The document discusses the economics of strategy, focusing on competition, market structures, and the identification of competitors. It outlines concepts such as direct and indirect competitors, market concentration, and the characteristics of perfect competition, monopoly, and monopolistic competition. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of value disciplines and the implications of strategic choices on a firm's operations.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views39 pages
CH 05#HRN
The document discusses the economics of strategy, focusing on competition, market structures, and the identification of competitors. It outlines concepts such as direct and indirect competitors, market concentration, and the characteristics of perfect competition, monopoly, and monopolistic competition. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of value disciplines and the implications of strategic choices on a firm's operations.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 39
COME BACK AGAIN !!!
ECONOMIC OF STRATEGY HOIRUN NISA Reflections and Home Work
1. Value Proposition
2. Jelaskan Tiga "Value Disciplines“
3. Mengapa Sebuah Perusahaan Harus Memilih Satu "Value Discipline" Untuk
Dikuasai, Dan Apa Implikasinya Terhadap Strategi Dan Operasional
Perusahaan?
4. Bagaimana Cara Menentukan "Value Discipline"
Economics of Strategy Seventh Edition Besanko, Dranove, Shanley, and Schaefer
Chapter 5
Competitors and Competition
Copyright 2016 John Wiley Sons, Inc.
Competition
If one firm’s strategic choice adversely affects
the performance of another they are competitors
A firm may have competitors in several input
markets and output markets at the same time
Competition can be either direct or indirect
Direct and Indirect Competitors
Direct competitors: Strategic choice of one firm
directly affects the performance of the other. Contoh : Sturbucks , Dunkin Donuts, MCD
Indirect competitors: Strategic choice of one
firm affects the performance of the other because of a strategic reaction by a third firm. (They Compete for the same product) Identifying Competitors
In practice any one who produces a substitute
product is a competitor
Two products tend to be close substitutes when
they have similar performance characteristics they have similar occasion for use and they are sold in the same geographic area Performance Characteristics
Performance characteristics describe what the
product does to the customer
Example from automobiles
Seating capacity Curb appeal
Power and handling
Reliability Occasion for Use
Products may share characteristics but may
differ in the way they are used
Orange juice and cola are beverages but used in
different occasions
Another example: Hiking shoes versus court
shoes Empirical Approaches to Competitor Identification
areas, it is important to be able identify the competitor in each area
Rather than rely on geographical demarcations,
the firm should look at the flow of goods and services across geographic regions Identifying Competitors in the Area
Step 1: Locate the catchment area. (where the
customers come from) Step 2: Find out where the residents of the catchment area shop With some products like books and drugs being sold over the internet identifying geographic competition becomes more difficult Market Structure
Markets are often described by the degree of
concentration
Monopoly is one extreme with the highest
concentration - one seller
Perfect competition is the other extreme with
innumerable sellers Measures of Market Structure
The N-firm concentration ratio
(the combined market share of the largest N firms) Herfindahl index (the sum of squared market shares) When the relative size of the largest firms is important Herfindahl is likely to be more informative Harfindahl Index dan Concentration Ratio HHI = Σ (Si)² , di mana Si adalah pangsa pasar perusahaan i Perfect Competition
Many sellers who sell a homogenous good
Many well informed buyers
Consumers can costlessly shop around
Sellers can enter and exit costlessly
Each firm faces infinitely elastic demand
Zero Profit Condition
With perfect competition economic profits go to
zero When profits are maximized percentage contribution margin or PCM = 1/ where is the elasticity of demand In perfect competition is infinity and hence PCM = 0 Conditions for Fierce Price Competition
Even if the ideal conditions are not present, price
competition can be fierce when two or more of the following conditions are met. There are many sellers Customers perceive the product to be homogenous
There is excess capacity
Many Sellers
Even when the industry is profitable, a low cost
producer may prefer to set a low price
With many sellers, cartels and collusive
agreements harder to create and sustain
Small players will be tempted to cheat and small
cheaters may go undetected Homogeneous Products
Three sources of increased revenue when price
is lowered Customers buying more
New customers buying
Customers switching from the competitors
Excess Capacity
When a firm is operating below full capacity it
can price below average cost to cover the variable cost If industry has excess capacity, prices fall below average cost and some firms may choose to exit If exit is not an option (capacity is industry specific) excess capacity and losses will persist for a while Monopoly
A monopolist faces little or no competition in
the output market
Monopolist can act in an unconstrained way in
setting prices or quality, subject to demand
If some fringe firms exist, their decisions do not
materially affect the monopolist’s profits Monopoly
A monopolist faces a downward sloping
demand curve Monopolist sets the price so that marginal revenue equals marginal cost Thus the monopolist’s price is above the marginal cost and its output below the competitive level Monopoly and Innovation
A monopolist often succeeds in becoming one
by either producing more efficiently than others in the industry or meeting the consumers’ needs better than others
Hence, consumers may be net beneficiaries in
situations where a firm succeeds in becoming a monopolist Monopoly and Innovation
Monopolists are more likely to be innovative
(than firms facing perfect competition) since they can capture some of the benefits of successful innovation
Since consumers also benefit from these
innovations, they are hurt in the long run if the monopolist’s profits are restricted Monopolistic Competition
There are many sellers and they believe that
their actions will not materially affect their competitors Each seller sells a differentiated product Unlike under perfect competition, in monopolistic competition each firm’s demand curve is downward sloping rather than flat Vertical and Horizontal Differentiation
Vertically differentiated products
unambiguously differ in quality Horizontally differentiated products vary in certain product characteristics to appeal to different consumer groups An important source of horizontal differentiation is geographical location Geography and Horizontal Differentiation
Grocery stores attract clientele based on their
location
Consumers choose the store based on
“transportation costs”
Transportation costs prevent switching for small
differences in price Idiosyncratic Preferences
Horizontal differentiation is possible with
idiosyncratic preferences
Location and Taste are important sources of
idiosyncratic preferences
Search costs discourage switching when prices
are raised Search Costs and Differentiation
Search cost: Cost of finding information about
alternatives
Low cost sellers try lower the search costs
(Example: Advertising)
Some markets have high search costs (Example:
Physicians) Monopolistic Competition and Entry
Since each firm’s demand curve is downward
sloping, the price will be set above marginal cost
If price exceeds average cost, the firm will earn
economic profit
Existence of economic profits will attract new
entrants until each firm’s economic profit is zero Monopolistic Competition and Entry
Even if entry does not lower prices (highly
differentiated products), new entrants will take away market share from the incumbents The drop in revenue caused by entry will reduce the economic profit If there is price competition (products that are not well differentiated) the erosion of economic profit will be quicker Monopolistic Competition and Entry
Customer loyalty allows prices to exceed
marginal cost and encourages entry Entry considered excessive if fixed costs go up due to entry without a reduction in prices If entry increases variety valued by customers, then entry cannot be considered excessive Oligopoly
Market has a small number of sellers
Pricing and output decisions by each firm
affects the price and output in the industry
Oligopoly models (Cournot, Bertrand) focus on
how firms react to each other’s moves Market Structure: Causes
Theory would predict that the larger the
minimum efficient scale (MES) of production the greater will be the concentration. If entry is not easy concentration will be the result Monopolistic competition would mean easier entry and larger number of firms Endogenous Sunk Costs
Consumer goods markets seem to have a few
large firms and many small firms
The number of large firms and the total number
of firms depend more on advertising costs than production costs (Sutton)
All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that
permitted in section 117 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without express permission from the copyright owner is unlawful. Requests for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his/her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The Publisher assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information herein.