FPM Chapter 1
FPM Chapter 1
43
3.1. WHO IDENTIFIES PROJECTS?
Small producers organizations/producers’ unions;
Large scale individual private sector producers;
Product marketing organizations;
Private sector companies (local/multinational);
State owned enterprises and organizations;
Government ministries, authorities;
Local/International Development Banks and Agencies;
Aid agencies /self-aid associations;
Local/State/Regional/Sub-regional Government Authorities;
Local political and pressure groups - opposition parties;
Local/ International NGOs;
Credit institutions and cooperatives, etc. 44
How Project Ideas Come About?
Observation of existing opportunities and problems
Opportunity studies by central government ministries;
Sectoral/sub-sectoral programs of technical ministries (eg;
health, agriculture, tourism, education, industry, etc);
Surveys conducted by local/ regional governments;
Review of past projects;
Private sector, cooperatives, and state enterprise plans;
Investment identification by development banks/ agencies;
Brainstorming (unsystematic discussions);
Need analysis (existence of unsatisfied demand); and
Need to tackle unexpected or undesirable events (drought,
earthquake, flood, etc). 45
3.2.2 MACRO AND MICRO SOURCES
Projects are expected to contribute towards the
attainment of specified development objectives.
Project ideas often are not derived from national
and/or sectoral plans in practice - may originate
from several sources.
We can distinguish two levels where project ideas
are born:
1. Macro sources
2. Micro sources
46
3.2.1. MICRO SOURCES
Project ideas generally should aim at overcoming constraints on national
development efforts or meeting unsatisfied needs/demand.
47
Cont’d
• A micro source of projects is not as big as macro sources but it is carried
at the levels other than the government. At micro level project ideas can
be generated from various sources. Some of these are discussed below.
1. Analysis of the performance of existing industries
2. Examination of the input-outputs of various industries
3. Review of imports and exports
4. Investigation of local materials and resources
5. Analysis of economic and social changes
6. Exploring the possibility of reviving sick units
7. Study of new technological developments
8. Identification of unfulfilled psychological needs
9. Attending trade fairs
10. Stimulating creativity for generation’s new product lines
01/17/25 48
3.2.2. MACRO SOURCES
• A macro source of project identification requires more investment of
time and cost.
• Government is the major source of project ideas in developing
countries because it has the necessary resources for undertaking
opportunity studies (conduct survey, studies, and reviews) better
access to data and information; familiar with the development
objectives, priorities, and strategies
1. Project ideas from government policies and plan
2. Project ideas from local leaders
3. Project ideas from Entrepreneurs
01/17/25 49
Major Macro Sources:
Federal/Central or Regional Governments
Bilateral and Multilateral Agreements
International Development Agencies
Government is the major source of project
ideas in developing countries. Reasons:
Has the necessary resources for undertaking
opportunity studies;
Better access to data and information;
Familiar with the development objectives, priorities, and
strategies.
50
3.3. PROCESS OF IDEA GENERATION
Undertaking formal project identification studies
(including opportunity studies).
Identification studies may involve
area studies,
industry studies,
resource-base studies, and
sectoral studies.
51
The process involves
Surveying, reviewing, and analyzing existing policies,
resource endowments, and socio-economic variables
Natural Resources: review of the natural resource
endowments of the country.
Human Resource: review of educational standards/facility
Socio-Economic Variables: review of various socio-
economic factors (includes: housing facilities/utilities
services/health & nutrition services/income distribution).
Field Survey and Interview
Survey people needs/problems.
Asking the public their community needs
52
CONT’D
Observing and Analyzing Prevailing Situation
Current DD & SS;
Examination of past and future consumption /production
trends for goods/services;
Possibilities for improvement of goods and services (both in
terms of quality & quantity);
Observing opportunities & threats in the invention &
introduction of new technologies, etc.
Participating in Deliberations, Discussions, and
Trainings
seminars, workshops, and conferences (local and/or
international) levels.
Brainstorming
Group of people suggesting different ideas
53
(Informal).
3.4. TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP
APPROACHES
Top-Down Approach:
Projects are identified at:
higher planning (or macro) level
implemented at the decision of top officials.
Based on the national plan and strategies.
problem might be clearly visible
Often have long-term orientations.
May encounter resistance as the people in the context
might lack interest to cooperate with.
54
3.4. TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP
APPROACHES contd..
Bottom-Up Approach:
– survey of resources, key development problems, and
resources.
– Based on the realities existing in the locality.
– May focus on short-term
– Projects easy to implement
– Project’s benefits are easily visualized by the society.
– Likely to get substantial community support.
– Might help to create good will (positive images) towards
the institution/the promoter.
55
3.5. SCREENING POTENTIALLY
PROMISING IDEAS
Screening Criteria:
Compatibility with the promoter
Consistency with government priorities
Availability of inputs
Adequacy of market
Reasonableness of costs
Acceptability of risk level
Eliminate (screen out) project proposals that:
Are technically unsound and risky
Have no market for their outputs
Have inadequate supply of inputs
Are very costly in relation to the expected benefits
Assume an overambitious sales and profitability target
56
3.6. PROBLEMS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF
PROJECT IDEAS
Ambiguity about the National Development Goals
(Objectives)
People might not clearly know the national
development goals.
Development goals may not be well communicated, or
not substantially supported by other stakeholders.
Priority Issues in the Existing Development Goals
(Objectives)
Conflict of views regarding the development priorities
and goals
Lack of interest and commitment towards the
pursuit/realization of these goals.
Differences regarding aspects of national priority.
Differences in prioritizing sectoral goals. 57
CONT’D
Problems Associated with Data/Information
Problems in data and information flow
Constraint for accessing data
Limited availability of data and information
Available data may not be dependable/reliable
Conflict of Interest between Local Beneficiary
Groups
What are the costs and benefits of the project?
Who bear the cost? Who obtains the benefit in the
society?
Do benefits accrue to those groups in the society who
bear the cost?
If yes, all right!
If no, find mechanisms to compensate those who bear
the cost
58
PROJECT PLANNING
Effective total program planning cannot be
accomplished unless all of the necessary
information becomes available at project
initiation. These information requirements
are:
Statement of work (SOW)
Project specifications
Work breakdown structure (WBS)
59
1. The statement of work (SOW) is a narrative
description of the work to be accomplished with its
objective, work description, funding, the specification
and the schedule.
2. Project specification: Specifications are used for
man-hour, equipment, and material estimates.
Specifications are, in fact, standards for pricing out a
proposal. If specifications do not exist or are not
necessary, then work standards should be included in
the proposal.
3. Work Breakdown Structure: The successful
accomplishment of both contract and corporate
objectives requires a plan that defines all effort to be
expended, assigns responsibility to a specially
identified organizational element, and establishes
schedules and budgets for the accomplishment of the 60
work.
Cont’d
In planning a project, the project manager must structure
the work into small elements that are:
Manageable, in that specific authority and
responsibility can be assigned
Independent, or with minimum interfacing with and
dependence on other ongoing elements
Measurable in terms of progress
62
Cont’d
Example1:
ABC Cables is bringing a new product on line to be
manufactured in their current facility in existing space. The
owners have identified 11 activities and their precedence
relationships. Develop an AOA for the project from the following
details.
Solution
Draw the diagram
How long it takes to complete the project?
Identify the critical Path
64
PROJECT ANALYSIS
Feasibility studies are detailed analysis of
the project in different dimensions that
lead to an investment decision.
It provides information required for the
project appraisal.
It is similar in content with the pre-
feasibility study except it is done in detail
with greatest accuracy in an iterative
optimization process.
65
Major dimensions of feasibility
studies:
66
A. Market and Demand
Analysis
Collection
of Demand
Secondary Forecastin
Information g
Situational Analysis
and Specification of Characterizatio
Objectives n of the Market
Conduct of Market
Market Planning
67
Survey
Demand Forecasting
After gathering information about the
various aspects of the market and demand
from primary and secondary sources,
attempt may be made to estimate future
demand. A wide range of forecasting
method is available to the market analyst.
68
a) Qualitative Methods
(i) Jury of executive opinion method:
under this method opinions are sought from a
group of managers on the expected future sales
they are then translated into sales estimates
(Top – Down Approach)
(ii) Delphi method: opinions are sought from
a group of experts who don’t know the identity of
each other, any divergent opinions are then
mailed back to back for further opinion until a
consensus is obtained.
(iii) Salesmen opinion method: This method
uses information from salesmen to forecast
demand in the future (Bottom – up Method)
69
b) Quantitative Methods
(i) Trend Analysis or Time series Analysis:
This involves determining the trend of
consumption by analyzing past consumptions
data and then projecting future consumption by
extrapolating the trend. The most common
method of extrapolation is the linear regression.
This is given by the expression
Y = a + bx where;
t
70
71
Example
72
73
Exponential Smoothign
Method
74
Moving Average Method
The forecast for the next period represent
a simple arithmetic average or a weighted
arithmetic average of the last few periods.
75
Based on the above data forecast the
demand for the next two years using the
simple moving average of the recent three
years
Assume a weight of 0.5 has been assigned
for the recent data followed by weights of
0.3, 0.2.
76
Causal Method
High – Low method
It use only the highest and lowest observation
values of the dependent and independent variables.
The demand function is estimated by using these
two points to calculate the slope coefficient and the
constant or intercept.
Slope coefficient (b)= difference between the
highest demand and lowest demand in the past
divided by the difference between the highest and
the lowest of the independent variable.
To compute the constant (Y intercept), we can use
either the highest or the lowest observations of the
data.
77
Both calculations yield the same
answer because the solution
technique solves two linear
equations with two unknowns, the
slope coefficients and constant:
Y= a + bx
a= Y- b.X
78
Example
79
Regression Analysis
It involves extrapolation the past trend of
demand with identified factor affecting the
demand such as income to project the
future consumption.
It measures the average amount of
change in the dependent variables
associated with a unit change in one or
more independent variables associated
with a unit change in one or more
independent variables.
80
Example
81
Solution
82
Technical Dimension
comprising:
83
FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
85
NON-DISCOUNTED MEASURE OF PROJECT
WORTH
1. PAYBACK PERIOD
Pay back period is the number of years required
to return the original investment.
