ASSET

INTEGRITY
MANAGEMENT
BVF2143

AZIZUL HELMI B SOFIAN

FACULTY OF CHEMICAL &

PROCESS ENGINEERING
TECHNOLOGY (FTKKP), UMP
COURSE OUTLINE

This course enables technologists to learn the

fundamental of asset integrity management in oil
and gas industries. Technologist will be exposed to
understand the material integrity as a key part in
optimizing engineering design and crucial to the long-
term performance of equipment and facilities. Also
selection of metals and non-metallic materials;
corrosion mitigation and management of corrosion
risks; and metallurgy.
COURSE OUTCOMES
At the end of this course, students will be able to:

 Able to explain the important of asset integrity

management

 Able to differenciate corrosion control and

protection in oil & gas industries

 Able to propose inspection, test and maintenance

plan in general
COURSE CONTENTS
Overall contents for this course:

 Overview in Asset Integrity Management Chapter 1

 Asset Management (systematic and
synchronized activities)

 Degradation and failure modes Chapter 2

 Risk Based Inspection (RBI) Chapter 3
 Non Invasive Inspection (NVI) Chapter 4
 Inspection and monitoring
 NDT Techniques Overview Chapter 5
 Life extensionof Aging Assets Chapter 6
 Asset Management Triangle Chapter 7
 Lecturing Plan
Week Date Title
1 (19-23 Oct) Class Briefing
Chapter 1
2 (26-20 Oct) Chapter 2 - Quiz
3
4 (9 – 13 Nov) Chapter 3 - Quiz
5 (16- 20 Nov)
6 (23- 27 Nov ) (TEST 1 – 26 Nov 2020 – 8:30 pm – 10:00 pm)
WEEK 7 (MID SEM BREAK) (28 Nov – 6 Dec)
8 (7- 11 Dec) Chapter 4 - Report
9 (14 – 18 Dec) Chapter 5 - Report
Chapter 6 - Quiz
10 (21- 25 Dec) Chapter 7 - Quiz
11 (28 Dec – 1 Jan)
12 (10 -15 Jan) Mini Project Presentation
13 (18-22 Jan)
WEEK 13 STUDY WEEK
FINAL EXAM
COURSE ASSESMENTS & GRADING

Assessment Expected week Marks (%)

Quizzes (Take Home Every week 15
Quizzes / Application
Quizzes) - 10 sets
(individual/pair)
Test (individual) – Chapter Week 5/6 30
1,2,3
Assignments 1, 2 Week 5 20
(individual/ pair)
Report (Lab) Week 6- Week 13 15
Mini Project Presentation Week 15 20 (5% peer review,
(Group of 4 or 5 persons) 15 % instructor)
TOTAL = 100%
INTRODUCTION
Offshore & Subsea Oil and Gas Fasilities

Typical floating structures used in oil & gas industry

https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5134/5/1/8
MALAYSIA OIL & GAS - PENINSULAR

https://2b1stconsulting.com/murphy-oil-and-petronas-to-speed-up-kenarong-and-pertang-development-offshore-
malaysia/
MALAYSIA OIL & GAS – SABAH &
SARAWAK

Map courtesy of Maps & Globe Specialist Distributor Sdn. Bhd

(www.mapsglobe.com)
Peninsular Malaysia Gas Pipeline
Infrastructures

https://www.st.gov.my/ms/contents/presentations/tariff/2_Petronas_Cabaran%20pembekalan%20bahan%20api%20gas,
%20LNG%20dan%20arang%20batu%20kepada%20sektor%20penjanaan.pdf
Integrated Oil & Gas Industries

https://www.st.gov.my/ms/contents/presentations/tariff/2_Petronas_Cabaran%20pembekalan%20bahan%20api%20gas,
%20LNG%20dan%20arang%20batu%20kepada%20sektor%20penjanaan.pdf
Standardize approach to Integrity Management across assets is not easy

Facilities Equipment

Exploration and Pipelines

Production Structures
Pressure Vessels
Refining
Static Equipment
Rotating Equipment
Processing
Instrumentation

Distribution Offshore
Onshore
What is Asset
Integrity
Management?
What happens when proper Asset Integrity Management
Systems are not in place or when those that are failed
Definition
Based on UK Health and Safety Executive

“Asset Integrity can can be defined as the

ability of an asset to perform its requires
function effectively and efficiently while
protecting health, safety and environment.

