Unit 5
Unit 5
Unit 5 Motivation
Learning Unit outcomes Unit assessment criteria
Porter &
Maslow Lawler’s
We are not all motivated in the
same way, therefore…? expectancy
theory
Hertzberg Vroom’s
expectancy
theory
Job characteristic
McClelland
model
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Leeds to personality development &
increased motivation = full
potential, performance
Achievement recognition,
interesting, challenging,
meaningful job, progress or job
growth, responsibility, design
feedback. Enjoys & take pride
in their work.
Organisation’s
goals met
Motivation
Performance
Engagement
https://youtu.be/jxNhGE3gPcA
Job Characteristics Model (Hackman & Oldham)
• The task itself is key to employee motivation
• It provides a framework from which jobs can be redesigned to make the jobholders feel that they are doing
meaningful and valuable work.
By looking at specific job characteristics we compute the Motivating Potential Score (MPS) of that job:
MPS = Skill variety + Task identity + Task significance x Autonomy x Feedback
3
meaning
Enriching the elements of the job leads to altered psychological states in employees, which influence both their work
performance and satisfaction positively. How do you enrich someone’s job:
The 5 critical job dimensions are:
1. Skill variety – a variety of tasks which entail different skills and talents
2. Task identity-employee experience responsibility for a completely identifiable piece of work
3. Task significance – the extent the job impacts on other people ie. The customer
4. Autonomy- extent of freedom allowed to plan, schedule, take decisions and execute tasks
How can we
5. Feedback-receives information on how effective the job has been done
influence/
Critical Psychological factors: establish meaningful
jobs?
1. Experienced meaningfulness 2. Experience responsibility 3. Knowledge of results
Applying the Job-Characteristics model
Applying the Job-Characteristics Model
3 Steps used:
Step 1 Diagnose the work environment to determine whether a motivation problem
exists
• This is done through a self-report instrument which is completed by the employee
• The Motivating Potential Score (MPS) is then calculated
• The extent is determined to which the job characteristics foster internal work
motivation
• Low MPS scores = low motivating potential = job redesign is required
• If MPS is low you have to determine which aspects of the job are inadequate
• High MPS scores = employee is underperforming, the problem does not lie with the
job itself but with the contextual factors i.e. Equipment, inability of employee, stress,
conflict
Applying the Job-Characteristics Model
Step 2 Determining whether the job-redesign is appropriate for a given
group of employees
Step 3 Involves the redesign of the job starting with those job characteristics
which are lower than the national norm
• Include employees in the job redesign = greater commitment
• All jobs can be redesigned = training forms an integral part of the job enrichment
intervention and most employees can develop a growth need through effective goals
setting
Hackman & Oldham’s Job Characteristics Model
https://youtu.be/wpeGEOR3kNA
Vroom’s Expectancy Theory
• People are motivated to act in a specific way only if they believe that a desired outcome will be attained
• Behaviour and motivation is a function of: beliefs, expectancy, perceptions, values, and other mental
processes
People are motivated to do things to reach a goal if:
1. They believe in the worth of that goal Instrumentality
2. If there is a reasonable chance or probability that they will reach the organisation goal
• The attainment of the organisational goal will become and instrument through which he/she will attain
their own goals
• Motivation is present only if employees realise a positive correlation that effort leads to job-
performance and job performance leads to rewards
• If an employee wants a promotion and he/she believe that through meeting organisation goals that
he/she will get that promotion, he/she the person will put in a great effort. The opposite also applies.
Vroom’s Expectancy Theory
Vroom’s expectancy theory
Theoryhttps://youtu.be/WDgF7Avijlc
Porter & Lawler’s Expectancy Model
• The value of the reward is similar to Vroom’ valence theory. People desire a
combination of outcomes or rewards for what they put into their jobs
• The type of outcomes people desire differ i.e I desire achievement therefore
challenging tasks and recognition is important to me
• The perceived effort-reward probability is the extent to which a person believes
his/her efforts will in fact lead to a reward (same as Vroom’s expectancy theory)
• Both the desirability of the reward, and the probability that the effort will lead to
reward, will impact the effort the person will put into his or her job
Porter and Lawler’s Expectancy Model
Employee satisfaction is influenced by both intrinsic and extrinsic rewards
1. Intrinsic rewards – self granted, intangibles, i.e. A sense of accomplishment &
achievement.
• Influenced by the complexity of the tasks, how challenging it is, kind of feedback they
receive on their work. Influences an employee’s job-design positively.
• Intrinsic rewards have a powerful influence on performance and employee behaviour
2. Extrinsic rewards – bonuses, public recognition, awards and acceptance
• Equity in receiving rewards for their own inputs VS the rewards other employees receive
for their inputs are important. This influences an employee’s level of job-satisfaction
• Congruence between intrinsic rewards and extrinsic rewards are important i.e your feal
good about your job (intrinsic), however nobody else recognises your effort (extrinsic)
• Traditional view – the extent to which the employees see that the extrinsic rewards they
receive are a consequence of their performance (individual pay for performance)
• Modern view – gain sharing, profit sharing, stock ownership also linked to performance
Porter & Lawler’s Expectancy Model
McClelland
Porter &
Maslow Lawler’s
Vroom’s expectancy
expectancy theory
theory
Hertzberg
Job characteristic
model
Understanding Human
motivation
& behaviour
Discuss how generation Y employees can be motivated