0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views19 pages

Pole-Placement Pid Design

Uploaded by

ruanhattingh037
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views19 pages

Pole-Placement Pid Design

Uploaded by

ruanhattingh037
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 19

Controller design by means of

the pole-placement technique


September 2024
Introduction

• What do we want to achieve with a control


system?
• We want to be able to adjust the
• Transient, and
• Steady-state response of a system.
Step-response of a typical 2-nd order system
Step-response of a typical 2-nd order system

• (Rise time) - is the time required for the response to rise from 10% to 90%.

• (Peak time) - is the time required for the response to reach the first peak of
the overshoot.

• (Peak value) - is the maximum peak value of the response curve.

• (Peak time) - is the time required for the response to reach the first peak of
the overshoot.

• (Settling time) - is the time required for the response curve to reach and
stay within 2% of the final value.
Step-response of a typical 2-nd order system

• (Steady-state error) – The difference between the reference value and the
actual output value of the system
Model of a DC motor
Armature-controlled DC motor

𝜃˙ ( 𝑠) 𝐾𝑚
𝐺 ( s) = =
𝑉 𝑎 ( 𝑠) ( 𝐿𝑎 𝑠+ 𝑅𝑎 ) ( 𝐽𝑠+ 𝑏 ) + 𝐾 𝑏 𝐾 𝑚

𝜃˙ (𝑠) 𝐾𝑚
𝐺𝑟𝑒𝑑 ( s )= ≈
𝑉 𝑎 ( 𝑠) ( 𝐽𝑠 +𝑏 )+ 𝐾 𝑏 𝐾 𝑚
Specification

• 2% settling time less than 1 second


• Peak time less than 0.50 seconds
• Maximum overshoot less than 20%
Simulation example

• Let the plant transfer function be given by

• Let and
Uncompensated system (open-loop)

1
Step input
0.9 System
output
0.8

0.7

0.6
Output

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Time [s]
Uncompensated system (closed-loop)

1
System input
0.9 System output

0.8

0.7

0.6
Output

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Time [s]
Compensator design

• Choose settling time of 0.7s which is less than 1 s


according to spec.
• Choose P.O. = 15% which is less than 20 %
according to spec.
Pole-placement

+ E (s)
R( s ) Ki 1
 Kp  Y (s)
- s Js  b
PI control DC motor
plant

+ E (s)
R( s ) K p s  Ki 1
 Y (s)
- s Js  b
PI control DC motor
plant
Derive closed-loop characteristic equation

+ E (s)
R( s ) K p s  Ki 1
 Y (s)
- s Js  b
PI control DC motor
plant

Kp Ki
s
T (s)  J J
2  b  Kp  Ki
s  s
 J  J

n 2
T ( s)  2
s  2n s  n 2
Match the 2nd order denominators

 b  Kp  Ki
s  2
 s   s 2
 2 n s   n
2

 J  J

 b  Kp  Ki
  2n s n 2
 J  J
Subsitute the system and control design parameters, then determine
and
PI-controller setup
Compensated system response

System input
System output
1.2

0.8
Output

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Time [s]

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy