Module-3 (SIBM)
Module-3 (SIBM)
BUSINESS
MANAGEMENT
[MBA BATCH- 2024-26, SEM- II]
TOPICS:-
1. Sale of Goods Act: Definition of
Contract of Sales,
2. Essential conditions and warranties,
3. Transfer of the Title,
4. Rights of buyers and unpaid sellers,
5. Caveat Emptor
1. SALE OF GOODS ACT: DEFINITION OF
CONTRACT OF SALES :-
CONTINUED:-
• Till 1930, the law relating to sale and purchase of goods were regulated by
the Indian Contract Act,1872.
• In 1930, sections 76 to 123 of the Indian contract act, 1872 were repealed
and separate act called ‘The Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930 was passed. It
came into force on 1st July 1930 with effect from 22nd September 1963.
• According to section 4(1), of the Sale of goods act, 1930 ‘Contract of sale
of goods is a contract whereby the seller transfer or agrees to transfer the
property in goods to the buyer for a price’.
• A contract of Sale of goods include both (i) sale and (ii) an agreement to
sell Sale: Ownership in the goods is transferred by the seller to the buyer
immediately at the time of contract,
• Whereas Agreement to sell: The transfer of ownership in goods is to take
place, at a future time or subject to fulfillment of some condition.
5
CONTINUED:-
ESSENTIALS OF A CONTRACT OF SALE
•Two parties i.e. Buyer and Seller
•Goods
•Transfer of the property in goods
•All Essential elements of a valid contract must be
fulfilled
•Price
•Include both sale and agreement to sale.
6
AND WARRANTIES,
• Conditions and warranties are important terms that are often included in contracts of sale.
• The Sale of Goods Act, 1930, specifies provisions related to conditions and warranties in
Sections 11 to 17 and Section 62.
• Section 12 defines a condition as a stipulation essential to the main purpose of the contract,
the breach of which gives the aggrieved party the right to treat the contract as repudiated.
• Section 13 states that when a contract of sale is subject to any condition, the breach of that
condition gives the injured party the right to reject the goods or treat the contract as
repudiated.
• Section 14 provides guidelines for determining whether a term is a condition or a warranty. It
states that a stipulation may be a condition, even if it is called a warranty in the contract,
depending on the importance attached to it by the parties.
• Section 15 empowers the injured party to waive or elect to treat a breach of condition as a
breach of warranty
CONTINUED:- Application
of Sections
11 to 17
Warranties (Sections 12 to 15): (Section
• Section 12 defines a warranty as a 62):Section
stipulation collateral to the main purpose of 62 clarifies
the contract, the breach of which gives rise to that
a claim for damages but not the right to reject Sections 11
the goods and treat the contract as to 17 of the
repudiated. Sale of
Goods Act,
• Section 13 states that when a contract of 1930, apply
sale is subject to any warranty, the breach of to
that warranty only gives the injured party a contracts for
right to claim damages. the sale of
goods only
• Section 14 provides guidelines for and not to
determining whether a term is a condition or a any other
warranty. It states that a stipulation may be a contracts.
warranty, even if it is called a condition in the
contract, depending on the importance
attached to it by the parties.
CONTINUED:-
• In summary, conditions and warranties play a crucial role in
contracts of sale. Conditions are essential stipulations, the breach of
which allows the injured party to treat the contract as repudiated,
• while warranties are collateral stipulations that give rise to a claim
for damages but not the right to reject the goods.
• The Act also provides for implied conditions and warranties, as well
as specific provisions for sale by description and sale by sample. It's
important to understand these provisions when entering into a
contract of sale to protect the rights an interests of the parties
involved.
CONTINUED:-
• Breach of Conditions: When a condition in a contract of sale is
breached, the aggrieved party has the following rights:
• Right to Repudiate the Contract: The aggrieved party can treat the
contract as repudiated, which means they can consider the contract
terminated and claim damages for any losses suffered.
• Right to Sue for Damages: The aggrieved party can sue the party in
breach for damages, seeking compensation for any loss or harm
caused due to the breach.
• Right to Refuse Goods: The aggrieved party can reject the goods if
they have not accepted them or have discovered the breach before
acceptance.
CONTINUED:-
• Breach of Warranties: When a warranty in a contract of sale is breached,
the aggrieved party has the following rights:
• Right to Sue for Damages: The aggrieved party can sue the party in
breach for damages, seeking compensation for any loss or harm caused
due to the breach. However, they do not have the right to repudiate the
contract or reject the goods.
• When a Condition is to be Treated as a Warranty: Section 13 of the Sale
of Goods Act, 1930 provides guidance on when a condition is treated as a
warranty. It states that when a contract of sale is subject to a condition,
but the condition is not essential to the main purpose of the contract,
and the breach of the condition can be compensated by damages, then
the condition can be treated as a warranty.
• In such cases, the aggrieved party cannot repudiate the contract but can
claim damages for the breach.
13
• Section 27 - Sale by a Non-owner: This section states that when goods are sold by a
person who is not the owner of the goods, and the buyer is not aware of the seller's
lack of ownership, the buyer acquires a good title to the goods, provided they
purchase them in good faith and without notice of any defect in the seller's title.
• Section 28 - Sale by One of Joint Owners: When there are multiple joint owners of
goods, and one of them has sole possession of the goods with the permission of the
co-owners, the property (ownership) in the goods is transferred to any person who
buys the goods from that joint owner in good faith and without notice of the seller's
lack of authority to sell. In such cases, the buyer acquires a good title to the goods.
14
CONTINUED:-
• Section 29 - Sale by Person in Possession under Voidable Contract: If the seller of goods has obtained
possession of the goods under a contract that is voidable under Section 19 or Section 19A of the Indian
Contract Act, 1872, but the contract has not been rescinded at the time of the sale, the buyer acquires a
good title to the goods if they purchase them in good faith and without notice of any defect in the
seller's title.
• Section 30 - Seller or Buyer in Possession after Sale: This section applies to situations where a person
who has sold goods or agreed to buy goods continues to be in possession of the goods or the documents
of title to the goods.
In such cases:
• If the seller, or a mercantile agent acting on their behalf, delivers or transfers the goods or documents
of title to the goods to another person in good faith and without notice of any previous sale, pledge, or
other disposition, the delivery or transfer is considered valid.
• If the buyer, with the consent of the seller, obtains possession of the goods or the documents of title to
the goods and subsequently delivers or transfers them to another person in good faith and without
notice of any lien or other right of the original seller, the delivery or transfer is considered valid.
15
CONTINUED:-
• These sections aim to protect the interests of buyers who purchase goods in
good faith and without notice of any defects or lack of authority of the seller.
They provide guidelines regarding the transfer of title in specific
circumstances, ensuring that innocent buyers obtain a good title to the goods,
even if there are issues with the seller's ownership or authority to sell.
• These provisions govern the transfer of title in various situations, ensuring that
a buyer who purchases goods in good faith and without notice of any defect in
the seller's title obtains a good title to the goods.
• However, it's important to note that these provisions are subject to other
applicable laws and legal principles, such as those related to fraud, theft, or
the rights of true owners. Therefore, it is advisable for buyers to exercise due
diligence and obtain appropriate legal advice to ensure the validity of the title
when entering into a contract of sale
4. RIGHTS OF BUYERS 16
Example: A sells his bike to B for Rs. 60,000 and receives a cheque for the price. Till this time
seller will only be called as seller. But when subsequently, the cheque is dishonored due to
insufficiency of funds in B’s bank account, then only A becomes an unpaid seller.
17
CONTINUED:-
Rights (Remedies) of Unpaid Seller:-
(The unpaid seller has the rights/ remedies against goods and buyer both)
Rights of unpaid seller against goods Rights of unpaid seller against buyer
1.Right of possession/ lien
2. Suit for price
3.Right of stoppage of goods in transit
4.Suit for interest and special damages
5.Right of resale
6.Suit for damages for nonacceptance
7.Suit for breach of contract
18
CONTINUED:-
3.Right of resale
The unpaid seller has the right to resell the goods.
Conditions for resale:
• When goods are of perishable nature- Then unpaid seller can resell them
immediately without the notice to the buyer. But in case of non-perishable
items unpaid seller needs to send notice to the buyer for reselling them.
• Where unpaid seller gives the notice to buyer and buyer still don’t pay for it
• Where the right of resale is reserved/ mentioned in the contract .If contract
clearly specifies that reselling can’t be done or vice versa.
• Buyer becomes insolvent.
• Buyer fails to pay the price of the goods.
20
CONTINUED:-
5.CAVEAT EMPTOR:-
✓ The doctrine of Caveat Emptor is an integral part of the Sale of Goods Act. It translates to “let the buyer beware”.
This means it lays the responsibility of their choice on the buyer themselves.
✓ It is specifically defined in Section 16 of the act “there is no implied warranty or condition as to the quality or the
fitness for any particular purpose of goods supplied under such a contract of sale“
✓ A seller makes his goods available in the open market. The buyer previews all his options and then accordingly makes
his choice. Now let’s assume that the product turns out to be defective or of inferior quality.
✓ This doctrine says that the seller will not be responsible for this. The buyer himself is responsible for the choice he
made.
However, the buyer can shift the responsibility to the seller if the three following conditions are fulfilled.
• if the buyer shares with the seller his purpose for the purchase
• the buyer relies on the knowledge and/or technical expertise of the seller
• and the seller sells such goods.
22
CONTINUED:-
Exceptions to the Doctrine of Caveat Emptor:-
CONTINUED:-
4. Goods of Merchantable Quality:-
Section 16 (2) deals with the exception of merchantable quality. The sections state that the
seller who is selling goods by description has a duty of providing goods of merchantable
quality, i.e. capable of passing the market standards.
5. Sale by Sample:-
If the buyer buys his goods after examining a sample, then the rule of Doctrine of Caveat
Emptor will not apply. If the rest of the goods do not resemble the sample, the buyer cannot
be held responsible. In this case, the seller will be the one responsible.
CASE LAWS:- 24