0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views42 pages

Chapter 4

Uploaded by

wyatt378101
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views42 pages

Chapter 4

Uploaded by

wyatt378101
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 42

chapter 4

paradigms
why study paradigms

Concerns
– how can an interactive system be developed
to ensure its usability?
– how can the usability of an interactive
system be demonstrated or measured?

History of interactive system design


provides paradigms for usable designs
What are Paradigms

• Predominant theoretical frameworks or


scientific world views
– e.g., Aristotelian, Newtonian, Einsteinian (relativistic)
paradigms in physics
• Understanding HCI history is largely about
understanding a series of paradigm shifts
– Not all listed here are necessarily “paradigm” shifts,
but are at least candidates
– History will judge which are true shifts
Paradigms of interaction

New computing technologies arrive,


creating a new perception of the
human—computer relationship.
We can trace some of these shifts in
the history of interactive technologies.
The initial paradigm

• Batch processing

Impersonal computing
Example Paradigm Shifts

• Batch processing
• Time-sharing

Interactive computing
Example Paradigm Shifts

• Batch processing @#$% !


• Timesharing
• Networking

???

Community computing
Example Paradigm Shifts

• Batch processingC…P… filename Move this file here,


• Timesharing dot star… or was
it R…M?
and copy this to there.

• Networking
• Graphical displays % foo.bar
ABORT
dumby!!!

Direct manipulation
Example Paradigm Shifts

• Batch processing
• Timesharing
• Networking
• Graphical display
• Microprocessor

Personal computing
Example Paradigm Shifts

• Batch processing
• Timesharing
• Networking
• Graphical display
• Microprocessor
• WWW

Global information
Example Paradigm Shifts

• Batch processing • A symbiosis of physical


and electronic worlds in
• Timesharing service of everyday
activities.
• Networking
• Graphical display
• Microprocessor
• WWW
• Ubiquitous
Computing
Time-sharing

• 1940s and 1950s – explosive technological


growth

• 1960s – need to channel the power

• J.C.R. Licklider at ARPA

• single computer supporting multiple users


Video Display Units

• more suitable medium than paper

• 1962 – Sutherland's Sketchpad

• computers for visualizing and manipulating


data

• one person's contribution could drastically


change the history of computing
Programming toolkits

• Engelbart at Stanford Research Institute

• 1963 – augmenting man's intellect

• 1968 NLS/Augment system demonstration

• the right programming toolkit provides


building blocks to producing complex
interactive systems
Personal computing

• 1970s – Papert's LOGO language for simple


graphics programming by children

• A system is more powerful as it becomes


easier to user

• Future of computing in small, powerful


machines dedicated to the individual

• Kay at Xerox PARC – the Dynabook as the


ultimate personal computer
Window systems and the
WIMP interface
• humans can pursue more than one task at a
time

• windows used for dialogue partitioning, to


“change the topic”

• 1981 – Xerox Star first commercial windowing


system

• windows, icons, menus and pointers now


familiar interaction mechanisms
Metaphor

• relating computing to other real-world activity


is effective teaching technique
– LOGO's turtle dragging its tail
– file management on an office desktop
– word processing as typing
– financial analysis on spreadsheets
– virtual reality – user inside the metaphor

• Problems
– some tasks do not fit into a given metaphor
– cultural bias
Direct manipulation

• 1982 – Shneiderman describes appeal of


graphically-based interaction
– visibility of objects
– incremental action and rapid feedback
– reversibility encourages exploration
– syntactic correctness of all actions
– replace language with action

• 1984 – Apple Macintosh


• the model-world metaphor
• What You See Is What You Get (WYSIWYG)
Language versus Action

• actions do not always speak louder than


words!
• DM – interface replaces underlying
system
• language paradigm
• interface as mediator
• interface acts as intelligent agent
• programming by example is both action
and language
Hypertext

• 1945 – Vannevar Bush and the memex

• key to success in managing explosion of


information

• mid 1960s – Nelson describes hypertext as


non-linear browsing structure

• hypermedia and multimedia

• Nelson's Xanadu project still a dream today


Multimodality

• a mode is a human communication


channel

• emphasis on simultaneous use of


multiple channels for input and output
Computer Supported
Cooperative Work (CSCW)

• CSCW removes bias of single user /


single computer system

• Can no longer neglect the social aspects

• Electronic mail is most prominent


success
The World Wide Web

• Hypertext, as originally realized, was a


closed system
• Simple, universal protocols (e.g. HTTP)
and mark-up languages (e.g. HTML)
made publishing and accessing easy
• Critical mass of users lead to a
complete transformation of our
information economy.
Agent-based Interfaces

• Original interfaces
– Commands given to computer
– Language-based
• Direct Manipulation/WIMP
– Commands performed on “world” representation
– Action based
• Agents - return to language by instilling
proactivity and “intelligence” in command
processor
– Avatars, natural language processing
Ubiquitous Computing

“The most profound technologies are those that


disappear.”
Mark Weiser, 1991

Late 1980’s: computer was very apparent

How to make it disappear?


