Objectives of the Assessment

Promote the vertical linkage among the provincial, city, and municipal
plans, especially within the context of a sustainable ecosystem
management as means to achieve resilience, and encourage inter-LGU
partnership and resource-sharing for ecosystem-wide investments.

Emphasize the use of technical and scientific information, including

those related to CCA and DRR, to underpin the formulation of an
evidence-based plan.

Encourage the active participation and contribution of LGU partners

and stakeholders from among the different sectoral and societal
institutions in the public, private, and civil society sector.
Objectives of the Assessment
Strengthen linkages among the different local plans, especially among
the CLUP, CDP, LCCAP, and LDRRMP to foster consistency in strategies
and approaches in development policies, targets, programs, projects,
services, and activities, to optimize limited local resources and maximize
the development results, especially towards long-term resilience;

Advocate the mainstreaming of development concerns into the CDP

Deepen the appreciation of LGUs for the logical steps entailed in the
CDP formulation
Mechanics
Self – Assessment by C/MLGUs

Assessment of Sanggunian-approved CDP (official)

Assessment prior to Sanggunian-approval of the

CDP
Summary of Overall
Interpretation
Rating Form Process Content
Full compliance All forms were All the preparatory All the sections of
submitted and consultative the CDP complied
processes were duly with the indicated
undertaken quality parameters

Partial compliance At least one form is At least one step At least one section
missing was not duly of the CDP failed to
undertaken meet the indicated
quality parameters

Non-compliance No forms were All the steps were All the sections of
submitted not duly undertaken the CDP failed to
meet the indicated
quality parameters
Component I – Form
Component I looks into the
presence of required forms or its
equivalent alternative and
supporting planning documents
Notes:
 Column 1. List of required planning
forms and documents
 Column 2a. Form number as identified
in the CDP Illustrative Guide (DILG,
2016)
 Column 2b. Acceptable
substitute/alternative documents in lieu
of the required forms/documents
 Column 3. Put a check () if
corresponding required or
acceptable forms and documents
are present during the assessment,
otherwise put (x)
 Column 4. Indicate comments or
observations relative to extent of
compliance, if any (e.g. alternative
document presented by the C/M)
 1. Form 1b
Major activities:
Team Mobilization
Data gathering / updating
Conduct of CDRA or any similar process
CLUP Formulation*
Medium-Term Comprehensive
Development Planning
Finalization of Plans
Plan Adoption and Approval

*If the timing of the CLUP and CDP formulation

does not coincide, the C/MLGU may submit
only the workplan for the CDP formulation

Alternative: Workplan / Activity Design

 2. Form 1c
Five (5) development sectors – Social, Economic,
Infrastructure, Environment, and Institutional

To confirm the conduct of CDRA or related tool,

the C/M can attach any of the following as
annexes to the CDP:
RHEV maps from CLUP and/or CDRA or
related assessments
Climate change projections
Historical records of past disasters
Technical results from CLUP and/or CDRA or
related assessments
Other technical data produced

GHG Inventory
Alternative: Socio-Economic Profile (SEP), Socio-
Economic and Physical Profile (SEPP) or special
sectoral studies subsumed in the CLUP
3. Form 1d
Should contain indicators for the five
development sectors, broken down into
barangays, districts or any appropriate
geographic scope within the LGU jurisdiction.

Data must not be older than 10 years prior to

year 1 of CDP scope (e.g., if CDP covers 2020,
the data to be used should be at least dated
2010.

Check presence of DRR-CCA indicators for

each development sector

Alternative: Narrative analysis on the three

(3) dimensions (sectoral, spatial, and
temporal) subsumed in the SEP, SEPP, or EP
 4. Form 2a/2b
Should contain the long list of PPAs
per five (5) development sectors.
This list will be the main source of
PPAs that will later be prioritized
for implementation (LDIP Stream
1).

Check if PPAs reflect DRR and

CCAM intended to reduce the risks
and vulnerabilities of the sectors

Alternative: any document

reflecting the identified PPAs may
be accepted.
 5. Form 3a
Should contain prioritized PPAs
which resulted from a
prioritization exercise

Documentation of the process or

workshop outputs of prioritization
exercise need to be presented to
the CDP-TAC.

For each development sector,

there should be a ranked list of
PPAs.

Alternative:
- LDIP Summary Form (Form
3e) as long as the sectoral
PPAs are ranked
- Workshop outputs of
prioritization exercises
6. Form 3b
Each project brief has the following information:
- Name and type of project
- Project components
- Estimated cost
- Justification of the project
- Target beneficiaries
- Target outputs or success indicators
- Possible risk or external factors
- Expected private sector response

Project briefs for PPAs with DRR and CCA

objectives and for PPAs to be funded by 5%
LDRRMP will be required, especially as they will
also be subsequently tagged in the LDIP and AIP.

Alternative: Project Profiles (title of the project,

brief description, project justification, location,
cost, beneficiaries, timeframe, and project
proponent)
 7. Form 3c
Should contain the C/M’s projected local
revenue, expenditure and surplus for 3
years.

Check if the form is approved by the

local finance committee (LFC)

Alternative: any document/form

containing 3-year
projections/forecast on total revenue,
expenditure, and surplus of the C/M
may be accepted
8. Form 3d
Should contain the C/M’s
financing plan for 3 years.
Check if the form is
approved by the local
finance committee (LFC)

Alternative: any
document/form containing
3-year projection of
revenues and
expenditures
 9. Form 3e

Should contain priority PPAs to

be implemented within a period
of 3 years. Timeframe and years
covered should be indicated

Check if:
- LDIP followed the template
(Form 3e) as prescribed in the
DILG-NEDA-DBM-DOF JMC
2016-01

Note: C/M should use the

prescribed LDIP summary
Form (Form 3e). No other
document/form will be
accepted.
10. Form 4

Should follow the template (Form 4) as

prescribed in the DILG- NEDA-DBM-DOF
JMC 2016-01

The annual climate change adaptation and

mitigation PPAs are tagged with
corresponding typologies as prescribed in
the DBM- CCC-DILG JMC 2015-01: Revised
Guidelines for Tagging/Tracking Climate
Change Expenditures in the Local Budget.

Note: C/M should use the prescribed AIP

summary Form (Form 4). No other
document/form will be accepted.
11. Form 5a

Should contain capability building

interventions and development
strategies, programs, and
initiatives, desired outcome and
implementation details.

Alternative: Any document

containing capability building
interventions and development
strategies, programs, and
initiatives may be accepted.
12. Form 5b

Should contain priority legislations/ local

ordinances that need to be enacted by the
C/M’s Sanggunian at a given timeframe; and
the committee responsible for the particular
legislative requirement

Check if identified legislations/local

ordinances support development
priorities/strategies

Alternative: Any document containing the

priority legislations to support the
implementation of programs and projects
may be accepted.
13. Form 6a*

Note: The form will be submitted

annually, but it is suggested that
the form be prepared during CDP
formulation, deriving data from
the project briefs
 14. Form 6b

Should contain measures and parameters

for the proper assessment of
development PPAs, legislation, and
CapDev implementation

More specifically, it should contain

indicators to be monitored, data sources,
collection method, frequency of
collection, and responsible office

Alternative: Any document containing

the M&E strategy capturing measures
and parameters for proper assessment
of PPAs, legislations, and CapDev
Implementation[=
 Summary

Indicate number of forms

checked/presented
Documents

Indicate
number of
documents
presented
Component II: Process

 Extent of institutional partnership,

consultations, and linkages

 Ensures that planning is consultative,

participatory, and inclusive
Component II: Process
This component looks into the proof of participatory
meetings, consultations, workshops conducted as evidenced
by the following acceptable documents (any of the
following):

• Copies of Resolutions by the council/committee

• Minutes of the meeting
• Post-activity reports
• Certified true copy of attendance sheets
…duly approved by the Mayor, C/MPDC, or any appropriate
official or functionary
**Photographs not supported by documentation are not acceptable
proofs**
What are required preparatory and consultative
meetings, consultations, and workshops?

A. Preparatory Meetings

Meetings of Planning Team on Orientation, Tasking,

Implementation Strategies, and Scheduling of Activities

B. Meetings or Consultations of the LDC on the CDP

preparation

1. EP validation
2. Project call – long list of PPAs
3. Prioritization of Projects
4. Approval of the CDP and LDIP
What are required preparatory and consultative
meetings, consultations, and workshops?

C. Meetings or Consultations of the City/Municipal with the

PPDO
1. Provincial and C/M goals and strategies
2. PPAs and Investment programs

D. Meetings, Consultations, or Workshops with Sector

Groups to include NGOs and POs on CDP/LDIP (profiling,
project call, project prioritization, and approval)
1. Economic Sector 4. Institutional Sector
2. Social Sector 5.
Physical/Infrastructure Sector
3. Environment Sector
What are required preparatory and consultative
meetings, consultations, and workshops?

D. Meetings, Consultations, or Workshops with Local

Special Bodies and Advisory Councils (profiling, project
call, project prioritization, and approval)

1. Local Finance Committee 6. Local Health Board

2. Peace and Order Council 7. C/MWRMC*
3. Local School Board 8.
C/MFARMC*
4. LDRRMC 9.
Youth Development Council
5. LSWMC 10.
Others Advisory Council
and sectoral or
functional committee
What are required preparatory and consultative
meetings, consultations, and workshops?

D. Meetings, Consultations, or Workshops with Local

Special Bodies and Advisory Councils (profiling, project
call, project prioritization, and approval)

1. Local Finance Committee 6. Local Health Board

2. Peace and Order Council 7. C/MWRMC*
3. Local School Board 8.
C/MFARMC*
4. LDRRMC 9.
Youth Development Council
5. LSWMC 10.
Others Advisory Council
and sectoral or
functional
committee
How to fill-up BLGD CAT Form 1-B:
Component II - Process?
Important benchmarks to include:

1. Inclusion of DRR-CCA sector representative in the

planning structure
2. Participation of DRR-CCA sector in (i) data gathering for
LDIS and EP; (b) situation analysis (VRG, PSF); and (c)
prioritization of PPAs
3. Participation of NGO representatives in (i) data
gathering for LDIS and EP; (b) situation analysis (VRG,
PSF); and (c) prioritization of PPAs
C/M LGU to indicate if complementary
activities below were undertaken:

1. Consultation with the LDRRMC in the CDP

Preparation
2. C/MLGU representative participated in any
ecosystem-related assessment
3. CDP TWG participated in CDRA

**C/M LGU may also indicate whether it has engaged

institutional partners
COMPONENT III:
CONTENT
 Quality
 Alignment
 A.Quality of Vision and Ecological Profile

VISION
 has both outward and inward looking perspective
 Contains element descriptors (5 development sectors)
and corresponding success indicators
 Risk-informed – considered the result of CDRA
1. Vision, goals and objectives GOALS
are linked, long term, strategic,  Each development sector has goal statement/s
and realistic  Sectoral goals are based on the results of situational
analysis – VRG, PSFM, map overlay analysis, etc.
 Goals focus on reduction, prevention and mitigation of
climate and hazard risks and/or climate change
adaptation/ mitigation
OBJECTIVES
 SMART
 Consistent with sectoral goals
 Can be attained within the planning timeframe of
CLUP/CDP
 A.Quality of Vision and Ecological Profile

ECOLOGICAL PROFILE

2. Comprehensive Ecological Profile  Includes relevant and updated information and

contains the ff. info: statistics on the current status of the 5
Situational analysis/ observed development sectors
conditions  Results of situational analysis (VRG, LDIS, PSFM) are
Issues and concerns or unmet discussed per sector/sub-sector in the EP
needs  Includes existing sectoral PPAs and legislations,
VRG analysis accomplishments and issues – used as a take-off
point for analysis and determination of
development strategies
 A.Quality of Vision and Ecological Profile

ECOLOGICAL PROFILE
 Utilized the ff:
 Identification of vulnerable sectoral groups and dev’t
sectors
 Identification of fragile locations, such as barangays and
districts
2. Comprehensive Ecological Profile  Identification of natural hazards and climate change
contains the ff info: stimuli
Situational analysis/ observed  Records of past disasters and their impacts
conditions  Results of other studies/tools: CBMS, DPA, Infra Audit,
Issues and concerns or unmet needs etc..
 Hazards and risks from sectoral studies
VRG analysis
 Risk assessment in CLUP
 Location-specific sources of man-made hazards: dams,
oil depot, mining, etc…
 Technical and scientific mapping
 Climate change projections
 Ridge-to-reef information
 A.Quality of Vision and Ecological Profile

EPSFM
3. Expanded Problem  Reflects the concerns in item 2 above that are relevant
Solution Finding Matrix to the C/M.
(EPSFM) contains  If a PSFM is not used, findings must be processed to
Vulnerability and Risk enable the identification of corresponding PPAs and
assessments local legislations
 B. Quality of PPAs

PPAs
 Accomplished Form 2a per sector contains PPAs that
1. PPAs are responsive to the are responsive to issues and concerns resulting from
issues, problems, and gaps as situational analysis
made evident in the ecological  Identified issues and concerns in the EP have
profile and LDIS corresponding PPAs and/or legislations
 There is logical and consistent linkage between
columns 1,2 and 3 of Form 1d and columns 1,2,3, and
4 of Form 2a.
 If using other format, check for the linkage of PPAs
with issues resulting from situational analysis
B. Quality of PPAs

PPAs
 B. Quality of PPAs

PPAs would

1. PPAs are responsive to the  Benefit any of the identified vulnerable groups
issues, problems, and gaps as  Rehabilitate, upgrade, retrofit existing physical
made evident in the ecological infrastructure/ critical facilities
profile and LDIS  Rehabilitate the environment
 Improve the delivery of basic services
 Directly target DRR and CCA issues corresponding
to the levels of risks and vulnerabilities
 B. Quality of PPAs

 All PPAs identified in Form 2a have corresponding

2. Every identified PPA has project briefs
corresponding project brief  For PPAs with direct DRR and CCA objectives and for
PPAs that are proposed to be funded out of the
LDRRMF, the project briefs must:
 Refer to the vulnerability and risk information in
the description/justification of the project
 Categorize the PPA as DRR, CCA or CCM type
 Have clear target vulnerable beneficiaries and
sectors
 Have quantifiable targets to determine if the
PPAs are contributing to risk reduction
 C. Quality of other implementation instruments (i.e. M&E, CapDev
Requirements, Legislation Requirements)

 the legislative measures addressing/supporting

prioritized PPAs are included in the Priority
1. The proposed legislative
Legislative Requirements form (Form 5b)
measures support prioritized
 To assess Form 5b is DRR-CCA mainstreamed, check
PPAs
if there are legislative measures that
address/support prioritized DRR-CCA PPAs
 C. Quality of other implementation instruments (i.e. M&E, CapDev
Requirements, Legislation Requirements)

 capdev programs addressing/supporting prioritized PPAs are

included in the CapDev Program Summary Form (Form 5a)
 To assess Form 5a is DRR-CCA mainstreamed, check if there
2. The proposed capacity development are CapDev Programs that address/support prioritized DRR-
programs support prioritized PPAs CCA PPAs
 Capdev on DRR and CCA can involve building technical
capacities related to risk assessments, conduct of GHG
inventory, structural resilience, disaster risk financing,
response and rescue, and recovery and rehabilitation, among
others.
 C. Quality of other implementation instruments (i.e. M&E, CapDev
Requirements, Legislation Requirements)

 monitoring and evaluation strategy assessing

prioritized PPAs are included in the CapDev Program
3. The proposed M&E Summary Form (Form 6b)
strategy reflects the  PPAs with DRR and CCA objectives must adopt the
development indicators of quantitative data from the CDRA or related
prioritized PPAs assessments to determine project impacts on
reducing the vulnerability or risks in the C/M.
 Monitoring of local critical infrastructures and critical
point facilities relies of construction supervision to
ensure that proper engineering designs and
standards are adopted during construction.
 A.Linkage and Consistency of the CDP and LDIP

 PPAs in Form 2a (Structured List of PPAs per Sector

– Long List) are linked and contributory to the
attainment of the C/M’s Vision, Goals, and
Objectives
1. The prioritization process of
PPAs considers the vision, goals  Prioritization tools utilized consider or give more
and objectives identified in the weight to identified PPAs contributing to the
CDP attainment of LGU’s vision, goals, and objectives

