The lead negotiator in a hostage-taking incident is responsible for establishing communication, building rapport with the hostage-taker, and working towards a peaceful resolution. The COACH provides guidance and support to the negotiator by offering tactical advice and emotional support during the crisis. It is recommended that the ground commander avoids direct negotiation to maintain command structure and prevent potential escalation of the situation.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views2 pages
HBV Activity
The lead negotiator in a hostage-taking incident is responsible for establishing communication, building rapport with the hostage-taker, and working towards a peaceful resolution. The COACH provides guidance and support to the negotiator by offering tactical advice and emotional support during the crisis. It is recommended that the ground commander avoids direct negotiation to maintain command structure and prevent potential escalation of the situation.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
ACTIVITY 1
1. In a hostage-taking incident, what are the
primary roles and responsibilities of the lead negotiator in resolving the crisis? 2. What specific guidance and support does the COACH provide to the primary negotiator during a crisis situation? 3. Why is it generally recommended that the ground commander avoids direct negotiation with the hostage-taker in a crisis situation?