MF - Chap 5
MF - Chap 5
Chapter 5
Managerial Planning and Goal Setting
OVERVIEW OF GOALS AND PLANS
External
Vission Message
Mission
Strategic Goals /
Plans
Senior Management
Organization as a
TacticalWhole
Goals/ Plans Internal
Message
Middle Level
Management
Major Divisions/
Operational Level Goals/
Functions
Plans
Lower Management
LEVELS OF PLANNING (CONT.)
• The planning process starts with a formal mission that defines the basic
purpose of the organization especially for external audiences. The mission is
the basis for the strategic (company) level of goals and plans set by the top
management, which in turn shapes the tactical (divisional) level and the
operational.
• Tactical goals and plans are the responsibility of middle managers, such as the
heads of major divisions or functional units. Tactical plans focus on the major
actions the division must take to fulfill its part in the strategic plan.
• Operational plans identify the specific procedures or processes needed at
lower levels of the organization such as individual departments and
employees. Front-line managers and supervisors develop operational plans
focus on specific tasks and processes and that help meet tactical and strategic
goals.
• Planning at each level supports the other levels.
PURPOSES OF GOALS AND PLANS
• Legitimacy - Mission describes what the organization stands for and its reason for existence
to external audiences such as investors, customers, suppliers, and the local community.
• Source of motivation and commitment – Motivation happens through reducing
uncertainty, clarifying what they should accomplish and letting know what actions to
undertake to achieve the goal.
• Resource allocation - Goals help managers to decide where they need to allocate
resources, such as employees, money, and equipment.
• Guides to action - They provide a sense of direction. They focus attention on specific
targets and direct employee efforts toward important outcomes.
• Rationale for decisions - Through goal setting managers clarify what the organization is
trying to accomplish. They can make decisions to ensure that internal policies, roles,
performance, structure, products, and expenditures will be made in accordance with desired
outcomes.
• Standard of performance - Because goals define desired outcomes for the organization,
they also serve as performance criteria. They provide a standard of assessment.
T H E O R G A N I Z AT I O N A L P L A N N I N G P R O C E SS
• Operational Goals - The results expected from departments, work groups, and
individuals. They are precise and measurable.
• Operational Plans - are developed at the lower levels of the organization to
specify action steps toward achieving operational goals and to support tactical
plans. tool for daily and weekly operations.
Goals are stated in quantitative terms and the department plan describes how
goals will be achieved. Operational planning specifies plans for department
managers, supervisors, and individual employees.
This is a system whereby managers and employees define goals for every
department, project, and person and use them to monitor subsequent
performance.
MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES (CONT.)
1) Setting goals involves employees at all levels look “What are we trying to accomplish?”
Managers need the criteria of effective goals assigned responsibility for goal
accomplishment. However, goals should be jointly derived. Mutual agreement between
employee and supervisor creates the strongest commitment to achieving goals.
2) Develop action plans. An action plan defines the course of action needed to achieve the
stated goals. Action plans are made for both individuals and departments.
3) Review progress is important to ensure that action plans are working. These reviews can
occur informally between managers and subordinates, where the organization may wish
to conduct three-, six-, or nine-month reviews during the year. This periodic checkup
allows managers and employees to see whether they are on target or whether corrective
action is needed.
4) Appraise overall performance. The final step in MBO is to carefully evaluate whether
annual goals have been achieved for both individuals and departments.
M A N A G E M E N T BY O B J E C T I V E S ( C O N T. )
SINGLE-USE AND STANDING PLANS
• Single-use plans are developed to achieve a set of goals that are not likely to be repeated in the
future.
• Standing plans are ongoing plans that provide guidance for tasks or situations that occur repeatedly
within the organization.
PLANNING FOR TURBULENT ENVIRONMENT
Contingency Planning
Building Scenarios
Crisis Planning
CONTINGENCY PLANS
• Some firms engage in crisis planning after the September 11 terrorist attack in
USA , in order to response towards continuously growing emphasis is on
managing uncertainty.
• Sudden unexpected events have the potential to destroy the organization if
managers ARE NOT prepared with a quick and appropriate response.
Crisis Prevention
Build Relationships
Detect Signals from Environment
Crisis Preparation
Designate crisis management team and
spokesperson.
Create detailed crisis management plan.
Set up effective communications system.
TRADITIONAL APPROACH TO PLANNING
• Traditionally corporate planning and strategy and planning have been the domain of top
managers and been done by consulting firms or by central planning departments.
Centralized
Planning
• This approach was top down because goals and plans were assigned to major divisions and
departments from the planning department after approval by the president.
• This worked well in many applications and is still popular with some companies.
• Central planning departments may be out of touch with the constantly changing realities
faced by front-line managers and employees, which may leave people struggling to follow a
plan that no longer fits the environment and customer needs.
• In addition, formal plans dictated by top managers and central planning departments can
inhibit employee innovation and learning.
HIGH-PERFORMANCE APPROACHES TO PLANNING
A fresh approach to planning is to involve everyone in the organization, and sometimes outside
stakeholders as well.
Decentralization