Scribd
Upload
44 views12 pages

GPON Topology

The document compares PSCA and PON network designs. It analyzes their differences in terms of cost, reliability, bandwidth increases, sustainability, fault impacts and more. It concludes that the current PSCA network design is better for most factors, but a PON network would be better for energy consumption and maintenance due to splitters.

Uploaded by

vokivar577
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
44 views12 pages

GPON Topology

The document compares PSCA and PON network designs. It analyzes their differences in terms of cost, reliability, bandwidth increases, sustainability, fault impacts and more. It concludes that the current PSCA network design is better for most factors, but a PON network would be better for energy consumption and maintenance due to splitters.

Uploaded by

vokivar577
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

Prepared by: Networks Team

Presented by: Awais Latif (DEO OFC/WAN)


Topic: PSCA Network vs PON Network
AON and PON Network

Analysis of both PSCA and PON network designs


PSCA Network Design vs GPON Network Design
PSCA Network
PON
GPON Architecture
GPON Splitting
Impact of converting the PSCA network to PON

Description PSCA PON Assessment Remarks


New PON Infrastructure need to deploy (we have already AON
Cost Low Too High Current Scenario is better Infrastructure)
Reliability of the end subscriber in Access Good (Ring
network Topology) Poor Current Scenario is better (end device is not twice in one PON)

Bandwidth increasing Simple Difficult Current Scenario is better


potentially
impacting a specific Impact on a broader Current Scenario is better
Impact of Fiber Cut link area
Business
environments, data Residential areas, Current Scenario is better
Sustainability centers broadband access
in the worst case scenario a single ONT can bring an entire PON tree
Impact of malfunction Low High Current Scenario is better with upto 64 subscriber down

Bandwidth Allocation Good Average Current Scenario is better

Imapact of fault in access node Low High Current Scenario is better

Maximum length of end device or user 100 KM 20 KM Current Scenario is better

Energy consumption High Low PON is is better PON save energy due to the splitter
PON network no need to power supply and ups for the network
Level of Maintenance High Low PON is is better splitters, in our rings power impact on all other sites

Note: For new project with PON Infrastructure situation shall be different
Selection of PON
GPON vs EPON

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy