Scribd
Upload
5 views41 pages

Session 5B. Monitoring and Evaluation Planning

The document outlines the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) planning for school-based professional development (PD) programs, emphasizing adherence to quality standards and the use of the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model. It details the evaluation levels, including participant reactions, learning outcomes, behavior changes, and overall impact, along with the responsibilities of various stakeholders in the M&E process. Additionally, it specifies the components of the M&E plan and the requirements for the Program Completion Report to ensure effective implementation and assessment of PD initiatives.

Uploaded by

Ma. Luna Belleza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views41 pages

Session 5B. Monitoring and Evaluation Planning

The document outlines the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) planning for school-based professional development (PD) programs, emphasizing adherence to quality standards and the use of the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model. It details the evaluation levels, including participant reactions, learning outcomes, behavior changes, and overall impact, along with the responsibilities of various stakeholders in the M&E process. Additionally, it specifies the components of the M&E plan and the requirements for the Program Completion Report to ensure effective implementation and assessment of PD initiatives.

Uploaded by

Ma. Luna Belleza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 41

SESSION 5B

MONITORING AND
EVALUATION PLANNING
TRAINING PROGRAM ON THE
DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, &
QUALITY ASSURANCE
OF PD PROGRAMS

Palmas del Mar Resorts, Bacolod City,


February 17-25, 2025
Session 3
Introduction to
Professional Development

SESSION Planning

ROADMA
P Workshop
• Review of PD Needs
1BAssessment Results;
• Mapping to the existing
PD Programs

Session
NEAP Core Programs
2 Workshop 1A
Inventory of RO and SDO-
Session 1 developed PD Programs
Professional
Development Priorities
SESSION
ROADMAP Session 5A Session 5B
Planning & Designing Monitoring & Evaluation
School-based INSET Planning

Session 4
Process of Fund
Utilization
Workshop
Professional Development
2
Planning
Sarah Jane C.
Atienza
Senior Education Program
NEAP - Quality Assurance Unit
Specialist
SESSION
ROADMA Workshop 4
Review & Evaluation of
Proposed PD and School-based

P INSET Plan

Workshop
Revision of PD Plan and
5
School-based INSET Plan

Session 6
Quality Assurance Process &
PRC Accreditation

Workshop
INSET Planning
3
Understand the M&E processes for
01
school-based PD programs.

SESSION Identify the different components of


M&E Plan and Program Completion
02
OBJECTIVE Report.

S
ALL school-based professional development
programs (LAC and INSET) shall be monitored
and evaluated to ensure they are properly
implemented and they are effective.
MONITORING
MONITORING
School-based PD Programs shall be monitored by
the RO/SDO/School Heads to ensure PD program’s
adherence to the quality-assured PD Program
proposal and compliance with the PD Program
Delivery Standards and Indicators listed in PD
Compliance Monitoring Tool.
M&E Tool: PD Compliance Monitoring Tool
MONITORING
The Human Resource Development Division/NEAP-R
and School Governance and Operations Division –
Schools Management Monitoring and Evaluation
(SMME) section, shall facilitate the monitoring of
the school-Based PD Programs consistent with the
quality-assured M&E plan.
EVALUATION
The evaluation for the school-based professional development
adapts the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model.

Level 4 - Results

KIRKPATRIC Level 3 - Behavior


K Level 2 - Learning

EVALUATION
MODEL
Level 1 - Reaction
KIRKPATRICK EVALUATION
MODELResults Did the training influence performance?

Behavior Did the training change behavior?

Learning Did learning transfer occur?

Reaction Did the learners enjoy


the training?
LEVEL 1 - REACTION
School-based Program shall be able to capture
participants’ daily reaction towards the delivery of the
program through the End-of-Day Evaluation.
School-based Program shall be able to capture
participants’ daily reaction towards the delivery of the
program through the End-of-Day Evaluation.
LEVEL 2 - LEARNING
The Program Management Team shall administer various
forms of assessment to check the learning of the
participants.

Assessment shall be included in the Program proposal


submitted for quality assurance.
LEVEL 3 - BEHAVIOR
The Learning Action Plan (LAP) shall be the final output in
all
school-based PD programs to measure whether
participants were truly impacted by the learning and if
they’re applying what they have learned. RO/SDO/School
Heads shall monitor.

The LAP Implementation of the participants in accordance


with the M&E Plan (Level 3 Evaluation) of the PD Program.
The immediate supervisor of the teacher participant shall
monitor and ensure that the LAP is implemented within the
prescribed timeline and provide technical assistance if
LEVEL 4 - IMPACT
After the PD Program has been completed and begin to
apply what they have learned through their LAP, an
impact assessment shall be conducted per governance
level.
EVALUATION

EVALUATION WHAT TO HOW TO PERSON


LEVEL MEASURE MEASURE RESPONSIBLE

Level 1 - • Reaction of the • End-of-Day


• PMT
participants Evaluation
Reaction
EVALUATION

EVALUATION WHAT TO HOW TO PERSON


LEVEL MEASURE MEASURE RESPONSIBLE

• Various
assessment
• Learning gained
Level 2 - tools included in
of the • PMT
the quality-
Learning participants
assured PD
proposal
EVALUATION

EVALUATION WHAT TO HOW TO PERSON


LEVEL MEASURE MEASURE RESPONSIBLE

• Learning
Level 3 - • Application of
Application Plan • School Head
Learning
Behavior (LAP)
EVALUATION

EVALUATION WHAT TO HOW TO PERSON


LEVEL MEASURE MEASURE RESPONSIBLE

• TBD per
Level 4 - • Impact of the PD • All governance
governance
program level
Impact level
M&E PLAN
M&E PLAN
Follows the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model
Follows the
Kirkpatrick COMPONENTS
Evaluation Model
OF M&E PLAN
COMPONENTS OF M&E
PLAN

What will be measured?


COMPONENTS OF M&E
PLAN

What methods/tools will be used to collect data?


COMPONENTS OF M&E
PLAN

Who and/or what documents will provide data or


evidence on the indicators?
COMPONENTS OF M&E
PLAN

When will M&E activities be


undertaken?
COMPONENTS OF M&E
PLAN

Who will be accountable for ensuring that M&E


activities are done?
COMPONENTS OF M&E
PLAN

What resources are needed to implement M&E


activities?
COMPONENTS OF M&E
PLAN

Who will use the data gathered?


PROGRAM
COMPLETION
REPORT
PROGRAM
COMPLETIO
N
REPORT
The School Head together with the Program
Management Team shall prepare and submit the
accomplished Program Completion Report to the
Schools Division Office 10 working days after the
conduct of the program.
COMPONENTS OF PCR

Executive
Summary
• Program Description
• Objectives
• Daily Proceedings of the
Conduct of the Program
COMPONENTS OF PCR

M&E Analysis

• Summary of Level 1:
Participants’ Reaction and
Level 2: Participants’
Learning results
COMPONENTS OF PCR

General Comments
and Issues
Encountered
COMPONENTS OF PCR

Recommendations
• Suggested program
improvements and
policy action
COMPONENTS OF PCR

Actual
Participants
Profile
“An intervention cannot
be called an intervention
if it is not progress
monitored. An
intervention without
progress monitoring is
just an activity. “
THANK YOU

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy