Dissertation Presentation: BY:-Chanchal M.SC Nursing 2 YR
Dissertation Presentation: BY:-Chanchal M.SC Nursing 2 YR
PRESENTATION
BY: -
CHANCHAL
M.Sc Nursing 2nd YR
INDEX
• INTRODUCTION
• STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
• OBJECTIVES
• RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
• OBSERVATION AND RESULTS
• DISCUSSION
• SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
• RECOMENDATION
• LIMITATION
Introduction
1 Demographic variables 8
3 Anthropometric Measurement 6
RESULT OF THE STUDY
Demographic characteristics of study subjects
28% 30%
13-14 yrs
15-16 yrs
17-18 yrs
42%
distribution of students according to class wise
20%
26%
9th
10th
11th
12th
19%
34%
Distribution of students as per Father's Education
3.50%
11%
13%
illiterate
5th
23% 8th
10th
12th
graduate
23%
22.50%
Distribution of sample according to
education of mother
1%
4.50%
13%
25%
illiterate
5th
8th
10th
12th
graduate
18.50%
38.50%
distribution of study subjects as per Father's Occu-
pation
37.50%
0.375 34.50%
0.325
0.275
0.225
Axis Title
0.175
12.00%
0.125
9.00%
7.00%
0.075
0.025
80.00% 71.50%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
23.50%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
percentage
nuclear joint
Distribution of study subjects as per family belongs
to BPL
12%
yes
no
total
51%
37%
i) Dietary Pattern
1 Yes 76 38%
2 No 124 62%
2 No 16 8%
2 No 3 1.50%
2 No 15 7.50%
1 2 meals 70 35%
1 Yes 42 21%
2 No 158 79%
2 No 71 35.50%
1 Yes 13 6.50%
2 No 189 94.50%
60% 50.50%
46%
50%
40%
percentage
30%
20%
3.50%
0%
10%
0%
UW normal OW obese
Finding of BMI
3 25 – 30 (overweight) 7 3.50%
4 Above 30 (obese) 0 0%
60%
53.50%
50%
40%
percentage
30%
25.00%
20%
11.50%
10%
10%
0%
above 11 9 to 11 7 to 9 below 7
Finding of anemia
mean SD mean SD
Result details
Objective No. 1
Among 200 study subjects, 50.50% subjects
were normal, 46% subjects were underweight,
3.50% were overweight category according to
WHO. No one was in obese category i.e. 50.50%
were normal and rest were malnourished.
Among 200 study subjects, 10% subjects were
normal, 53.50% subjects were mild, 25% were
moderate and 11.50% were in sever category
according to WHO i.e. only 10% were in non-
anemic sample rest were anemic.
Contd…….
Objective No. 2
Association between 7 demographic variables, 9 dietary habit
and physical activity questions were seen with BMI in which
level of significance was seen at 5%, in which it was
significant with age, family belong to BPL, regular fast food
intake and fruits and vegetable consumption.
The mean value of BMI and anemia was 19.0415 & 9.2475
and SD was 3.0632 & 1.8342 respectively.
50.50% were normal and rest were malnourished.
10% were in non- anemic sample rest were anemic.
With BMI, it was significant with age, family belong to
BPL, regular fast food intake and fruits and vegetable
consumption and rest were not significant.
With anemia, it was significant with age, type of family and
meals per day and rest were not significant.
2 15 - 16 87 36 48 3 0
3 17 - 18 53 16 35 2 0
i) Education of Father
3 8th 44 21 21 1 0
4 10th 56 21 34 2 0
5 12th 26 10 15 1 0
6 Graduatio 7 2 4 1 0
n
Total 200 92 101 7 0
i) Education of Mother
3 8th 37 11 23 3 0
4 10th 26 13 10 3 0
5 12th 9 5 4 0 0
6 Graduatio 1 0 1 0 0
n
Total 200 92 101 7 0
3 Private 24 10 13 1 0
Job
4 Govt. Job 14 5 8 1 0
5 Other 18 8 9 1 0
i) Type of family
i) Dietary Pattern
i) Regular exercise
i) Age
1 13 – 14 60 (30%) 8 (4%) 25 (12.5%) 17 10 (5%) 23.99 6 0.000 Signifi
(8.5%) 52 cant
2 15 – 16 87 (43.5%) 7 (3.5%) 58 (29%) 10 (5%) 11
(5.5%)
3 17 – 18 53 (26.60%) 5 (2.5%) 24 (12%) 23 2 (1%)
(11.5%)
Total 200 (100%) 20 (10%) 107 (53.5%) 50 (25%) 23
(11%)
i) Education of Father
1 Illiterate 22 (11%) 1 (0.5%) 12 (6%) 8 (4%) 1 (0.5%) 17.23 15 0.305 Not
5 0 Signifi
2 5th 45 (22.5%) 6 (3%) 19 (8.5%) 14 (7%) 6 (3%) cant
1 Yes 185 (92.5%) 17 (8.5%) 98 (46%) 48 (24%) 22 (11%) 2.962 3 0.397 Not
5 Signifi
2 No 15 (7.5%) 3 (1.5%) 9 (4.5%) 2 (1%) 1 (0.5%) cant