Deep Learning: CNN

 We know it is good to learn a small model.

 From this fully connected model, do we really need all
the edges?
 Can some of these be shared?
Consider learning an image:

Some patterns are much smaller than

the whole image

Can represent a small region with fewer parameters

“beak” detector
Same pattern appears in different places:
They can be compressed!
What about training a lot of such “small” detectors
and each detector must “move around”.

“upper-left beak”
detector

They can be compressed

to the same parameters.

“middle beak”
detector
 A convolutional layer
A CNN is a neural network with some convolutional layers
(and some other layers). A convolutional layer has a number
of filters that does convolutional operation.

Beak detector

A filter
Convolution These are the network
parameters to be learned.

1 -1 -1
1 0 0 0 0 1 -1 1 -1 Filter 1
0 1 0 0 1 0 -1 -1 1
0 0 1 1 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0 -1 1 -1
0 1 0 0 1 0 -1 1 -1 Filter 2
0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 1 -1

…
…
6 x 6 image
Each filter detects a
small pattern (3 x 3).
 1 -1 -1
Convolution -1 1 -1 Filter 1
-1 -1 1
stride=1

1 0 0 0 0 1 Dot
product
0 1 0 0 1 0 3 -1
0 0 1 1 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0
0 1 0 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0

6 x 6 image
 1 -1 -1
Convolution -1 1 -1 Filter 1
-1 -1 1
If stride=2

1 0 0 0 0 1
0 1 0 0 1 0 3 -3
0 0 1 1 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0
0 1 0 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0

6 x 6 image
 1 -1 -1
Convolution -1 1 -1 Filter 1
-1 -1 1
stride=1

1 0 0 0 0 1
0 1 0 0 1 0 3 -1 -3 -1
0 0 1 1 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0 -3 1 0 -3
0 1 0 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0 -3 -3 0 1

6 x 6 image 3 -2 -2 -1
 -1 1 -1
Convolution -1 1 -1 Filter 2
-1 1 -1
stride=1
Repeat this for each filter
1 0 0 0 0 1
0 1 0 0 1 0 3 -1 -3 -1
-1 -1 -1 -1
0 0 1 1 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0 -3 1 0 -3
-1 -1 -2 1
0 1 0 0 1 0 Feature
0 0 1 0 1 0 -3 -3 Map
0 1
-1 -1 -2 1
6 x 6 image 3 -2 -2 -1
-1 0 -4 3
Two 4 x 4 images
Forming 2 x 4 x 4 matrix
 Color image: RGB 3 channels
11 -1-1 -1-1 -1-1 11 -1-1
1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1
-1-1 11 -1-1 -1-1-1 111 -1-1-1 Filter 2
-1 1 -1 Filter 1 -1 1 -1
-1-1 -1-1 11 -1-1 11 -1-1
-1 -1 1
Color image
1 0 0 0 0 1
1 0 0 0 0 1
0 11 00 00 01 00 1
0 1 0 0 1 0
0 00 11 01 00 10 0
0 0 1 1 0 0
1 00 00 10 11 00 0
1 0 0 0 1 0
0 11 00 00 01 10 0
0 1 0 0 1 0
0 00 11 00 01 10 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
Convolution v.s. Fully Connected

1 0 0 0 0 1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1
0 1 0 0 1 0 -1 1 -1 -1 1 -1
0 0 1 1 0 0 -1 -1 1 -1 1 -1
1 0 0 0 1 0
0 1 0 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
convolution
image

x1
1 0 0 0 0 1
0 1 0 0 1 0 x2
Fully- 0 0 1 1 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0
connected
…
…

…
…
0 1 0 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
x36
1 -1 -1 Filter 1 1 1
-1 1 -1 2 0
-1 -1 1 3 0
4 0 3
:

…
1 0 0 0 0 1
0 1 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 1 1 0 0 8 1
1 0 0 0 1 0 9 0
0 1 0 0 1 0 10: 0

…
0 0 1 0 1 0
13 0
6 x 6 image
14 0
fewer parameters! 15 1 Only connect to
16 1 9 inputs, not
fully connected
…
1 -1 -1 1 1
:2 0
-1 1 -1 Filter 1
:3 0
-1 -1 1
:4 0 3
:

…
1 0 0 0 0 1
0 1 0 0 1 0 7 0
:8 1
0 0 1 1 0 0
:9 0 -1
1 0 0 0 1 0
10:: 0
0 1 0 0 1 0

…
0 0 1 0 1 0
13 0
6 x 6 image
:
14 0
Fewer parameters :15 1
:
16 1 Shared weights
Even fewer parameters
:
…
The whole CNN
cat dog ……
Convolution

Max Pooling
Can repeat
Fully Connected many
Feedforward network
Convolution times

Max Pooling

Flattened
Max Pooling
1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1
-1 1 -1 Filter 1 -1 1 -1 Filter 2
-1 -1 1 -1 1 -1

3 -1 -3 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1

-3 1 0 -3 -1 -1 -2 1

-3 -3 0 1 -1 -1 -2 1

3 -2 -2 -1 -1 0 -4 3
Why Pooling
Subsampling pixels will not change the object
bird
bird

Subsampling

We can subsample the pixels to make image smaller

fewer parameters to characterize the image
A CNN compresses a fully connected
network in two ways:
Reducing number of connections
Shared weights on the edges
Max pooling further reduces the complexity
 Max Pooling

New image
1 0 0 0 0 1 but smaller
0 1 0 0 1 0 Conv
3 0
0 0 1 1 0 0 -1 1
1 0 0 0 1 0
0 1 0 0 1 0 Max 30 13
0 0 1 0 1 0 Pooling
2 x 2 image
6 x 6 image
Each filter
is a channel
The whole CNN
3 0
-1 1 Convolution

3 1
0 3
Max Pooling
Can repeat
A new image
many
Convolution times
Smaller than the original
image
The number of channels Max Pooling

is the number of filters

The whole CNN
cat dog ……
Convolution

Max Pooling

Fully Connected A new image

Feedforward network
Convolution

Max Pooling

Flattened A new image

 3
Flattening
0

1
3 0
-1 1 3

30 1 -1
3 Flattened
Fully Connected
1 Feedforward network

3
 Only modified the network structure and
CNN in Keras input format (vector -> 3-D tensor)

input

Convolution
1 -1 -1
-1 1 -1
-1 1 -1
-1 1 -1 … There are
-1 -1 1 25 3x3
-1 1 -1 … Max Pooling
filters.
Input_shape = ( 28 , 28 , 1)

28 x 28 pixels 1: black/white, 3: RGB Convolution

3 -1 3 Max Pooling

-3 1
 Only modified the network structure and
CNN in Keras input format (vector -> 3-D array)

Input
1 x 28 x 28

Convolution
How many parameters for
each filter? 9 25 x 26 x 26

Max Pooling
25 x 13 x 13

Convolution
How many parameters 225=
for each filter? 50 x 11 x 11
25x9
Max Pooling
50 x 5 x 5
 Only modified the network structure and
CNN in Keras input format (vector -> 3-D array)

Input
1 x 28 x 28

Output Convolution

25 x 26 x 26
Fully connected Max Pooling
feedforward network
25 x 13 x 13

Convolution
50 x 11 x 11

Max Pooling
1250 50 x 5 x 5
Flattened
AlphaGo

Next move
Neural
(19 x 19
Network positions)

19 x 19 matrix
Black: 1 Fully-connected feedforward
network can be used
white: -1
none: 0 But CNN performs much better
 AlphaGo’s policy network
The following is quotation from their Nature article:
Note: AlphaGo does not use Max Pooling.
CNN in speech recognition

The filters move in the

CNN frequency direction.
Frequency

Image Time
Spectrogram
CNN in text classification

Source of image: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.ed

u/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.703.6858
&rep=rep1&type=pdf