27 February 2007

• 18:2318:23, 27 February 2007 diff hist +23‎ User talk:Ilena Before I am hung as well as tarred and feathered by Stephen Barrett family & teammates ... hiding their own WP:COI behind multiple user names and aliases ... while attacking me */
• 18:2218:22, 27 February 2007 diff hist +97‎ User talk:Ilena All is not as it seems ... please keep investigating the true Barrett WP:COI here thank you
• 18:1618:16, 27 February 2007 diff hist +8,141‎ User talk:Ilena No edit summary
• 01:2601:26, 27 February 2007 diff hist +599‎ User talk:Ilena Unfair block ...
• 01:1501:15, 27 February 2007 diff hist +322‎ Talk:Daniel J. Barrett What is the hurry ... why bury the facts about who Daniel and Stephen Barrett and their operations are ... while he promotes himself on Wiki on this commercial article about himself by himself
• 01:0801:08, 27 February 2007 diff hist +115‎ User talk:Ilena Created my first subpage due to Ron Z's help ... thank you!
• 01:0601:06, 27 February 2007 diff hist −34‎ User:Ilena No edit summary
• 01:0101:01, 27 February 2007 diff hist +34‎ User:Ilena adding (subpage I think)
• 00:4900:49, 27 February 2007 diff hist +519‎ Talk:Daniel J. Barrett Please do not archive this discussion Ronz... I strongly object ... there is relevant information here by you and AvB that relates to Arb ... thank you so much.
• 00:3900:39, 27 February 2007 diff hist +429‎ Talk:Daniel J. Barrett No Wiki page is an island ... I believe your comments on the Arb of Barrett vs Rosenthal are very relevant and connected.
• 00:0600:06, 27 February 2007 diff hist +633‎ Talk:Daniel J. Barrett I respectfully disagree ... commercial site promoted by owner ... nothing more

26 February 2007

• 23:4923:49, 26 February 2007 diff hist +432‎ Talk:Daniel J. Barrett Commerical site made by author about author promoting author
• 23:2923:29, 26 February 2007 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Daniel J. Barrett I don't believe Daniel knew that creating vanity sites such as this was against Wiki rules ... he is very computer savvy and has lots of internet experience
• 23:2823:28, 26 February 2007 diff hist −55‎ Talk:Daniel J. Barrett Daniel Barrett works for Stephen Barrett
• 23:2723:27, 26 February 2007 diff hist −2‎ Talk:Daniel J. Barrett →Another Daniel J Barrett Commercial Site it appears
• 23:2023:20, 26 February 2007 diff hist +79‎ m Talk:Daniel J. Barrett →Another Daniel J Barrett Commercial Site it appears
• 23:1823:18, 26 February 2007 diff hist +132‎ Talk:Daniel J. Barrett This appears to be yet another of many commercial sites of Daniel J Barrett's
• 23:1523:15, 26 February 2007 diff hist +1,526‎ Talk:Daniel J. Barrett One of Daniel J Barrett's professional commerical business promotions
• 20:4820:48, 26 February 2007 diff hist +269‎ User:Hipal/notes How do I create a separate user page like Ron Z has?
• 20:4420:44, 26 February 2007 diff hist +1,285‎ User:Hipal/notes I thought this was Wiki ... I have Ronz and Fyslee's comments all over my pages .. I think calling my reply 'vandalism' is a typical PR trick to give excuse to remove factual data
• 00:1600:16, 26 February 2007 diff hist +254‎ Talk:Harassment SLAPP suits are classic harassment suits ... oft Industry Vs Activist such as in this case

25 February 2007

• 23:4923:49, 25 February 2007 diff hist +713‎ User talk:Ilena How is this for AGF?
• 23:3623:36, 25 February 2007 diff hist +139‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard Fyslee advertises Barrett's operations on Wiki, blogs, Chirotalk, Healthfraud List ... defines publicist
• 23:3223:32, 25 February 2007 diff hist +1,310‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard Fyslee is Barrett's publicist
• 23:2723:27, 25 February 2007 diff hist +2,285‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard Barrrett Vs Rosenthal ... Fyslee calls himself the plaintiff .. I agree he represents the plaintiff, Stephen Barrett
• 13:1913:19, 25 February 2007 diff hist −7‎ Harassment Legal harassment ... SLAPP suits