 If a GAM is undertaken, check whether PPAs

with DRR and CCA objectives were given high
priority. How many of the DRR and CCA projects
were prioritized?
 If only an Urgency Test was undertaken,
determine the number of projects ranked
Urgent on account of their DRR and CCA targets.
 A.Linkage and Consistency of the CDP and LDIP

2. The LDIP PPAs are a  Prioritized PPAs reflected in Form 3e (LDIP

subset of the structured list summary form) comes from Form 2a (Structured
of PPAs subsumed in the CDP List of PPAs per Sector – Long List)

 Determine the number of projects and/or the

volume of resources programmed for PPAs with
DRR or CCA objectives, relative to the total
programmed funds. All these PPAs should be
properly tagged.
 B. Consistency of the LDIP

 PPAs that are multi-sectoral or will achieve more

sectoral goals should have high scores/rates
1. PPAs that contribute to
during the prioritization process
more sectors or goals are rated
higher
 Check:

 If a CCC or related tool has been undertaken,

PPAs with DRR and CCA objectives were found to
be complementary with other PPAs.
 If PPAs with multi-sectoral objectives were
identified as priorities.
 B. Consistency of the LDIP

 Check if PPAs in the LDIP have high rates/score

2. All prioritized projects are those based on the result of prioritization exercise.
with the highest scores
 To assess if the LDIP is DRR-CCA mainstreamed,
check if
 Prioritized DRR-CCA PPAs are part of the LDIP
 The PPAs in the LDRRMIF (PPAs funded from
the 5% DRRMF) are included in the LDIP
 B. Consistency of the LDIP

3. The number of Project Briefs  All PPAs identified in Form 2a (Structured List of
on hand are equal to the number PPAs per Sector – Long List) should have
of Projects listed corresponding project briefs.

 All PPAs with DRR and CCA objectives and all

PPAs for LDRRMF must have project briefs.
 B. Consistency of the LDIP

4, The New Development Investment  projected local revenue, expenditure and

Financing Potential for the Medium- surplus for three (3) years served as basis in
Term (3-years) is estimated and determining the new investment financing
provided including the following potential. (Total Revenue – Projected
supporting documents: Mandatory Expenditures = New Development
Medium Term Local Revenue Investment Financing Potential)
Forecast (3-years);
Medium-Term Forward  timeframe of the Form 3c (Projection of New
Investment Financing Potential) is consistent
Estimates of Local
with the LDIP
Expenditures (3-years);
Medium-Term Estimate of  there is an increasing trend in the projected
Debt and Non-Debt revenues and consequently increasing
Contractual Obligations; and, LDRRMF and the overall fund for more PPAs.
Estimation of Fiscal Surplus or
Deficit
 B. Consistency of the LDIP

 Programmed amount in the 3-year LDIP is not

more than the total resources as indicated in the
medium-term (3 year) financing plan for the
same 3-year period
5. The Financing Plan (3-years) is
prepared and provided and is
 Projected revenues indicated in the medium-
consistent with the finalized
term (3 year) financial plan are consistent with
LDIP and LRMP for the same 3-
the projected revenues as indicated in the LRMP
year cycle.
for the same 3-year period

 there is an increasing trend in the projected

revenues and consequently increasing resources
for LDIP and LDRRMF and the overall fund for
more PPAs.
B. Consistency of the LDIP

 PPAs in the AIP are consistent with the PPAs in

the LDIP

 PPAs provided for Year t in the LDIP are also

6. The Annual Investment Program
programmed in the AIP for Year t. This represents
for Year t is equal to the Local
an ideal LDIP
Development Investment Program
for Year t (The AIP is the annual
slice of the LDIP.)  To assess if the AIP is DRR-CCA mainstreamed,
check if

 Prioritized DRR-CCA PPAs for Year t are part of

the AIP

 The PPAs in the LDRRMIF for Year t (PPAs funded

from the 5% DRRMF) are included in the AIP
 C. Alignment with CLUP, PDPFP and PDIP

 CDP and CLUP have the same vision statement.

 Sectoral strategies of the CDP are consistent with

the spatial development strategies of the CLUP
1. The developmental strategy and
programs of the city/municipality  PPAs identified in the CDP are not only sector-
are harmonized or consistent with focused but also considered spatial location
the CLUP.
 PPAs identified in the CLUP are considered in the
CDP PPA prioritization process

 Location of PPAs (especially infrastructure PPAs)

complements and is not in conflict with the land
use/zone regulations subsumed in the approved
ZO

 Check if PPAs, especially infrastructure projects

are not located within high-risk areas as
identified in CLUP.

 C. Alignment with CLUP, PDPFP and PDIP

 Check if C/M’s outward-looking perspective in their

vision contributes to the attainment of the
province’s vision, mission, and goals;
2. The vision, mission and goals
 Note: Indicate in the “remarks” column if the PDPFP
of the city/municipality are
is for updating or outdated during the assessment
aligned with the vision, mission
and goals of the Province as
 Check whether
provided in the PDPFP.
 the ecoprofile recognizes the role of the LGU in the
ecosystem
 role of the LGU in the ecosystem considered in it
outward-looking element of the vision.
 C. Alignment with CLUP, PDPFP and PDIP

 Check if PPAs in the CDP are complementary and

contribute to the attainment of the desired
results or outcomes of the PPAs identified in the
3. The city/municipality’s PPAs in
PDPFP.
the CDP are aligned with the
PPAs of Province’s PDPFP.  Note: Indicate in the “remarks” column if the
PDPFP is for updating or outdated during the
assessment.

 For details of PPAs, refer to respective project

brief
 C. Alignment with CLUP, PDPFP and PDIP

 Check if PPAs in the LDIP are supportive,

reinforces and are not in conflict with, or do not
4. The LDIP of the city/ duplicate any of the PPAs identified in the PDIP.
municipality is complementary
to the PDIP.  Note: Indicate in the “remarks” column if the
PDIP is for updating or outdated during the
assessment.

 For details of PPA, refer to project brief

Important Considerations

Results of CLUP and CDRA (or other similar tools) are integrated in the
C/MLGU information base (i.e., LDI, ecoprofile)
Results of CDRA or other similar tools are used to enhance the
C/MLGU situational analysis (i.e., VRG/PSFM)
Vision/goals/targets/ objectives/strategies from CDRA or related tool
coincide converge with the CDP and its implementation instruments
Local Development Investment Program (LDIP) /Annual Investment
Program (AIP) for PPAs with DRR/CCA objectives exceed the 5% LDRRM
Fund
Monitoring and evaluation includes a system for meaningfully
integrates resilience (e.g., construction supervision of critical
infrastructure)
 Mainstreaming

Guide Notes
Vision  Check if C/M’s descriptors and success indicators in the vision reflect
sectoral/thematic concerns
Ecological Profile  EP have relevant and updated information and statistics on the concerned
sectoral/thematic concern(s)
 If C/M utilized a particular analytical tool for a sectoral/thematic concern
[e.g. Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment (CDRA) for DRR-CCA], results
should be included in the ecological profile.

Situational Analysis  Check if sectoral/thematic issues and concerns are included in the
situational analysis (e.g. LDIS and PSFM)
 If C/M utilized a particular analytical tool for a sectoral/thematic concern
[e.g. CDRA, Participatory Rapid Appraisal (PRA)], results of it are included in
the situational analysis
 Mainstreaming

Guide Notes
Sectoral goals and  Check if issues and concerns of sectoral/thematic concerns are considered
strategies (Form 2a and in the development of sectoral goals and strategies
Form 2b)

Long list of PPAs (Form 2a)  Check if PPAs responsive to sectoral/thematic concerns and/or needs of
marginalized/vulnerable groups are included in the long list of PPAs (Form
2a)
LDIP (Form 3e)  Check if PPAs responsive to sectoral/thematic concerns and/or needs of
marginalized/vulnerable groups are included in the accomplished LDIP Form
(Form 3e)
Priority Legislative  Check if regulatory measures addressing/supporting sectoral/thematic
Requirements (Form 5b) concerns are included in the Priority Legislative Requirements form (Form
5b)
Mainstreaming
Mainstreaming