Discourse Analysis: Dr. Muhammad Shahbaz M.shahbaz@gcwus - Edu.pk 0345-6725710
Discourse Analysis: Dr. Muhammad Shahbaz M.shahbaz@gcwus - Edu.pk 0345-6725710
writtenSemiotics
or Extended
spoken language
c
P
or
a
u
c
rti
sc
e
e
I
n
t
e
r
t
e
x
t
u
a
l
i
t
y
Discourse with Small ‘d’ and Capital ‘D’
Interacting
"d"
discourse Behaving Valuing
refers to the
features of D
language
Nonverbal Non-verbal aspects of speech, such as tone of voice, pauses, gestures, and sounds
like “um”, can reveal aspects of a speaker’s intentions, attitudes, and emotions.
communication
Conversational The interaction between people in a conversation, such as turn-taking,
interruptions and listener response, can reveal aspects of cultural conventions
Codes and social roles.
Functional Approach: Communicative Forces
Narrative Descriptive
Persuasive Argumentative
Features of Discourse
1. Cohesion
Links and ties within the text
2. Coherence
What makes a text semantically meaningful
3. Intentionality
The message must be conveyed.
4. Acceptability
Approval from the receivers
5. Informativeness
Some new information must be included in the discourse.
6. Situationality
Setting and circumstances
7. Intertextuality
Reference to the world outside the world
APPROACHES TO DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
Ethnography… understands the social world in terms of the ‘lived experience’ of those who inhabit it.
…..Observations, interviews, field notes, lived experiences or narratives of participants
CA …..Language as social Practice……concern with the sequential organization of actions, and, in particular the
mechanics of turn-taking….. conversational analysts work on naturally occurring and closely transcribed
conversational data.
Variation Analysis: The study of the way language varies in communities of speakers. This concentrates on the
interaction of social factors (such as a speaker’s gender, ethnicity, age, degree of integration into their community,
etc.) and linguistic structures (such as sounds, syntactic forms, intonation features, words, etc.).
Recent approach to DA
If in traditional studies discourses were analysed in relation to
social processes that form them, then recently researchers
started talking about bidirectional and complex relations
between discourses and social practices:
Critical Key theorists are Norman Fairclough, Ruth Wodak and Teun
van Dijk but many others, bringing together many
approaches.
Discourse
Analysis They share a common view of language as a means of social
construction: language both shapes and is shaped by society.
CDA focus— Text, talk and visuals to have the holistic view
and in-depth understanding and exploration.
Main Characteristics of works in CDA
Sexism
Problem or issue racism
oriented colonialism
or
other relevant social
problems
Grammar,
Schematic
organization, Style,
Rhetoric
Speech Acts
Pragmatics
strategies and
interactions.
Involves
Semiotics:
CDA not only Verbal Signs, Pictures,
Films,
sounds, music,
gestures
A Few Examples of CDA Application
Focus on group
Problem or relations of power,
issue oriented dominance &
inequality
Concordance Analysis
• The analysis is conducted by interpreting concordance patterns (a list of all the occurrences
of a particular search term in a corpus presented within the context they occur in.
Key-Words Analysis
• Here the analysis is based on key words which are the lexical items that show
marked frequency in one text compared to another.
Why use CADA?
Baker(2006) outlined following advantages of Corpus based approaches:
Corpus tools by providing many examples of a given linguistic
feature can ensure a greater degree of objectivity than can a
qualitative analysis
It offers triangulation.
Multimodal Discourse Analysis
Multimodality entered linguistics through the groundbreaking work of Kress and
Van Leeuwen in Reading Images (1996) and Multimodal Discourse (2001).
Texts which linguists study create meanings not only through language but
also through visual features and elements such as images, colour, the layout of
pages, even through material objects and architecture.
In multimodal communication, the different modes had become more
integrated and visual elements were being used to communicate complex ideas
and attitudes.
Besides linguistic patterns other modalities such as pictures, films, or video,
images and sounds.
What Kress and Van Leeuwen presented was the possibility of taking the
power of description so useful for drawing out buried ideologies
Tools and Processes for Efficiently Managing Qualitative
Research
The Transana software: Transana offers multimedia integration and tools for
transcription and analysis of audiovisual data. It is distinguished from other software
packages that tend to favor textual analysis (https://www.transana.com/).
Atlas.ti (similarly to NVIVO below) supports large volumes of data sources in
multiple formats, including websites and social media.
The NVIVO database can be deployed to process multimodal data e.g., transcribe
audiovisual data, format interviews and discussion groups, download data from the
Internet, create projects, import sources, and link data to external sources and
analyze images.
NVIVO also supports diverse formats of data i.e., text, multimedia, PDFs, images,
Excel surveys, notes, websites and social media such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter,
YouTube videos and Survey Monkey
Mediated Discourse
Mediated discourse analysis, an approach to discourse developed by Ronand Suzanne Scollon in
the late 1990’s
Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis (FCDA) builds on the tenets of CDA and has
been described as "a political perspective on gender, concerned with demystifying
the interrelationships of gender, power, and ideology in discourse" (Lazar, 2007, p.
144).
Lazar explains that feminist CDA includes: (1) feminist analytical resistance or
activism; (2) the assumption that “gender” is an ideological structure; (3) a
recognition of the complexity of gender and power relations; (4) attention to the
role of discourse in the (de)construction of gender; and (5) critical reflexivity as
praxis (Lazar, 2010; Lazar, 2007).
Discourse Stylistics
Bachmann Ingo (2011) Civil partnership – “gay marriage in all but name”: a corpus-driven analysis of
discourses of same-sex relationships in the UK Parliament. "Corpora”, vol. 6 (1), s. 77-105
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London:
Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London:
Edward Arnold.
Widdowson, H. G. (1998b). The theory and practice of Critical Discourse Analysis. Applied Linguistics,
19: 136–151.
An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics, John Sinclair, 2005.
https://www.press.umich.edu/pdf/9780472033850-part1.pdf · PDF file
McEnery, A., Xiao, R. and Tono, Y. (2006) Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource
Book. London & New York: Routledge
Leech, Geoffrey. (1992). Claimed and unclaimed Resources of Corpus Linguistics.
htl.linguist.univ-paris-diderot.fr/leon/leon_hs.pdf · PDF file