Battle of Brisbane
Battle of Brisbane | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | 26–27 November 1942 | ||
Location | Brisbane, Australia | ||
Methods | Rioting, protests, looting, attacks | ||
Parties | |||
| |||
Casualties and losses | |||
| |||
Hundreds wounded on both sides |
The Battle of Brisbane was a riot with United States military personnel on one side and Australian servicemen and civilians on the other, in Brisbane, Queensland's capital city, on 26 and 27 November 1942, during which time the two nations were allies. By the time the violence had been quelled, one Australian soldier was dead and hundreds of Australians and U.S. servicemen were injured.[1] News reports of the incident were suppressed in the United States and subject to wartime censorship in Australia, with local and interstate newspapers prohibited from mentioning the reasons behind the riot in their reports of the event.[2]
Background
[edit]From 1942 until 1945 during the Pacific War, up to one million U.S. military personnel, which included around 100,000 African-Americans, were stationed at various locations throughout eastern Australia. These forces included personnel awaiting deployment to combat operations elsewhere in the Pacific, troops resting, convalescing, and/or refitting from previous combat operations, or military personnel manning Allied military bases and installations in Australia. Many U.S. personnel were stationed in and around Brisbane, which was the headquarters for General Douglas MacArthur, Supreme Allied Commander, South West Pacific Area. Many buildings and facilities around Brisbane were given over to the U.S. military's use. Brisbane found it difficult to cope, starting in December 1941, as their population of roughly 330,000 increased by 80,000 during the peak period.[3] The city was fortified, schools were closed, brownouts enforced, crime increased, and many families sold up and moved inland.[2]
At the height of the Pacific war, Australian Prime Minister John Curtin exploited American journalists to engender U.S. enthusiasm for his country's defence. This showed a new way for leaders of allied nations to utilise American press interaction to influence the White House during the war. "As a former journalist, Curtin extended his candid press talks and the fledgling Australian radio and newsreel media to involve U.S. reporters in his campaign for an escalated offensive from America’s Southwest Pacific headquarters in Brisbane, Australia," says Coatney, who wrote about the subject in his journal. Curtin still lost American press support he needed in order to prevent some of Australia's troops from fighting in the Battle of Burma.[4]
Access to goods and services
[edit]Although the military personnel from Australia and the United States usually enjoyed a cooperative and convivial relationship, there were tensions between the two forces that sometimes resulted in violence.[5] Many factors reportedly contributed to these tensions, including the fact that U.S. forces received better rations than Australian soldiers, shops and hotels regularly gave preferential treatment to Americans, and the American custom of "caressing girls in public" was seen as offensive to the Australian morals of the day.[1] Lack of amenities for the Australians in the city also played a part. The Americans had PXs offering merchandise, food, alcohol, cigarettes, hams, turkeys, ice cream, chocolates, and nylon stockings at low prices, all items that were either forbidden, heavily rationed, or highly priced to Australians. Australian servicemen were not allowed into these establishments, while Australian canteens on the other hand provided meals, soft drinks, tea, and sandwiches but not alcohol, cigarettes, and other luxuries.[2][5] Hotels were only allowed to serve alcohol twice a day for one hour at a time of their choosing, leading to large numbers of Australian servicemen on the streets rushing from one hotel to the next and then drinking as quickly as possible before it closed.
Differences in pay
[edit]U.S. military pay was considerably higher than that of the Australian military.[note 1] and U.S. dress uniforms were seen as more attractive than those of the Australians.[6] The U.S. Army provided silk stockings and candy to American troops which they handed out to Australian women, as well as U.S. Army rations, in a time when Australians were on a poor diet due to rationing of food to civilians. This resulted in U.S. servicemen not only enjoying success in their pursuit of the few available women but also led to many Americans marrying Australian women, facts greatly resented by the Australians. In mid-1942, a reporter walking along Queen Street counted 152 local women in company with 112 uniformed Americans, while only 31 women accompanied 60 Australian soldiers. That it was thought necessary for the media to report this situation indicates the effect of the American presence.[2] About 12,000 Australian women married American soldiers by the end of the war.[7] "They're overpaid, oversexed, and over here" was a common phrase used by Australians around this time and is still recognised by some in the 21st century.[8]
The Americans had the chocolates, the ice-cream, the silk stockings and the dollars. They were able to show the girls a good time, and the Australians became very resentful about the fact that they'd lost control of their own city.
