On Effect of Non Registration Under Section
On Effect of Non Registration Under Section
1. Legal Certainty: Registration helps create clear legal titles, reducing the chances of
disputes over ownership.
2. Prevention of Fraud: By registering documents, the law ensures that no party can
claim ownership fraudulently or transfer property multiple times to different buyers.
3. Public Record: Registered documents become part of the public domain, allowing
for transparency in property dealings.
4. Protection of Rights: Registration offers protection to the parties involved in a
transaction, ensuring that their rights are legally recognized.
Section 49: Non-Registration
No Power to Adopt
This applies in personal law matters where adoption deeds are involved. If an
adoption deed is not registered, it does not confer legal status or rights of
adoption, meaning the adoption may be challenged.
Inadmissibility in Court The Most Critical Consequence:
Non-registration renders the document inadmissible as evidence in court to
prove the main transaction. This means that the parties to the transaction cannot
use the unregistered document to assert any rights related to the property.
Example: If "A" sells land to "B" and the sale deed is not registered, "B" cannot
produce the unregistered deed in court to claim ownership. The court will
refuse to accept the document as evidence of the sale.
Collateral Purpose Exception
One important caveat to the strict rule of inadmissibility is the collateral purpose
exception. While the unregistered document cannot be used to prove the primary
transaction (such as the transfer of ownership), it can still be used for collateral
purposes.
What is a Collateral Purpose?
A collateral purpose refers to a secondary or incidental matter, not the main issue
in the case. This means that the unregistered document can be used to prove
something related to, but not central to, the property transaction. Examples: An
unregistered sale deed might be used to prove that a payment was made. An
unregistered lease deed could be used to show that the tenant had been paying
rent regularly, but not to prove the existence of the lease itself.
Case Law: K.B. Saha & Sons Private Limited vs Development Consultant
Limited (2008) In this case, the Supreme Court allowed the use of an
Optional Registration
Section 18 of the Registration Act, 1908 outlines the types of documents whose registration is
optional rather than mandatory. This section allows people to register certain documents if
they choose, though it's not required by law.
The specific types of documents that can be optionally registered under Section 18 include:
1. Instruments acknowledging the receipt or payment of any consideration money
related to documents registered under this Act.
2. Leases of immovable property for a term not exceeding one year.
3. Instruments (other than wills) that purport or operate to create, declare, assign, limit,
or extinguish any right, title, or interest in immovable property, with a value that does
not exceed one hundred rupees.
4. Wills and other testamentary documents.
5. Other documents not required to be registered under Section 17, provided they do not
contravene other requirements of the Act or any other law.
Ram Rattan vs. Parmananand
Facts: In this case, a dispute arose regarding the ownership of certain land in Uttar
Pradesh. The plaintiff claimed ownership based on an unregistered sale deed
executed by the defendant. The defendant contended that since the deed was
unregistered, it was invalid, and he remained the owner of the property.
Legal Issue: The core issue was whether the unregistered sale deed could be enforced
to establish ownership of the property.
Judgment: The court ruled in favor of the defendant, stating that the unregistered sale
deed could not be used to transfer title or ownership of the immovable property as
required under Section 49 of the Registration Act. The judgment reaffirmed the legal
principle that non-registration of a document meant it had no effect on the immovable
property and could not be relied upon as evidence in court.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Section 49 of the Registration Act plays a crucial role in ensuring legal
certainty and transparency in property transactions. The consequences of
nonregistration are severe, rendering unregistered documents legally ineffective for
transferring rights in immovable property. While the collateral purpose exception
provides limited relief, it does not diminish the importance of registering documents
to protect the legal rights of parties involved in property transactions.