This document discusses interpleader suits and summary procedure under the Civil Procedure Code. [1] An interpleader suit allows a plaintiff to call upon rival claimants of a debt or property before the court to get their claims decided. [2] Certain conditions must be met before filing an interpleader suit, including two persons claiming the same debt/property adversely. [3] Summary procedure under Order 37 allows for expedited recovery of debts and liquidated sums through restrictions on the defendant's right to defend.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views8 pages
In Terp Leader
This document discusses interpleader suits and summary procedure under the Civil Procedure Code. [1] An interpleader suit allows a plaintiff to call upon rival claimants of a debt or property before the court to get their claims decided. [2] Certain conditions must be met before filing an interpleader suit, including two persons claiming the same debt/property adversely. [3] Summary procedure under Order 37 allows for expedited recovery of debts and liquidated sums through restrictions on the defendant's right to defend.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8
Civil Procedure Code
Interpleader Suits (Sec 88 Order
35) • “To interplead” connotes “to litigate with each other to settle a point concerning a third party.” • The primary object of filing an interpleader suit to get claims of rival defendants adjudicated. It is the process wherein the plaintiff calls upon the rival claimants to appear before the court and get their respective claims decided. • A suit does not become interpleader suit merely because the plaintiff requires the defendants to interplead with each other as regards one of the prayers in the plaint. While deciding whether the suit is an interpleader one, the court must have regard to all the prayers in the plaint. Conditions (Section 88):
Before institution of interpleader suit, following conditions must be
satisfied: 1) There must be some debt, sum of money or other property movable or immovable in dispute; 2) Two persons must be claiming it adversely to one another; 3) The person from whom such debt, money or property is claimed must not be claiming interest therein other than the charges and costs and he must be ready and willingly to pay or deliver it to the rightful claimant; and 4) There must be no suit pending wherein the rights of rival claimants can be properly adjudicated. Procedure (Order 35, Rule 1): • In every interpleader suit, the plaint must also state:- 1) that the plaintiff claims no interest in the subject matter in dispute, other than for charges or costs; 2) that the claims made by the defendants severally; 3) that there is no collusion between the plaintiff and any of the defendants. Summary Procedure (Order 37) • Order 37 provides summary procedure in suits based on negotiable instruments or where the plaintiff seeks to recover debt or liquated damages. • In a summary suit , the defendant is not entitled to a right of defense like in an ordinary suit. Object – • The underlying object behind it is to prevent unreasonable obstruction by the defendant who has no defense and to assist expeditious disposal of cases. • The provisions of Order 37 apply to (a) High Courts, (b) City Civil Courts, (c) Courts of small causes, and (d) other courts (the High Court may restrict the operation of this Code to such suits as it deems proper) to: a) Suits upon bills of exchange, hundies and promissory notes, and b) Suits in which the plaintiff seeks only to recover a debt or liquidated demand in money payable by the defendant, with or without interest, arising:- a.) on a written contract, or b.) on an enactment, where the sum sought to be recovered is a fixed sum of money or in the nature of a debt other than a penalty, or c.) on a guarantee, where the claim against the principal is in respect of a debt or liquidated demand only. • The plaint shall contain a specific averment that the suit is filed under Order 37; and that a relief which falls with the ambit of this rule has been claimed. The summons of the suit has to be issued to the defendant. The defendant is not entitled to defend a summary suit unless he enters an appearance. In default of this, the plaintiff will be entitled to a decree which will be executed forthwith. (Rule 2) • The defendant must appear within 10 days of service of summons. • Rule 3 (5) lays down that the defendant must apply for “leave to defend” within 10 days from the date of service of summons for judgment upon him. Such leave will be granted only if the affidavit filed by the defendant disclose such facts as may be deemed sufficient to entitle him to defend. Such leave to defend may be granted conditional or unconditional. • Principle for granting leave to defend:- There can be no hard and fast rule as to in what cases leave to defend can be granted. This all depend on facts and circumstances and the discretion must be exercised judicially and in consonance with the principles of natural justice. However the court as a general rule grant leave when a prima facie defense is made out or there is a triable issue. In Kiranmoyee Desai v. Chatterjee , Calcutta HC laid down following rules – • If the defendant raises a triable issue , indicating he has a bona fide defense the leave to defend should be granted • If the defendant’s defense is sham or illusory leave to defend should be refused • If the defendant satisfies the court he has good defense to claim on merits, the plaintiff is not entitles to leave to sign judgement and the defendant is entitled to unconditional leave to defend,