ADAPTATIONS TO ANAEROBIC TRAINING

Adaptations to Anaerobic
Training
In muscular activities that require near-maximal force
production for relatively short periods of time, such as
sprinting, much of the energy needs are met by the ATP
phosphocreatine (PCr) system and the anaerobic breakdown
of muscle glycogen (glycolysis).
ANAEROBIC POWER AND CAPACITY TESTING:

 Anaerobic power is the ability to generate quick bursts of energy, and anaerobic
capacity is the ability to sustain high-intensity efforts.
 Unlike aerobic power, there is no universally agreed-upon test for measuring
anaerobic power. Various tests are used, but no gold standard exists.
 Three common tests are the Wingate anaerobic test, critical power test, and
maximal accumulated oxygen deficit test.
 The Wingate test is widely used, with peak power output in the first 5 to 10
seconds considered an indicator of anaerobic power.
 Mean power output (average power over 30 seconds) and total work (mean power
output multiplied by 30 seconds) are used as measures of anaerobic capacity.
 Anaerobic training, like sprint training, leads to improvements in both
anaerobic power and capacity.
 Results vary across studies, with some showing minimal increases and
others demonstrating up to a 25% improvement.
 Training on the track or using a cycle ergometer are common methods for
improving anaerobic capabilities.
ADAPTATIONS IN MUSCLE WITH ANAEROBIC TRAINING

 Muscle Fiber Changes:

 Anaerobic training (sprint and resistance) targets muscle fibers, especially
type II fibers.
 Sprint and resistance activities heavily engage type IIa and type IIb muscle
fibers, leading to increased cross-sectional areas.
 Shift in Fiber Composition with Sprint Training: Sprint training can
decrease the percentage of type I fibers and increase type II fibers.
 In a study, 15-30 s sprints led to a shift from 57% to 48% in type I fibers
and an increase from 32% to 38% in type IIa fibers.
 Glycolytic System Adaptations:
 Anaerobic training (30 s bouts) increases key glycolytic enzymes'
activities.
 Despite enzyme changes, a 60 s sprint test shows similar power output
and fatigue rates after training with either short (6 s) or longer (30 s)
bouts.
 Performance gains seem more tied to strength improvements than
enhanced anaerobic ATP production.
ADAPTATIONS TO HIGH-INTENSITY INTERVAL TRAINING

 High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT):

 HIIT involves short bursts of intense cycling followed by rest or low-
intensity cycling for recovery.
 It's a time-efficient way to get aerobic benefits, similar to traditional
continuous exercises like running or cycling.
 HIIT induces similar positive changes in the heart, blood vessels, and
muscles as traditional continuous training.
 A study compared HIIT with traditional cycling training, showing
comparable improvements in exercise performance despite significantly
less time commitment for HIIT.
 Molecular pathways stimulated by HIIT include mitochondrial growth,
changes in carbohydrate and fat usage, similar to endurance training
 Untrained individuals doing HIIT (30s sprints with 4-min recovery, 3
times/week) showed similar benefits as those doing an hour of continuous
cycling 5 days a week.
 Cycling time trials improved equally in both groups, even though the HIIT
group's total exercise volume was much lower.
 athletes who already train vigorously can also benefit from adding HIIT,
but the adaptations differ.
SPECIFICITY OF TRAINING AND CROSS-TRAINING

 Specificity of Training:
 Physiological adaptations from training are specific to the type of activity.
 The more closely training mimics a particular sport or activity, the greater
the performance improvement.
 Athletes should be tested in activities similar to their usual sport to
accurately measure improvements.
 Cross-Training:
 Cross-training involves training for multiple sports simultaneously or
working on various fitness components together.
 Combining cardiorespiratory endurance and strength training can result in
gains, but muscular gains may be less when combined.
 Adding resistance training to endurance training doesn't seem to hinder
aerobic power improvement.
 Earlier studies suggested limitations, but recent research shows similar
gains in strength, muscle size, and neural activation with concurrent high-
intensity strength and cycle endurance training.
TRAINING FOR SPORT

• OPTIMIZING TRAINING
• PERIODIZATION OF TRAINING
• OVERTRAINING
• TAPERING FOR PEAK PERFORMANCE
• DETRAINING
OPTIMIZING TRAINING

 The principle of progressive overload is a fundamental aspect of

well-designed training programs.
 It emphasizes the need to progressively increase the training
stimulus as the body adapts to the current level.
 However, finding the optimal balance is crucial, as pushing the body
too far can lead to overtraining, resulting in performance
decrements.
MODEL OF THE CONTINUUM OF TRAINING STAGES.
 Overreaching is a deliberate attempt to overstress the body for a
short duration, leading to a brief performance decrement followed by
improved physiological function and performance.
 The challenge is to avoid transitioning into overtraining, where
chronic maladaptations occur.
 Recovery from overreaching takes several days to weeks, whereas
overtraining may require months or even years.
 The interaction between training intensity and volume is significant.
 High-intensity, low-volume training increases muscular strength and anaerobic
capacity but has limited impact on aerobic capacity.
 Low-intensity, high-volume training, on the other hand, improves aerobic capacity
but has little effect on strength or anaerobic capacity.
 Balancing these factors is essential for optimizing training outcomes.
 In conclusion, optimizing training involves finding the right balance between intensity and volume,
avoiding excessive training, and recognizing the individualized nature of optimal training stimuli for
each athlete.
PERIODIZATION OF TRAINING
 Introduction:
 Effective training is a critical aspect of athletic performance, and
periodization has emerged as a key model for structuring training
programs.
 Here we explain concept of periodization, with a focus on traditional
and block approaches, discussing their evolution, advantages, and
potential drawbacks.
 Traditional Periodization:
 Historical Perspective: Traditional periodization originated in the 1960s and
gained widespread acceptance over the subsequent decades. It involves dividing
the entire sport training season into smaller periods, incorporating multiyear
preparation, macrocycles, mesocycles, microcycles, and individual workouts.
 Hierarchical Structure: The hierarchical structure of traditional periodization is
designed to achieve desired performance outcomes by varying training loads over
time. This approach allows for acute overload and overreaching without pushing
athletes into overtraining.
 Limitations: Traditional periodization faces challenges in adapting to the modern
trend of athletes participating in multiple competitions throughout the year.
 Block Periodization:
 Emergence and Principles: In response to the limitations of traditional
periodization, the concept of training blocks gained popularity in the 1980s. Block
periodization involves highly specialized and concentrated training cycles. The
number of blocks is limited (usually three or four), and each block typically lasts 2 to
4 weeks.
 Advantages: Block periodization addresses the shortcomings of traditional models
by providing a more focused and adaptable approach. The concentration on specific
abilities in each block allows for optimal adaptation without excessive fatigue.
COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL
PERIODIZATION AND BLOCK
 Flexibility and Complexity: PERIODIZATION:
Traditional periodization is effective for
preparing athletes for a single planned competition but struggles with the
complexity of multiple competitions. Block periodization offers greater
flexibility and adaptability, especially for athletes engaging in frequent
competitions.
 Skill-Specific Adaptation: While traditional periodization works well for
sports like running, swimming, and cycling, block periodization's focus on
specific abilities makes it potentially more suitable for sports requiring
diverse skill sets.
 Research Gaps: Despite the potential benefits of block periodization,
limited research has been conducted to validate its physiological
adaptations and performance improvements across different sports. This
creates a gap in understanding its overall efficacy.
OVERTRAINING

 Overtraining, characterized by an unexplained decline in athletic

performance and physiological function, poses a significant
challenge to athletes and coaches.
 Here we explores the idea of overtraining, addressing its causes,
symptoms, and potential strategies for prevention and recovery.
Causes and Symptoms of Overtraining:
 Overtraining is a consequence of intense training influenced by both psychological and
physiological factors.
 Emotional stress, coupled with unrealistic goals, can contribute to overtraining.

 The overtraining syndrome involves a decline in performance and symptoms like muscular
weakness, fatigue, changes in appetite, weight loss, and sleep disturbances.
 Autonomic nervous system responses, hormonal changes, and compromised immunity are
associated with overtraining.
 Overtraining also suppresses immune function, making athletes more susceptible to
infections.
Strategies for Prevention and Recovery:
 Periodization Training:
 Alternating between easy, moderate, and hard training.
 Rest and varied intensity to prevent overtraining.

 Caloric and Carbohydrate Intake:

 Endurance athletes should monitor intake.
 Replenishing muscle glycogen prevents energy depletion.

 Monitoring Heart Rate:

 Use digital heart rate monitors during workouts.
 Elevated heart rates indicate potential overtraining.

 Recovery Strategies:
 Marked reduction or complete rest needed.
 Recovery duration varies, from days to months.

TAPERING STRATEGIES FOR PEAK ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE

Introduction:
 Achieving peak athletic performance involves a delicate balance between intense
training and strategic rest.
 Tapering, the practice of reducing training intensity and volume before a major
competition, plays a crucial role in enhancing an athlete's physical and
psychological readiness.
 Here we learn about the concept of tapering, its physiological effects, optimal
duration, and its impact on various sports.
 Tapering is a well-established strategy utilized by athletes across disciplines to
maximize strength, power, and overall performance capacity.
Physiological Effects of Tapering:
 Muscular Strength Increase: A notable change during the taper period is a
significant increase in muscular strength. Studies indicate that this enhancement
in strength is a key contributor to the overall improvement in performance. The
exact mechanisms behind these strength improvements involve potential
changes in muscle fibers' contractile mechanisms and improved muscle fiber
recruitment.
 Tissue Healing and Energy Reserves: Tapering allows adequate time for the
healing of tissue damage incurred during intense training. Additionally, it
facilitates the restoration of energy reserves, including muscle and liver glycogen.
Optimal Duration of Tapering:
 Sport-Specific Variation: Tapering periods can range from 4 to 28 days or
longer, depending on the nature of the sport, the specific event, and the
individual athlete's needs. The optimal duration varies among sports, and
coaches must tailor tapering strategies to align with the demands of the
competition and the athlete's requirements.
Impact on Performance Across Sports:
 Endurance Sports (Swimming and Running): Studies in swimmers and
runners who reduced training by approximately 60% for 15 to 21 days
demonstrated no losses in VO2max or endurance performance. In fact, swimmers
showed a 3% improvement in performance and an 18% to 25% increase in arm
strength and power.
 Distance Running: Distance runners who underwent a 7-day taper experienced
a 3% improvement in a 5 km time trial, highlighting the positive impact of
tapering on running performance. Submaximal oxygen uptake and blood lactate
concentrations also reflected greater efficiency during running.
DETRAINING

 Introduction:
 Detraining is a phenomenon characterized by the partial or complete loss of training-
induced adaptations when athletes either cease training or significantly reduce their
training load.
 In contrast to tapering, which involves a gradual reduction in training intensity over a short
period, detraining can have notable consequences for highly conditioned athletes.
 Understanding the implications of detraining is crucial for athletes seeking to maintain
peak performance throughout their competitive seasons.
Muscular Strength and Power:
 Muscle Atrophy and Strength Loss: Detraining leads to significant changes in
both bone and muscle, resulting in muscle atrophy, a process marked by a
decrease in muscle size. Studies show that even a few days of inactivity can
initiate this process. Highly trained individuals, such as weightlifters, may
experience rapid declines in strength within a few weeks of detraining.
 Glycolytic Enzymes and Strength Maintenance: Detraining affects glycolytic
enzymes less than oxidative enzymes, potentially explaining why sprint
performance remains relatively unaffected during short periods of inactivity.
However, the ability to perform longer endurance events may decrease
significantly with as little as 2 weeks of detraining.
Muscular Endurance:
 Oxidative Enzymes and Endurance Capacity: Inactivity is associated with a
decrease in oxidative enzymes like succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), impacting
muscle endurance. Muscular endurance decreases after just 2 weeks of inactivity,
with evidence suggesting a decline in metabolic potential.
 Glycogen Content and Endurance Loss: Detraining results in a notable
reduction in muscle glycogen content, an essential factor in endurance-trained
muscles. Swimmers, for instance, may experience a decline in swimming power
even if muscular strength remains unchanged during reduced activity.
Speed, Agility, and Flexibility:
 Small Impact on Speed and Agility: Speed and agility experience
relatively small losses during detraining. However, maintaining peak
speed and agility requires consistent training, emphasizing the
importance of regular practice for optimal performance.
 Rapid Flexibility Decline: Flexibility, crucial for injury prevention,
decreases rapidly during inactivity. Incorporating stretching exercises
into training programs, both in-season and off-season, is essential to
maintain flexibility.
THANK YOU