2D DC Imaging
2D DC Imaging
Fourier Transform
Matrix Formulation
Fourier Transform
Numerical simulation
Pseudo-section
Mathematical model
Mathematical model
Fourier Transform
Numerical simulation
Pseudo-section
Fourier Transform
► Fourier Transform
● Potential distribution ϕ is transformed from the 3D
space into a 2D space (,,) using Fourier Transform
dy
and
=
Fourier Transform
► So, transforming above equations in Fourier space,
=Q̃δ()
{σ(x,z)}+σ(x,z)-σ(x,z)-2
=-2 Q̃δ()
Where Q̃ =
Work Plan
Equation of Continuity
Simplification
Mathematical model
Fourier Transform
Matrix Formulation
Potential Distribution ϕ
Inverse Fourier Transform
Pseudo-section
Discretization of the Problem
►Generalized form of above equations can be written as,
; (x,z) ε R
which is assumed to be closed and connected, to have a non-
void interior and to have a sufficiently regular boundary Ӷ with
outward normal η on which
Fourier Transform
Discretization of the
problem and BCs
Matrix Formulation
Pseudo-section
Numerical Algorithm
► Finite Difference Method
● For interior Nodes
□ At any node in the set R, Φ̃ (x,) must satisfy the equation
{σ(x,z)}+σ(x,z)-σ(x,z)-2
=-2 Q̃δ()
The two-dimensional partial differential operator
is applied on and
Numerical Algorithm
□ At any node (i,j) with irregular grid-spacing in x- and
z-direction the operator on any distribution of , could
be approximated by the finite difference equation as
Numerical Algorithm
□Application of the difference operator of
generalized equation to the above equation for
any interior node
(i,j) of the grid results in the discretized form
given below.
++
=2Q̃δ()δ()
Numerical Algorithm
□ In notational form above equation can be written as
Where ,
,
, ,
Numerical Algorithm
► ɸ̃ at node (i, j) is dependent only on the values of ɸ̃ at
the adjacent nodes (i,j-1),(i,j+1),(i-1,j), and (i+1,j). C
are functions of the geometry of the discretization grid
and the physical property values , and hence known at
all nodes in the set R.
Numerical Algorithm
● For boundary nodes
a) For nodes located on the line z=0
For all nodes (i,j) with j=2,3,…..M-1, i=1,
Where ,
, and
Numerical Algorithm
b) For the top, left, and right corner nodes
located on the line z=0
□ For the top left corner node (1,1)
Where ,
–
and α=
□ For the top right corner node (1,M)
Where ,
and -
Numerical Algorithm
Where ,
,
-
Numerical Algorithm
Where ,
and -
-
□ for the bottom right corner node (N,M
Where ,
and -
Numerical Algorithm
e) For nodes located on the left edge of the
mesh
The difference equation for the nodes (i,1), for
i=2,3,…..N-1, has the form given below
Where ,
and -
Numerical Algorithm
f) For nodes located on the right edge of the
mesh
The difference equation for the nodes (i,M), for
i=2,3,…..N-1, that are on the edge
corresponding to , is given below
and -
Work Plan
Equation of Continuity
Simplification
Mathematical model
Fourier Transform
Matrix Formulation
Pseudo-section
Matrix Formulation
► All the above equations for interior nodes and boundary
nodes can be written in matrix form as
The
matrix C is called the
Capacitance matrix
which is a function
of the geometry and
the physical property
distribution in the grid. Sample nodes numbering convention for rectangular grids.
Matrix Formulation
► The matrix C is blocktridiagonal, sparse and banded.
Matrix Formulation
► For ‘C’ as non-symmetric and banded, the best way
of solving these system of linear equations is the
Gaussian elimination algorithm.
Work Plan
Equation of Continuity
Simplification
Mathematical model
Fourier Transform
Matrix Formulation
Pseudo-section
Inverse Fourier Transform
►In order to find out potential in three-dimensional
space, the potential which has been calculated in the
Fourier space will have to go through the inverse Fourier
transform
► Numerical Example
grid using the horizontal and vertical values
0
-20 0.018
-40 0.016
variation in vertical direction
-60 0.014
0.012
-80
0.01
-100
0.008
-120
0.006
-140
0.004
-160
0.002
-180
Mathematical model
Fourier Transform
Matrix Formulation
Pseudo-section
Pseudo-section
► Plot the data from a 2-D imaging survey, the pseudo-
section contouring plot is normally used.
►Gives a very approximate picture of the true sub-
surface resistivity distribution but a distorted picture of
the subsurface as the shapes of the contours depend
on the type of array used as well as the true subsurface
resistivity.
Pseudo-section
pseudo-section plot
0
-20
-40
-60
ps eudo-depth(m )
-80
-100
-120
-140
-160
-180
-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500
Earth model
Earth model
►Model 3
An assumed model of a vertical two dimensional dyke like
structure having length 20m and width 40m is present 10m below
from the surface. The resistivity of the body is 100 ohm-m and
the background resistivity is 10 ohm-m.
Flow
Chart
of
2D
Inversion
Steps
Field data
Computed Data
Inversion approach-2