24 February 2007

• 22:5522:55, 24 February 2007 diff hist +532‎ User talk:SMcCandlish Thanks ... what about this one on Godwin?
• 17:4517:45, 24 February 2007 diff hist +318‎ User talk:SMcCandlish Was revert here appropriate?
• 00:5400:54, 24 February 2007 diff hist +390‎ Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal/Workshop Who told Geni that NCAHF licence was expired it was not suspended????
• 00:2800:28, 24 February 2007 diff hist −86‎ User talk:Ilena Working on a "Ronz archive" ... illustrating his deceptive accusations and consolidating my comments

23 February 2007

• 22:3122:31, 23 February 2007 diff hist −621‎ User talk:Ilena Removing Ron's attacks from my page ... he removes every word I write on his ... so I will keep on my talk page my undistracted comments
• 22:3022:30, 23 February 2007 diff hist −255‎ User talk:Ilena Equal Equal ... Ronz eliminates my comments from his page ... I will put them here ... He continues to censor me
• 22:0822:08, 23 February 2007 diff hist −397‎ User talk:Ilena Ronz has removed my comments from his talk page again so I will put my comments here ...
• 21:4921:49, 23 February 2007 diff hist +2‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal/Workshop Does this belong in an encyclopedia ... a quote from someone in litigation with someone in the article???
• 21:4221:42, 23 February 2007 diff hist +1,768‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal/Workshop ''"avoiding both the school and its alumni."''' Is this encyclopedic coming from Barrett, and Fyslee (both litigants with Dr. Clark, despite Fyslee's denials)
• 21:3121:31, 23 February 2007 diff hist 0‎ m Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal/Workshop wikilinking
• 21:3021:30, 23 February 2007 diff hist +29‎ m Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal/Workshop wikilinking
• 21:2721:27, 23 February 2007 diff hist +1‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal/Workshop Is this really [WP:CIVIL] and [WP:AGF] as Durova claims?
• 21:2221:22, 23 February 2007 diff hist +2,250‎ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal/Workshop I have never for a heartbeat hidden my identity nor used sock or meat puppets ... you are attacking something I have not done, Durova
• 21:1921:19, 23 February 2007 diff hist +273‎ Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal/Workshop Just say the word
• 21:1221:12, 23 February 2007 diff hist +2,438‎ User talk:Hipal Reinstating Ronz's false and unsupported accusation with diffs
• 21:1021:10, 23 February 2007 diff hist 0‎ User talk:Ilena Where do I say that ''Ronz is Stephen Barrett''????
• 21:0921:09, 23 February 2007 diff hist +1,285‎ User talk:Ilena Where do I say that ''Ronz is Stephen Barrett''????
• 21:0821:08, 23 February 2007 diff hist +1,285‎ User:Hipal/notes Where do I say that ''Ronz is Stephen Barrett''????
• 19:0419:04, 23 February 2007 diff hist +257‎ Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal/Workshop Barrett vs Rosenthal it is
• 18:2018:20, 23 February 2007 diff hist +6‎ Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal/Workshop Shot and others with strong Barrett POV worked collaboratively to keep factual & negative info on Barrett off of Wiki
• 18:1918:19, 23 February 2007 diff hist +26‎ Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal/Workshop This user account seems to be single purpose to protect Barrett's operations
• 18:1618:16, 23 February 2007 diff hist +3,568‎ Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal/Workshop I'm feeling lack of neutrality here ... I hope I'm mistaken
• 17:1417:14, 23 February 2007 diff hist +1,155‎ User talk:Ilena Ronz has no valid response so he censors my valid question
• 17:1217:12, 23 February 2007 diff hist +1,153‎ User talk:Hipal I will take your speedy removal of my valid and honest honest to be an admission that you made up your accusation and it was meant as distraction and attack.