clash between the self and the • external reality is the reason for the self to have a clear understanding of what it might be, what it can be, and what it will be. • The concern of this lesson is inunderstanding the vibrant relationship between the self and external reality. • This perspective is known as the Social Constructionist Perspective. • "Social Constructionist argue for a merged view of the 'person' and their 'social context' where the boundaries of the other” (Stevens1996) • Social Constructivists argue that the self should not be seen as astatic entity that stays constant through and through. • The self has to be seen as something that is in unceasing flux. • The Self is always in participation with social life and it's identity subjected to influences here and there. • The Self is truly multi faceted • We ourselves play different roles,act indifferent ways depending on our circumstances. • The Self is capable of morphing and fitting itself in THE SELF AND CULTURE Remaining the same person and turning the chameleon by adapting to one’s context is paradoxical. This phenomenon was explained by Marcel Mauss, a French Anthropologist. According to Mauss, every self has two faces:
PERSONNE and MOI.
• MOI - refers to a person’s who he is, his body, and his basic identity, his giveness. It means the true identity of oneself. In our own dialect. • PERSONNE – is composed of the social concepts of what it means to be who he is. It has to do with what it means to live in a particular institution, a particular family, a particular religion, a particular nationality, and how to behave given expectations and influences from others. Language is another interesting aspect of social constructivism. THE SELF AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SOCIAL WORLD • One is believed to be in active participation in the shaping of the self. • A human persons are just passive actors in the whole process of the shaping of the selves. • The man aren’t woman are born with particularities that may no longer change. • Men and women, their growth and development engage actively in the shaping of the self. • The unending terrain of metamorphosis of the self is midiated by language • Schwartz, White and Lutz 1993, “language publicly shared on privately utilized symbol system is the site where the individual and the social make and remake each other.”
• According to Mead and Vygotsky, the way
that human persons develop is with the used of language acquisitionand interaction with others • Both Mead and Vygotsky, treat the human mind as something that is made constituted through language as experienced in the external world and as encountered in dialogues with others. • For Mead perspective; these takes place as a child assumes the ‘other' through language and roleplay child conceptualiazed his notion of ‘self’ through this. It is through this that the ‘Ithe’ shall delineates the ‘I’ from the rest.
• For Vygotsky, a child internalizes real-life dialogues that he
has with others with his family, his primary caregiver or his playmates. They applies this to their mental and practical problems along with the social and cultural infusions brought about by the said dialogues. SELF IN THE FAMILIES • Every child is born with certain givenness, disposition coming from his parent's genes in and general condition of life, the impact of one's family is still deemed as a given in the understanding the self.
• Human beings are born virtually helpless and
dependency period of a human baby to its parents for nurturing relatively longer than most other animals. • Behavior may either be unconscious or conscious.
• Some behaviors and attitudes, on the other
hand , may be and indirectly thought taught rewards and punishment. • Without a family biologically and sociologically, a person may not even survive or become a human person. GENDER AND THE SELF • Gender is the self that is subject to alteration change in development.
• It is one of the most important aspect of self
shaping .
• Gender fluidity is how we identify and
behave yourself that was influenced by the society. • The sense of the self that is being taught to makes sure that an individual fits in a particular environment. • Gender has to be personally discovered and asserted • not dedicated by culture and society. • It's something we choose to. It is important to give one leeway to express and live his identity.