Payback is often used as a "first screening
method".
Acceptance Rule
Accepted Project if it’s payback period is less
Formulae:
Payback Period with equal cash inflows.
87
Project X Project Y
Year Net cash Accumulated Net cash Accumulated Net
inflow Net cash inflow cash inflow
inflow
1 30,000 30,000 40,000 40,000
2 50,000 80,000 30,000 70,000
3 20,000 1,00,000 15,000 85,000
4 60,000 1,60,000 15,000 1,00000
5 40,000 2,00,000 50,000 1,50,000
90
3. NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV):
NPV is the net sum of total discounted benefits (cash
inflows) and total discounted costs. It represents the
present worth of an investment in excess of the
investment itself.
Where:
CFt
NPV=
(1 r ) t C0
CF = Cash inflows at different periods
r = discounting rate
C0 = cash outflow in the beginning
Acceptance Rule
t = time period
Accept the project when NPV is positive NPV > 0
Reject the project when NPV is negative NPV < 0
May accept the project when NPV is zero NPV = 0
91
NPV
All future cash flows should be discounted
into present values. The discount factor is:
92
NPV calculations –example, r=8%
Question: Compute the NPV for project A &
Project B:
year Cash flows for Project A Cash flows for Project B
0 (120,000) (75,000)
1 40,000 5,000
2 25,000 70,000
3 70,000 45,000
4 130,000 30,000
5 80,000 5,000
93
Solution
year Project A Discount factor Discounted cash flow
= -120,000
0 (120,000)
1 40,000 37,037
2 25,000 21,433
3 70,000 55,568
4 130,000 95,554
5 80,000 54,447
Project B
0 (75,000) ($75,000)
1 (5,000) 4,630)
2 70,000 60,014
3 45,000 35,723
4 30,000 22,051
5 5,000 3,403
4. Internal Rate of Return (IRR):
95
The NPV Curve The project IRR= 0.0547
96
Example 1: You buy a new piece of equipment for $16,980,
and you receive a cash inflow of $3,000 per year for 12 years.
What is the internal rate of return?
Solution:
Appendix D
$16,980
PVIFA 5.660
$3,000
IRR = 14%
For n = 12, we find 5.660 under the 14% column.
97
5. Benefit Cost ratio (BCR) or
Profitability Index (PI)
Profitability index identifies the relationship of investment
to payoff of a proposed project.
98
ORGANISATION
In Project Management
107
Choosing the Appropriate Project Management
Structure (cont’d)
Project Considerations
Size of project
Strategic importance
Novelty and need for innovation
Need for integration (number of departments
involved)
Environmental complexity (number of external
interfaces)
Budget and time constraints
Stability of resource requirements
IMPLEMENTATION:Mea
IMPLEMENTATION:
ning
Process whereby “project inputs are
converted to project outputs”. May be
looked at as:
Putting in action the activities of the project
Putting into practice what was proposed in the
project document (i.e. transforming the project
proposal into the actual project)
Management of the project or executing the
project intentions
Project implementation
phase includes...
Project activation
This means making arrangements to have the
project started. It involves coordination and
allocation of resources to make project operational.
Project operation
This is practical management of a project. Here,
project inputs are transformed into outputs to
achieve immediate objectives.
Other typical
implementation problems
Poor scheduling of projects leading to delays in
implementation.
Misallocation of funds
Lack of accountability and transparency
Bureaucracy in decision-making.
Selfishness/nepotism/favouritism by some project managers.
Weak monitoring systems
Natural calamities like drought, earthquakes, landslides,
Migration of beneficiaries
Lack of team work
Lack of incentives for implementers
Project controlling
Control is a management function which is the
process of monitoring, evaluating and comparing
planned results with actual results to determine
the progress torward the project cost, schedule,
and technical performance objectives, as well as
the project's ”strategic fit” with enterprise
purposes.
It's role is more predictive than investigative and
answers the question what may happen according
to the management type than what has happened.
Steps in control cycle
(1)
Establishing
standards
(4)
(2)
Taking
Observing
corrective
performance
action
(3)
Comparing actual
performance
Monitoring &
Evaluation
Monitoring is to keep track of and to check
systematically all project activities.
Evaluation is the examination and appraisal of
how things are going on the project.
Monitoring and Evaluation of the project require
that the project team look inward to the project
and the sponsoring organization as well as
outward to the stakeholders and the general
”system” enviroment.
Monitoring
In developing a system of monitoring, the
following points should be considered:
focus sharply on the critical aspects of project
implementation
lay more emphasis on physical milestones and
not on financial targets
must be kept relatively simple
monitoring is not an end in itself rather as a
means to implement the project successfully
Evaluation
Evaluation is mainly concerned with determining
whether the planned benefits of the project have
materialized and distributed to the beneficiaries of the
project.
Evaluation takes longer time and requires more
specialist skills than monitoring.
Ex-post/post audit action of a project control:
provide a documented log of experience that help in improving
future decision making
identify individual with superior abilities in planning and
forecasting
discover systematic biases in judgment
serve as a useful training ground for promising executives