0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views48 pages

Tema 0 - Presentacion Del Curso

The document outlines the course 'English for Professional and Academic Purposes' taught by Prof. Sancho Guinda at the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, focusing on a hands-on, cooperative learning approach. It details the course structure, evaluation criteria, and specific modules, emphasizing project-based and task-based learning. Additionally, it includes information on class routines, materials, and the instructor's background.

Uploaded by

Pedro Melendez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views48 pages

Tema 0 - Presentacion Del Curso

The document outlines the course 'English for Professional and Academic Purposes' taught by Prof. Sancho Guinda at the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, focusing on a hands-on, cooperative learning approach. It details the course structure, evaluation criteria, and specific modules, emphasizing project-based and task-based learning. Additionally, it includes information on class routines, materials, and the instructor's background.

Uploaded by

Pedro Melendez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 48

Course presentation

ENGLISH for
PROFESSIONAL and
ACADEMIC
PURPOSES Prof. SANCHO GUINDA – 2021-22
Sección Departamental de Lingüística Aplicada a la Ciencia
y la Tecnología
UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID
Overview
• Course drives
• Ethos
• Contents
– Subject structure
– Specific instruction module (30%)
– Materials
• Class routine
• Work chronogram
• Evaluation criteria
• Attention hours
• About me
Course
drives
2. Hands-on approach = Learn
by doing

PBL + TBL* for authenticity &


motivation

* Project-based and task-based


3. Cooperative learning (team
dynamics)
4. Formative evaluation  Bloom’s
taxonomy
Ethos
LEARNING COMMUNITY
• Self-fulfilment (Maslow-based)

• Peer interaction +
collaboration + feedback +
assistance (mentorship)
• Interdisciplinarity &
expandability (networking with other
subjects, degrees, schools, universities and
members of the educational community)
• Class delegates (one per
degree)
• Team work & peer feedback
• Workteam leader
– Preferably high linguistic proficiency
– Interaction with teacher on behalf of the group
– Feedback reception and group coordination
MENTORSHIP report
scheme
Mentee • Prior to task submission

Mentee
• Videotaped lab procedure
group
Grid with mentee’s errors for
class discussion
Intergroup
peer feedback

TEACHER CLASS
DISCUSSION
Content
s
• Students are kindly
reminded to read the
Learning Guide
document uploaded in
the School’s website
Subject
structur
e
SUBJECT STRUCTURE
COMMON
SPECIFIC CORE
MODULE

30%

70%

COMMON CORE SPECIFIC MODULE


• 70% common to all
degrees and teachers
– Book Cambridge English for
Engineering (units 1-6)  EXAM on
listening comprehension, grammar,
vocabulary, and discourse strategies
(40 points)
– READING COMPREHENSION TESTS on
engineering texts (15 points: 7.5
each)
– ORAL PRESENTATION on visual data
commentary (15 points)
• 30% of specific
instruction freely chosen
by each teacher
• Two collaborative tasks based
on skills:
• Procedural description (15 points)
• Feasibility report portfolio (15
points)
_ Abstract
_ One-line summary
Common
core
section
(70%)
• Weight of items within
the common core section
– Final EXAM  40%
– READING COMPREHENSION
TEST on 2
academic/professional texts 
15%
– ORAL PRESENTATION  15%
– ORAL PRESENTATION
• Individual performance
• 3MT format
– One single slide
– No animations, props, slide transitions,
sounds and video files, costumes or
background music allowed
– Laser pointers discouraged
– Limited use of quotes
– Duration: 3min max.
• On visual data commentary assigned
by teacher
Specific
instruction
module
(30%)
• PBL portfolio

– ‘Sustainability’ or/and
‘emotional design’ as pivoting
principles
• Sustainability
– Usually defined as the
avoidance of the depletion of
natural resources in order to
maintain an ecological balance

– Its 3 principles or pillars are:


environmental, economic, and
social
• Emotional design
– Emotional design is the concept of how to
create designs that evoke emotions which
result in positive user experiences.
– Designers aim to reach users on three
cognitive levels—visceral, behavioural and
reflective—so users develop only positive
associations (sometimes including negative
emotions) with products, brands, etc.
• “Everything has a personality: everything sends
an emotional signal. Even where this was not the
intention of the designer, the people who view the
website infer personalities and experience
emotions.”
• Weight of items within
the specific module
section
– Procedural description  15%
– Feasibility report  15%
– Report body  10 points
– Abstract  2.5 points
– One-line summary  2.5 points
• Procedural description
(1,000 words max.)

• Project portfolio–related
genres
– Feasibility report (3,000 words
max.)
• Abstract (250 words max.)
• One-line summary (20-25 words max.)
Materia
ls
• All the necessary
materials will be gradually
incorporated and available
in the corresponding
Moodle site
– The teacher may upload other
useful materials as the course
progresses
• Engineering book PDF + 2
readings
• PPTs for theoretical input on
every portfolio item
• Additional lexico-grammatical and
stylistic notes and exercises
• Occasional FYI readings on
sustainability, emotional design,
group dynamics, etc.
• FAQs concerning genres and style
Class
routine
• Schedule
• M401 & D402
• Mon. 12.00-14.00h
• Tues. 9.30-11.30h
• A408 & EE402
• Tues. 17.30-19.30h
• Thurs. 17.30-19.30h
• Online teaching
– Occasional face-to-face collective
attention hours before exam

• Class contents and


assignments timely
announced face-to-face or
via Moodle session by
session
• In-class time band distribution
– 1 hour for book lesson
• Complementary sources for topic learning
– 1 hour for task-related learning
• Task-related genres
– Procedural descriptions
– Oral presentations (conventional + 3MT)
– Abstracts and one-line summary
– Visual data commentary
– Feasibility report
• ‘Syntactic cases’ section
• Teacher & peer feedback on work in
progress
• Queries
Chronogra
m
(flexible)
SEPTEMBER
WEEK MONDAY THURSDAY
9
• Course presentation
1 • Intro to communication
• Lesson 1 (start)
• Procedural descriptions

13 16
2 • Lesson 1 (cont.) • Lesson 1 (cont.)
• Procedural descriptions • Procedural descriptions

20 23
3 • Lesson 1 (end) • Lesson 2 (start)
• Procedural descriptions • Procedural descriptions

27 30
4 • Lesson 2 (cont.) • Lesson 2 (cont.)
• Oral presentations • Oral presentations
OCTOBER
WEEK MONDAY THURSDAY
4 7
• Lesson 2 (end) • Lesson 3 (start)
5 • Oral presentations • Abstracts

11 14
6 • Lesson 3 (cont.) NO CLASS
• Abstracts (TUESDAY SCHEDULE)
18 21
7 • Lesson 3 (cont.) • Lesson 3 (end)
• Abstracts • Abstracts

25 28
8 • Lesson 4 (start) • Lesson 4 (cont.)
• Interviews • Interviews

DEADLINE FOR TEAM FORMATION & COMMUNICATION TO TEACHER


TASK DELIVERY: PROCEDURAL DESCRIPTION (Oct. 25-29)
NOVEMBER
WEEK MONDAY THURSDAY
3 (WEDNESDAY) 4
(MONDAY SCHEDULE) • Lesson 4 (end)
9 • Lesson 4 (cont.) • Data commentary I
• Interviews

8 11
10 • Lesson 5 (start) • Lesson 5 (cont.)
• Data commentary II • Data commentary III

15 18
11 • Lesson 5 (cont.) • Lesson 5 (end)
• Data commentary IV • Data commentary V

22 25
12 • Lesson 6 (start) • Lesson 6 (cont.)
• Feasibility reports • Feasibility reports
DECEMBER
WEEK MONDAY THURSDAY
29 NOV. 2
13 • Lesson 6 (cont.) • Lesson 6 (end)
• Blogs + economic & • Blogs
promotional language

6 9
14 NO CLASS EXAM REVIEW
(FEAST DAY)

13 16
15 DAY RESERVED FOR EXAM DAY RESERVED FOR EXAM

20
16 DAY RESERVED FOR EXAM

TASK DELIVERY: DATA GROUP TASK DELIVERY: INDIVIDUAL TASK DELIVERY:


COMMENTARY PORTFOLIO RECORDED 3MT ORAL PRESENTATION
(29 Nov.-3 Dic) (13-17 Dec.) (13-17 Dec.)
Evaluation
• Specific RUBRICS for each
genre/item to be uploaded in
Moodle
• Each item must be passed with
50% of the points assigned,
regardless of the evaluation option
• In the formative
evaluation/assessment, peer
feedback may be also incorporated
in certain tasks/genres
• Those students choosing summative
evaluation/assessment (final exam
option) must fill in the form
facilitated by the Departmental
Section
• Items’ weight:
– Final EXAM  65%
– READING COMPREHENSION TEST on 2
academic or professional texts  15%
– ORAL PRESENTATION  15%
– SUMMARY of readings and presentation
to be submitted 2 weeks before the final
exam (2,500-3,000 words max. )  5%
Attention
hours
• 2 consultations per
group obligatory
– Beginning and midway
progress of project work
– Either by the whole group
or by a spokesperson
• Please respect schedules and access
channels
– E-mails replied during attention hours only
– All consultations by appointment

GROUPS SCHEDULE E-MAIL ADDRESS

M401 Tues. 12-14h


D402 Thurs. 10-14h carmen.sguinda@u
(by appointment)
A408 pm.es
EE408
About
me
• Teacher at the ETSI Aeronautica y del
Espacio (UPM) over 30 years
• Profile in research networks:
Academia.edu
http://upm-es.academia.edu/CarmenSanchoGuinda
ResearchGate
https://
www.researchgate.net/profile/Carmen-Guinda
Emo-Fundett project
http://
emofundett.weebly.com/carmen-sancho-guinda.htm
l
Linkedin
https
://www.linkedin.com/in/carmen-sancho-guinda-b844
3345/?

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy