Classification and Measures of Human Strength
Classification and Measures of Human Strength
AND MEASURES OF
HUMAN STRENGTHS
AND POSITIVE OUTCOMES
1. The Gallup Themes of Talent (Buckingham & Clifton, 2001) as measured by the Clifton
StrengthsFinder and the Clifton Youth Strengths Explorer
2. The Values in Action (VIA) Classification of Strengths (Peterson & Seligman, 2004) as measured by
the adult and youth versions of the VIA Inventory of Strengths
3. The Search Institute's 40 Developmental Assets (Benson, Leffert, Scales, & Blyth, 1998) as measured
by the Search Institute Profiles of Student Life: Attitudes and Behaviors
Strength
We will discuss the present three frameworks, along with measures of strengths and their
Many more…..
THE VIA
CLASSIFICATION OF
STRENGTHS
Christopher Peterson’s Values In Action
◦ Peterson and Seligman make the point that we currently have a shared
language for speaking about the negative side of psychology, but we
have no such equivalent terminology for describing human strengths.
◦ Peterson and Seligman and many colleagues decided that components of character included
Virtues (core characteristics valued by some moral philosophers, religious thinkers, and
everyday folk),
Character Strengths (psychological processes and mechanisms that define virtues), and
Situational Themes (specific habits that lead people to manifest strengths in particular
situations).
6 Overarching Virtues
1. Wisdom and Knowledge- Cognitive strengths that entail the acquisition and
use of knowledge
◦ The Search Institute's 40 Developmental Assets are considered commonsense, positive experiences and
qualities and are identified as reflecting primary contributors to the thriving of young people.
◦ The Developmental Assets framework categorizes assets according to external and internal groups of 20
assets each.
◦ The 20 external assets are the positive experiences that children and youth gain through interactions
with people and institutions; the 20 internal assets are those personal characteristics and behaviors that
stimulate the positive development of young people.
EXTERNAL
ASSETS
INTERNAL
ASSETS
Social
Competencies Positive Identity
POSITIVE OUTCOMES FOR ALL
DIMENSIONS OF WELL-BEING
◦ Happiness (spontaneous reflections of pleasant and unpleasant feelings in one's immediate experience)
and life satisfaction (a sense of contentment and peace stemming from small gaps between wants and
needs) are of major interest in the positive psychology field.
◦ Subjective well-being (also referred to as emotional well-being and happiness), such as the emotional
model posited by Diener and others (Diener, 1984; Diener, Suh, Lucas, & Smith, 1999), suggest that
individuals' appraisals of their own lives capture the essence of well-being.
◦ Objective approaches to understanding psychological well-being and social well-being have been
proposed by Ryff (1989) and Keyes (1998), respectively.
◦ Psychological and social well-being provide useful frameworks for conceptualizing human functioning.
Cont…
◦ Emotional well-being consists of perceptions of avowed happiness and satisfaction with life, along with the
balance of positive and negative affects.
◦ This threefold structure of emotional well-being consists of life satisfaction, positive affect, and the absence of
negative affect.
◦ Psychological well-being: Self-acceptance, personal growth, purpose in life, environmental mastery, autonomy,
and positive relations with others are the six components of Ryff's conceptualization of positive functioning.
◦ This model of well-being has been investigated in numerous studies, and the findings reveal that the six
dimensions are independent, though correlated, constructs of well-being.