– Shrink and embed/distribute it in the physical world
– Design interactions that don’t demand our intention
Sensor-based and Context-
aware Interaction
• Humans are good at recognizing the
“context” of a situation and reacting
appropriately
• Automatically sensing physical
phenomena (e.g., light, temp, location,
identity) becoming easier
• How can we go from sensed physical
measures to interactions that behave as
if made “aware” of the surroundings?
Beginnings – Computing in 1945

• Harvard Mark I
– Picture from http://piano.dsi.uminho.pt/museuv/indexmark.htm

• 55 feet long, 8 feet high, 5 tons


Context - Computing in 1945

• Ballistics calculations
• Physical switches
(before microprocessor)
• Paper tape
• Simple arithmetic &
fixed calculations
(before programs)

Picture from http://www.gmcc.ab.ca/~supy/


• 3 seconds to multiply
Batch Processing

• Computer had one task,


performed sequentially
• No “interaction” between
operator and computer
after starting the run
• Punch cards, tapes for input
• Serial operations
People

• Who are the people associated with


various interactive paradigm shifts?
Other Resources

• Howard Rheingold – Tools for Thought


– History of interactive breakthroughs

– On-line at http://www.rheingold.com/texts/
tft/
Innovator: Vannevar Bush
• “As We May Think” - 1945 Atlantic Monthly
– “…publication has been extended far beyond our
present ability to make real use of the record.”
• Postulated Memex device
– Stores all records/articles/communications
– Items retrieved by indexing, keywords, cross
references (now called hyperlinks)
– (Envisioned as microfilm, not computer)
• Interactive and nonlinear components are key
• http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/flashbks/computer/
bushf.htm
More About Vannevar Bush

• Name rhymes with "Beaver"


• Faculty member MIT
• Coordinated WWII effort with
6000 US scientists
• Social contract for science
– federal government funds universities
– universities do basic research
– research helps economy & national defense
Innovator: J. R. Licklider

• 1960 - Postulated “man-computer


symbiosis”

• Couple human brains


and computing machines
tightly to revolutionize
information handling
Innovator: Ivan Sutherland

• SketchPad - 1963 PhD thesis at MIT


– Hierarchy - pictures & subpictures
– Master picture with instances (ie, OOP)
– Constraints
– Icons
– Copying
– Light pen input device
– Recursive operations
Innovator: Douglas Englebart

• Landmark system/demo:
– hierarchical hypertext, multimedia, mouse,
high-res display, windows, shared files,
electronic messaging, CSCW,
teleconferencing, ...

Inventor
of mouse
About Doug Engelbart
• Graduate of Berkeley (EE '55)
– "bi-stable gaseous plasma digital devices"
• Stanford Research Institute (SRI)
– Augmentation Research Center
• 1962 Paper "Conceptual Model for Augmenting
Human Intellect"
– Complexity of problems increasing
– Need better ways of solving problems

Picture of Engelbart from bootstrap.org


Innovator: Alan Kay

• Dynabook - Notebook sized computer loaded


with multimedia and can store everything
• @PARC
• Personal
computing
• Desktop
interface
• Overlapping
windows
Innovator: Ben Shneiderman

• Coins and explores notion of direct


manipulation of interface
• Long-time Director of
HCI Lab at Maryland
Innovator: Ted Nelson

• Computers can help people, not just


business

• Coined term
“hypertext”
Innovator: Nicholas Negroponte

• MIT Architecture Machine Group


– ’69-’80s - prior to Media Lab
• Ideas
– wall-sized displays, video
disks, AI in interfaces
(agents), speech recognition,
multimedia with hypertext
– Put That There (Video)
Innovator: Mark Weiser

• Introduced notion of Ubiquitous


Computing and Calm Technology
– It’s everywhere, but recedes quietly into
background
• CTO of Xerox PARC

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy