HIV Final Presentation
HIV Final Presentation
PARITOSH VASANI
DR. RAJ PATEL
DR. HARSH VAGADIA
• Zidovudine (AZT)
• Didanosine(ddl)
• Stavudine(d4t)
• Lamivudine(3tc)
• Abacavir(ABC)
• Tenofovir(tdf)
• Emtricitabine(FTC)
Lamivudine
• Dose: 300mg Odor 150mg bd
• Primarily eliminated by kidney, and dose adjustment is needed to prevent
accumulated
• Can be used for hepatitis-B infection, but in reduced dosage.
• Point mutation in HIV reverse transcriptase and HBV DNA polymerase give rise
to rapid lamivudine resistance.
• Adverse effect : headache(35%), fatigue(~27%), malaise(~27%), peripheral
neuropathy, dizziness, increase hepatic enzymes
• Contraindicated in person hypersensitive to Lamivudine,
Tenofovir
• Dose : 300mg od
• Tenofovir alafenamide, Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
• Renal dose adjustment is recommended (for TDF)
• Discontinue use in patients who develop clinically significant decrease in renal
function or develop fanconi syndrome.
• Adverse effect : abdominal pain, diarrhoea, rash, increase creatinine,
arthralgia, bone demineralization.
Tenofovir toxicity
• Overall good safety profile, fewer metabolic side effects and mitochondrial
toxicities.
• Major S/E are :
1. Renal toxicity (most significant) : overall 3-5%
2. Decrease in Bone Mineral density.
However TAF is associated with less renal and bone toxicity compared with
TDF since it achieves lower plasma tenofovir concentrations.
NNRTIs (non-nucleoside reverse
transcriptase inhibitors)
• MOA: Directly inhibit HIV reverse transcriptase without the need for intracellular
phosphorylation. Their site of action is different from NRTIs. They are non-
competitive inhibitors.
• Metabolised by CYP3A4 and CYP2B6.
• Are enzymes inducers.
• Nevirapine
• Efavirenz
• Delavirdine
• Rilpivirine
• Etravirine
• Doravirine
EFAVIRENZ(EFV)
• Dolutegravir can cause serious life threatening side effects,which include Hypersensitivity
(Allergic reactions) and Hepatitits.
• Dolutegravir can have significant interactions with agents, such as metformin, rifampin, and
• DTG and weight Gain – concern of weight gain has been noted with use of DTG.
However, it is worth noting that the weight gain was mostly seen when TAF was
used along with DTG.
Benefits of DTG :-
• Highly potent and has High genetic barrier.
• Causes Rapid Viral Suppression;Helps in achieving rapid viral suppression.
• Found to reduce viral copies to <50 copies/ml within 4 weeks.
• Effective in PLHIV infected with HIV-2 or combined HIV-1 and HIV-2.
• No need for substitution of DTG-based ART regimen in PLHIV if co-infected with
TB or HBV or HCV.
Raltegravir
is approved for use in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients with HIV Raltegravir •
It had been primarily used for Second or Third line ART in national ART program.
• Raltegravir is generally administered as 400 mg twice daily (800 mg total daily dose). However, once daily
dosing with two 600 mg tablets (1200 mg total daily dose) is an option for patients who are treatment naïve or
who are virologically suppressed (eg, HIV RNA <50 copies/mL) on an initial regimen of raltegravir 400 mg
twice daily.
Although rare, side effects can be seen with raltegravir, and include nausea, dizziness, and headache. Rare cases of
skeletal muscle toxicity and severe systemic cutaneous reaction resembling Stevens-Johnson syndrome have
also been reported
One of the main disadvantages of raltegravir is its lower genetic barrier to resistance compared with dolutegravir
and protease inhibitors
Protease inhibitor
• Protease inhibitors (PIs) are typically administered in combination with a dual nucleoside combination; however,
they can also be used as part of a nucleoside-sparing/limiting regimen. PIs should be administered with a
boosting agent, either ritonavir or cobicistat. They can be used for patients who are treatment-naïve, and are often
the preferred agent for patients failing their initial antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen.
• Mechanism of action – Protease inhibitors (PIs) competitively inhibit the cleavage of the Gag-Pol polyproteins
in HIV-infected cells, which is a crucial step in the viral maturation process, thereby resulting in the production
of immature virions that are not infectious
• Resistance – PIs have a relatively high genetic barrier to resistance compared with non-nucleoside reverse
transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and the integrase inhibitors (INSTIs) raltegravir and elvitegravir.
• Adverse events – There are several side effects that appear to be PI class effects while others are agent-specific.
Some of the class side effects are insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, lipodystrophy,
hepatotoxicity, bleeding in patients with hemophilia, and PR interval prolongation
Ritonavir
• Atazanavir has the advantage of better gastrointestinal tolerance than most other PIs,
once-daily dosing, and good potency.
The principal adverse effects associated with darunavir include nausea, diarrhea, increased
transaminases, headache, and rash. However, severe reactions can occur, and darunavir
should be discontinued in patients who develop a rash associated with fever, transaminase
elevations, eosinophilia, and/or systemic symptoms, as well as those who have severe skin
reactions (eg, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, exanthematous
pustulosis)
Entry Inhibitors
• Attachment Inhibitor :
1. CCR-5 blocker : Maraviroc
2. GP-120 blocker : Fostemsavir
3. CD4 blocker : Ibalizumab
ENFUVIRTIDE
• Interferes with the fusion of the viral and cellular membranes by
binding to the HR1 region in the gp41 subunit of the HIV-1 envelope.
• Not active againt hiv-2.
• Among the drawbacks
1) Twice a day injection
2) Injection site reactions in close to 100% of patients,
3) An increase in bacterial pneumonia
Maraviroc
• A CCR5 Antagonist
Interferes with HIV binding at the stage of co-receptor engagement.
• A co-receptor tropism assay
Should be performed if one is considering the usee of maraviroc
• ADR
An allergic reaction associated hepatotoxicity has been
Among the most common side effects of maraviroc are,
1) Dizziness due to postural hypotension
2) cough, fever , colds, rash, muscle and joint pain
Diagnosis of HIV
Objectives of HIV Testing
• Blood and blood products safety. This is achieved by mandatory testing of all donated blood units and blood products.
• Epidemiological surveillance.
• Research.
Choice of the Screening Assay
Before choosing a particular kit/strategy for HIV testing one has to be clear about the objectives
of testing. The following parameters should be considered before testing:
• Sensitivity of the test kit
• Specificity of the test kit
• Prevalence of HIV infection in the population
• Cost effectiveness
• Appropriateness of testing to national guideline strategies and to the infrastructure facilities
available.
Western Blot:
In the western blot, the various HIV specific recombinant or synthetic
antigens are adsorbed onto nitrocellulose paper. This is similar to what is
done in an ELISA test, except that the product is insoluble.
HIV TESTING
STRATEGIES
Strategy 1 (for blood transfusion/transplant safety)
The specimen is subjected to one test for HIV reactivity. The test used in
strategy 1 must have high sensitivity. If non reactive, the specimen is to be
considered free of HIV (negative) and if reactive, the specimen is
considered as HIV popsitive. This strategy is used for ensuring donation
safety (e.g., blood, blood products, organs, tissues, sperms etc.). The unit
of blood that tests reactive (positive) is discarded. If the donor is to be
notified of his result, based on his prior consent, it becomes a matter of
diagnosis (in which case strategies II & III must be used after proper
counselling) and the donor should be referred to an ICTC for the
confirmation of the
Strategy 2A for surveillance :
A specimen is considered negative for HIV if the first ELISA
or rapid test reports it so. In case it is reactive, it is subjected
to a second ELISA or rapid test, which utilizes a system
different from the first one (i.e., the principle of the test
and/or the antigen used is different). It is reported positive
only if the second ELISA/rapid test also gives a reactive
report like the first test. In case the second E/R is non
reactive, the result is taken as negative for sentinel
surveillance purposes. This type of HIV testing is
anonymous and unlinked.
Strategy 2 B (used for diagnosis in symptomatic
patients)
This strategy is used to determine the HIV status of a
clinically symptomatic suspected AIDS cases in which
blood/serum/plasma is tested with a highly sensitive
screening test.
Strategy 3 (used for diagnosis in asymptomatic
patients)
In strategy 3 the HIV testing done is similar to strategy 2,
with the added testing of a third test for a positive result.
Positive confirmation of a third reactive E/R test is
required for a specimen to be reported HIV positive. If the
specimen gives a reactive result with two E/R and non-
reactive result with the third assay, it is reported as
“indeterminate” and the patient is called again for repeat
testing after 2-4 weeks.
Qualitative Polymerase Chain Reaction for HIV DNA
In infants, the sensitivity of a traditional PCR test – for the diagnosis of HIV infection and the qualitative
detection of HIV DNA – is as high as 90 to 100 percent by the age of 4- 6 weeks. An example of a commercially
available test, approved by the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI), is the qualitative AMPLICOR HIV-1
DNA PCR Test, ver. 1.5 (Roche), which can be used to test dried blood spots or whole blood collected in EDTA.
This test has a reported 99.3 percent sensitivity and 96 percent specificity.
Antigen Detection
The HIV-1 p24 antigen is present as either an immune complex, with anti-p24 antibodies, or as a
free p24 antigen in the blood of infected individuals. The positive p24 test confirms diagnosis of
HIV infection; however, a negative test does not rule out HIV infection. The test is based on
the ELISA. The sensitivity of the test increases with the use of techniques to dissociate the p24
antigen from its antibody, as in immune complex-dissociated (ICD) tests
HIV p24 antigen assays, with increased sensitivity, are now commercially available and under
evaluation, e.g., the ultrasensitive p24 assay (Perkin- Elmer).
MANAGEMENT OF HIV
• FIRST LINE ART in PLHIV for treatment-naïve adult and adolescent patients
with age >10 yrs and weight >30kg is as follows :-
• A single pill of TLD preferably taken at bedtime, and situations where additional
dosing of DTG is indicated should be taken preferably in the morning.
Plasma Viral Load
• Signifies rate of CD4 + T cell destruction and magnitude of HIV replication.
• Within first few weeks of ART initiation, It starts decreasing.
• After first 6 months, a plasma viral load test should be done to evaluate
response to ARVs.
• Repeated again at 12 months and once viral load is suppressed, every 12
months.
• Most people achieve viral suppression by 6 months of initiation of ART.
Stable Adults and adolescents
(>10 yrs)
• PLHIV (Adult/Adolescent) shall be termed ‘Stable’ if they fulfill all of the
following criteria :
• Switch : when the regimen is changed due to ARV treatment failure, which is
switch of the entire regimen
• What to expect in first six months of therapy ?
Certain OIs and/or IRIS and/or early adverse drug reactions such as
drug hypersensitivity may develop,especially