Asset Integrity Management is the means of

ensuring that people, systems, processes and
resources that deliver integrity are in place, in
use and will perform when required over the
whole lifecycle of the asset”
Definition cont’d

• Asset Integrity can further describes as –

continuous assesment process applied
throughout the design, construction, installation
and operations.
• The integrity management process – prevent,
detect, control or mitigate against major accident
hazard
Objectives
• Compliance with company standrds, regulatory and
legislative requirements
• Assurance of technical integrity by the application of
risk based or risk informed engineering principleas
and techniques
• Delivery the required safety, environmental and
operational performance
• Retention of the license to operate
• Optimization of theactivities and the resources
required to operate the facilities while maintaining
system integrity
• Assurance of the facilities’ fitness for purpose
Contributors to Asset Integrity
Processes and activities

• Design and construction process

• Planned maintenance process
• Fluids and chemical monitoring process
• Topsides integrity management process
• Subsea integrity management process
• Verification process
• Class/flag surveys for non-fixed offshores assets
(FPSO, Jackup, Semi Subs etc)
Inputs to Overall Asset Integrity Management
Legal Framework
One of the main drivers for the integrity management activities is the
requirement for compliance with the relevant national legislation. In the
UK, for example, the offshore legislation includes

• The Safety Case Regulations

•  Pipeline Safety Regulations
• Offshore Installations and Wells (Design & Construction, etc.)
Regulations
• Prevention of Fire and Explosion and Emergency Response
Regulations
Malaysia Oil & Gas Landscape
Legal Framework
 Petroleum Regulations, 1974

• Atomic Energy Licensing Act, 1984;

• Communications and Multimedia Act, 1998;
• Continental Shelf Act, 1966;
• Customs Act, 1967;
• Environmental Quality Act, 1974;
• Excise Act, 1976;
• Exclusive Economic Zone Act 1984;
• Factories and Machinery Act, 1967;
• Gas Supply Act, 1993;
• Merchant Shipping Ordinance, 1952;
• Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1994;
• Petroleum (Income Tax) Act, 1967;
• Petroleum (Safety Measures) Act, 1984.
Legal Framework
This legislation requires that a policy be in place for the prevention of major
accidents. In addition there is a further requirement to comply with the
Operator’s HSE Policy which will include such criteria as:

• Leadership and Accountability

• Risk Assessment and Management
• People, Training and Behaviors
• Working with Contractors and Others
• Facilities Design and Construction
• Operations and Maintenance
• Management of Change
• Information and Documentation
• Customers and Products
• Community and Stakeholder Awareness
• Crisis and Emergency Management
• Incidents Analysis and Prevention
• Assessment, Assurance and Improvement
The Safety Case Regulations require the operator to identify the safety
critical elements (SCE) on the facility and draw up a verification
scheme for these safety critical elements. Safety critical elements
means such parts of an installation and such parts of its plant

• the failure of which could cause or contribute substantially to a

major accident
• a purpose of which is to prevent, or limit the effect of, a major
accident

In addition to compliance with legislative and company requirements,

there is also a significant business benefit from ensuring the integrity
of the assets / facilities. Minimizing production losses, prevention of
unplanned shutdowns and rationalization of the purchase and storage
of spare parts are some of the benefits that can result from a well-
managed and executed integrity management system.
Managing brownfield
assets

The cost of remaining the same

Wrong Risks Failure to Incomple

choice increased/n deliver full te
ot potential value picture
addressed
A standardised approach to Integrity
Management across assets is not
easy
Facilitie Equipment
s
Pipelin
Exploration and
es
Production
Structure
s
Refinin
g Pressure
Vessels
Processin Static
g Equipment
Rotating
Distributio Equipment
n Instrumentatio
n

Offshor

e
Core elements of Asset
Integrity
HSE Critical Equipment
& Performance
Standards

HSE Critical Records

Act Plan
Integrity Review

Inspect Test and

Examine
Check Do
Assurance, Verification &
Certification

Management of Change

Fabricate, Modify Decomm

Desig Commission Operate Maintain
Erect, & &
n
Install Repair
Disposal
Common integrity issuesacross the
lifecycle

Cost constraints or Modified or non optimal Asset

Desig
replication of design n Integrity and Maintenance
strategy required for
operations.

Non-compliance with Increased maintenance, inbuilt

procedures to meet Fabricate, Erect, degradation issues, inaccessible
schedule, poor Install locations
quality workmanship

Handover of non- Additional work at 1st shutdown,

start-up critical Commission revised maintenance strategies,
packages, non- constant catch up
compliance with
procedures
Common integrity issuesacross the
lifecycle

New technology on Greenfield and brownfield

Operat
tie ins to existing e integrity and
infrastructure maintenance procedures
not aligned
Obsolescence and OEM strategy no
Maintai
new technology n longer valid

New equipment, Modify Required updated strategy,

change in field & Repai change in frequency,
conditions, r
mothballing different competencies

Integrity required Decomm Unknown condition or

for lifting, & deteriorated equipment can
equipment required Disposal cause over engineering
for cleaning
 So… how do we
change behaviour?
 Driving
Improvement
Create a blended team with a mix of expertise to own the
process
• Corporate leads
• Asset focal points
• Advisory team to drive process and provide technical
support.
Improvement

Transform:
Improve:
Achieve leading integrity
performance through
Analyse performance: Develop and deliver local integrated improvement
integrity improvement programme
Understand current level plans with central support
Define performance: to build core AI capabilities
of integrity performance in
key selected assets in the asset
Develop a common
through KPIs and asset
understanding of what
assessments
good looks like and create
supporting standards,
guidelines and tools

Time
Identify
Requirements
• High level review of current
processes and procedures
• Understanding appetite for risk
Quantification of acceptable risk
• Understand current
challenges; identify key asset
types
• Test against industry
best practice
Identify
priorities
• Identify key areas for
improvement
process
Very High

• Identify good practice and key

5

High

champions so quick wins can

4

Consequence
Medium

be shared
3

Medium
Low
2

• Establish integrated working Low

1

group for driving

1 2 3 4 5
Low Medium Low Medium High Very High
Probability

improvement
AIM
• Enable Operations/Maintenance
teams to take ownership PIMS FIMS WIMS SIMS
Develop the
detail
Some closing
considerations
• What is your COMPANY driver
for implementing Asset Integrity
improvements?
• Is there a link between
Production losses and
Asset Integrity?
• Are safety/environment
incidence on the
increase?
• Is compliance with the
Corporate Integrity
Procedures measured?
• In your asset where are the
key perceived issues across
the business?
Who we
are

INTECSEA collaborates with clients, contractors and

competitors to turn complex challenges into
practical results. Our capability, combined with that
of the WorleyParsons and Advisian offers clients a
single integrated, full lifecycle project delivery
service.

Advisian provides strategic and business-level

consulting, integrated with deep technical
expertise, across the entire asset lifecycle with
a truly global footprint.
Advisian
WorleyParsons offers our clients specialists in
full project delivery of large, complex,
strategically important projects.

WorleyParson
s
Delivering Projects to the
World

INTECSEA Office
Locations
WorleyParsons Office
Locations

Specialist Offshore Acquired by WorleyParsons in 2008

Integrated into Advisian in 2015
Engineering Consultancy
Dedicated professional engineers across all
founded in 1984 continents
DISCLAIMER

This presentation has been prepared by a representative of INTECSEA.

The presentation contains the professional and personal opinions of the presenter, which are given in good faith. As such, opinions presented herein may not always necessarily reflect the position of
INTECSEA as a whole, its officers or executive.

Any forward-looking statements included in this presentation will involve subjective judgment and analysis and are subject to uncertainties, risks and contingencies—many of which are outside the
control of, and may be unknown to, INTECSEA.

INTECSEA and all associated entities and representatives make no representation or warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information in this document and do not take responsibility
for updating any information or correcting any error or omission that may become apparent after this document has been issued.

To the extent permitted by law, INTECSEA and its officers, employees, related bodies and agents disclaim all liability—direct, indirect or consequential (and whether or not arising out of the negligence,
default or lack of care of INTECSEA and/or any of its agents)—for any loss or damage suffered by a recipient or other persons arising out of, or in connection with, any use or reliance on this
presentation or information.