Financial Management course slides SPM
Financial Management course slides SPM
OF PIPED DRINKING
WATER SERVICE
DELIVERY ORGANIZATION
GOPAL NAIK
JJM Chair Professor
PRERONA SENGUPTA
Senior Research Associate JJM
OBJECTIVES
Objective 1 Objective 2 Objective 3
Participation
C O M M U N I T Y M A N A G E M E N T O F P I P E D D R I N K I N G WAT E R S Y S T E M I N V O LV E S
Central/State Community
government funding contributes partially
Infra development towards the set-up
cost
User charges
Central/State Govt
collection from each
support for O&M
households
User Charge
determination
• Determination of the optimal user
charge is critical for financial
sustainability.
• Regular collection of user charges
can ensure efficiency in water
delivery system
USER
CHARGE
Public infrastructure projects like JJM
require cost recovery to ensure timely
repair and maintenance and operate
effectively .
USER
CHARGE
• Cost recovery through user charges can
improve water allocation and encourage
conservation
Profit maximization
Demand for Piped
Drinking Water
• Demand for pi ped wat er syst ems depends on
availability of al ternat i ve sources of water and
seasonality and percept ion about quality, quantity,
regularity and pri ces of piped water.
Information about
how communities Information about
can manage to community
reduce water management
charges
I M P O RTA N C E O F U N D E R S TA N D I N G
• It is important to understand the full cost of servicing water delivery to examine the
COSTS
component of costs and how to recover them. For this purpose, the capital cost needs to
be computed of each year to combine it with the operations and maintenance cost to
arrive at the full cost.
• While depreciation and amortization are two methods of arriving annualized fixed cost,
for our purpose the appropriate method is amortization. Depreciation alone cannot take
care of full fixed cost as it only accounts for the book value of the capital cost.
• Along with the capital cost, there is opportunity cost, the return from a next best
alternative investment, that needs to be included, and hence amortized amount is taken
as the fixed cost. This approach also helps in taking care of inflation in prices of assets
at the time of their replacement.
COSTING METHODS
CAPITAL COSTS OPERATING EXPENSES
Minimum threshold of
Full cost recovery from the
recovering the Operational
households
and Maintenance Cost
Profit maximization
USER
• CHARGE
Though, the full cost recovery helps in ensuring
timely repair and maintenance as well as
replacement can be done when needed, at the very
least such projects envisage covering operations and
maintenance expenses
APPROACH
service provider charges the
Cost/Price
2.5
same amount tariff for a Flat pricing
Volumetric tariff
6
5
Cost
0
Quantity 1 Quantity 2 Volumetric tariff Quantity 3 Quantity 4
Quantity
REVENUE: SURPLUS/DEFICIT
• Annual total cost is deducted from the amount of
total water charges levied per year for the total
number of households to obtain surplus or deficit
over the total cost
• Similarly, the total annual operating cost is deducted
from the amount of total water charges levied per
year for total number of households which reflects
whether there is a surplus or deficit over total annual
operating cost.
ILLUSTRATION OF
UNIT COST
COMPUTATION
MVS, SVS AND IVDS
• Jal Jeevan Mission has been implemented through two types of
schemes: Multi-village Scheme (MVS) with In-Village Distribution
System (IVDS) and Single Village Scheme (SVS).
• In the case of MVS-IVDS system, the unit cost is computed at MVS level
as well at individual IVDS level. While MVS costs are directly relevant to
concerned IVDS, the extent of burden depends on the State
Government Policy.
• The Kamapalli habitation’s total cost of water supply infrastructure was INR 14,76,136
that catered water to 103 households, indicating that the average investment per
household is INR 14,331.
• A solar pump is also installed at the second tube well, but it hasn’t incurred any
maintenance cost till date. Assuming the maintenance cost will be 0.5% of the fixed
cost, the annual maintenance cost works out to be INR 7,380.
• Currently, the water charges collected is INR 5.50 per kl, volumetric pricing, for
consumption of <5 kl, which has been decided unanimously by the community.
COST COMPUTATION FOR SVS
COST
•
COMPUTATION FOR SVS
Based on the total fixed cost, operational cost, and annual water demand
for an estimated future population of 857, the actual cost per kl of water
works out to be INR 7.18 (Table 6), which is more than the current water
charge of INR 5.50 per kl.
• If we consider the current actual population of 496, the fixed cost works out
to be INR 9.05 per kl, while the operational expense is INR 3.36 per kl.
• The total cost then amounts to INR 12.41 per kl (Table 7). If the VWSC
decides to have ownership of the infrastructure and its upgradation during
the end of the current design period, then the revision of monthly charges
needs to consider recovery of the total cost of INR 12.41 per kl.