DBS IDEAL CURATED - Case Study - Screening Solution V1
DBS IDEAL CURATED - Case Study - Screening Solution V1
Screening
Problem Statement (Screening criteria)
In the age of large-scale tech disruption in the Financial Services sector we have witnessed the advent of many Fintech platforms providing
services to corporate clients in new and innovative ways whilst the banking sector has remained largely focused on pushing products via legacy
platforms and any game changing innovations have not been seen in the space.
Keeping the above in mind, deep dive into the space and the IDEAL platform and propose how the same can move beyond its current scope as a
transactional platform to being a one stop shop for all client needs.
Keep the below guiding principles in mind while approaching the above problem statement:-
1. Curated:- Many platforms/applications across sectors incorporate consumer behavior to ensure a more curated experience for the user,
these applications also push products/services basis past activity and other intelligence/data gathered from multiple sources.
2. Bank Agnostic:- Explore how the IDEAL platform can move beyond its current scope and offer products/services which are bank agnostic.
Turning it into a platform that clients can use for B2B interactions/transactions etc.
3. Consumer Analytics:- Explore how IDEAL can use its client data or data from third-party providers to provide rich analytics to its users in a
consumable format.
4. Information Rich:- Should IDEAL integrate with information providers like Bloomberg/WSJ etc. to provide real time news and market data ?
And if so how and where does one consume this ?
5. Delivery/UI:- Go through the IDEAL User Interface and processes/functionality defined in slide one and see how this can be changed for a
better User Experience. Can onboarding be easier, can we use the log in page for showing more info ?
The above points are for guidance purpose, please don’t restrict your proposals to the same. Also be cognizant of RBI regulations on the banking
space while drafting your proposals, without being completely restricted by them.
2
Screening criteria
Judging Parameters:
Screening:
• Reports with research (data) from end customers across all 5 points mentioned in Problem Statement
• Your recommendations to the bank
Prelims:
• Basis Number of corporates interviewed by each team (min of 15 sample size by each) – highest sample gets more points
• Corporates spanning across “Large organisations”, “Startups”, “Fintechs”, “MSME” segments
• Quality of Market research data been presented basis corporate interviews (as per the Expected outcome guidelines/topics) + Your recommendations to the Bank
• Comparative analysis drawn across “Customer Needs” and “Banking Solutions Availability”.
• More points for practical case-studies of “digital adoption trends in current sample size” (banking & corporate houses – both)
Evaluation Methodology
1) Research Content & Context: 30
2) Quality of Recommendations: 20
3) Outcome summary concise & clarity: 20
4) No of Corporate (sample size): 15
5) Overall presentation: 15
5
Expected Outcome
• Report on the following:
• Relevance of banking channels with the advent and rise of Fintech's covering trust/faith in banking channels
• Are corporate customers looking out for best practices across peers/other players to improve efficiency in their business
• Customers willing to adopt latest digital trends in banking
• Customers “OK” with the idea of “Open Banking” i.e. single bank being able to serve their needs across banks
• Report in form of a PPT / PDF and a presentation for inferences based on the research undertaken
• Report to consist to sample size undertaken, questionnaire survey result and brief concluding synopsis
• Recommendations will be analysed critically