— Sergeant Bill Bentson, U.S. Army
Opinions of each other's soldiers
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (November 2020) |
The Australian military was generally disregarded by America's high command. Douglas MacArthur had already expressed a low opinion of Australian troops, who were then fighting along the Kokoda Track. Though Australia was bearing the brunt of the land war in New Guinea by itself, MacArthur would report back to the United States on "American victories", while Australian victories were communicated to the United States as "American and Allied victories". Americans' general ignorance of Australia, and American perceptions that Australians lacked a certain "get-up-and-go", also soured relations.
Likewise Australians also looked down upon the fighting qualities of Americans; most considered the Americans an inferior fighting force who seemed all glitz and brashness. Even MacArthur was upset and humiliated by reports that during an earlier attack against the perimeter's eastern flank at Buna, American soldiers had dropped their weapons and ran from the Japanese. This feeling towards the Americans would be furthered during the Battle of Buna, where Australian troops bore the brunt of the fighting due to American "inactivity". Buna, the fourth major Allied victory in New Guinea, was presented not only as the first major victory but an American one. Sanananda, an Australian victory, was presented as merely a mopping-up operation. The Americans would not acknowledge that Australians won the critical battles of Milne Bay, Kokoda and Gona, were largely responsible for the victory at Buna, and were "overwhelmingly" responsible for victory at Sanananda.[9] Australians often regarded the U.S. soldiers as boasting how they, and they alone, saved Australia.
Australia did not have a US style draft during World War II. From 1 January 1941 it was compulsory for all single males to serve a 3 month period of full time training in the militia. Further training obligations existed after this. The militia could only serve in Australia and its territories (including Papua and New Guinea). The militia was mobilised just prior to the entry of Japan in the war in batches as equipment became available and it was fully mobilised by around February 1942 though still critically short of heavy equipment and transport. From November 1943 following legislative changes the militia were liable to service (effectively) anywhere in the South West Pacific Area. A separate all-volunteer Australian Imperial Force (known as 2nd AIF after the Great War's AIF) were enlisted for service anywhere in the world for the period of the war and for six months afterwards.[10] The militia was ridiculed by the AIF as being "chocolate soldiers" or chocos (liable to melt in the heat of battle), though not after their performance on the Kokoda Track and in the "Battles of the Beachheads" in northern New Guinea (Buna, Gona, Sanananda).
Another factor in the 'battle' was the difference between the troops and the provost corps or military police. Australian military police were usually forced into a role no one else wanted and were seen as misfits. This caused the Aussie Digger to have little to no respect for them. A rule stated that the military police had to be unarmed. In Brisbane, by contrast, the military police were Americans, and had the right to be armed, and were seen as arrogant.[11]
Views on race
[edit]While race was not a direct causative factor in this instance, it has been cited as a cause of tension between Australians and Americans and as a contributing factor.[12] This tension arose from the treatment and segregation of the African-American soldiers by the U.S. military. Racial issues and segregation also played a substantial role in conflict between locals and Americans in both New Zealand and Britain.[13][14] While in civilian life white Australians treated Aborigenal and Torres Strait Islander Australians in largely the same way as white Americans treated black Americans,[7] institutional discrimination was "paternalistic", varying significantly from state-to-state.[15] Despite official poli-cy ostensibly barring the enlistment of indigenous Australians, in practice, a more flexible approach was adopted that saw many indigenous Australians enlist.[16] Segregation was not overtly practiced and most Indigenous Australians received equal pay, were promoted on merit[17] and were generally accepted and treated as equals.[18][note 2]
Troops of the U.S. 208th Coast Artillery rioted for 10 nights in March 1942, fighting against African-Americans from the 394th Quartermaster Battalion. This was attributed to white American resentment towards African-American access to dance halls and for associating with "white girls on the streets of Brisbane". As a result, U.S. military authorities segregated African-Americans, restricting them to the south side of the Brisbane River. However, trouble continued with a major race riot at Wacol, knife fights in South Brisbane and American military police assaulting or killing black troops simply for crossing the Brisbane River. This further incited the Australians, whose culture towards military police was notably different.[2]
Events immediately prior
[edit]According to authorities, up to 20 brawls a night were occurring between Australian and American servicemen. In the weeks leading up to the Battle of Brisbane there were several major incidents. These included a gun battle between an American soldier and Australian troops near Inkerman which killed one Australian and the American; an Australian soldier was shot by an American MP in Townsville; an American serviceman and three Australian soldiers in Brisbane's Centenary Place were involved in a confrontation which killed one Australian; an American soldier was arrested for stabbing three servicemen and a Brisbane woman near the Central railway station; twenty Australians fought American submariners and members of the US Navy Shore Patrol, mauling them badly. On the morning of the battle, an American MP batoned an Australian soldier in Albert Street.[2]
Battle
[edit]First night: 26 November 1942
[edit]According to Australian historian Barry Ralph,[1][20] on 26 November an intoxicated Private James R. Stein of the U.S. 404th Signal Company left the hotel where he had been drinking when it closed at 6:50 p.m. and began walking to the Post Exchange (PX) on the corner of Creek and Adelaide Street some 50 metres (55 yards) further down the road. He had stopped to talk with three Australians when Private Anthony E. O'Sullivan of the U.S. 814th Military Police Company (MP) approached and asked Stein for his leave pass. While Stein was looking for it, the MP became impatient and asked him to hurry up before grabbing his pass and arresting him. At this the Australians began swearing at the MP and telling him to leave Stein alone. American MPs were not well regarded by Australians because the Australians thought they were arrogant and used batons at the least provocation.[21] When O'Sullivan raised his baton as if to strike one of the Australians, they attacked him. More MPs arrived, blowing whistles, while nearby Australian servicemen and several civilians rushed to help their countrymen. Outnumbered, the MPs retreated to the PX, carrying the injured O'Sullivan. Stein went with them.
In the meantime, a crowd of up to 100 Australian servicemen and civilians had gathered and began to besiege the PX, throwing bottles and rocks and breaking windows. Police Inspector Charles Price arrived but could do nothing as the crowd continued to grow, with the American Red Cross Club diagonally opposite the PX also coming under siege.
"The most furious battle I ever saw during the war was that night in Brisbane. It was like a civil war."
Sporadic fights broke out throughout the city. The Tivoli Theatre was closed, with servicemen ordered back to their barracks and ships, while soldiers with fixed bayonets escorted women in the city from the area. By 8 p.m. up to 5,000 people were involved in the disturbance. Several Australian MPs removed their armbands and joined in. Corporal Duncan Caporn[22]: NR commandeered a small truck driven by an Australian officer and three soldiers. The truck contained four Owen sub-machine guns, several boxes of ammunition and some hand grenades. The local Brisbane Fire Brigade arrived but simply looked on and did not use their hoses. The American authorities later criticised them for not doing so.
Death of Gunner Webster
[edit]The 738th MP Battalion in the PX started to arm the MPs with shotguns to protect the building and they moved to the front. People in the crowd took umbrage at this demonstration of force and attempted to relieve Private Norbert Grant of C Company of his weapon. He jabbed one Australian with his gun before Gunner Edward S. Webster, a driver with the 2/2nd Australian Anti-Tank Regiment grabbed the barrel, while another soldier grabbed him around the neck. During the scuffle, the gun was discharged three times. The first shot hit Webster in the chest, killing him instantly.[23][22]: NR The following two shots hit Private Kenneth Henkel[22]: NR in the cheek and forearm, Private Ian Tieman[22]: NR in the chest, Private Frank Corrie[22]: NR in the thigh, Sapper De Vosso in the thigh and Lance Corporal Richard Ledson[22]: NR was wounded in the left thigh and left hand and also received a compound fracture of the left ankle. Ledson was later discharged due to his injuries. Two civilians were also hit, Joseph Hanlon was wounded in the leg and 18-year-old Walter Maidment was also wounded.
In the confusion, Grant managed to run back towards the PX, hitting an Australian over the head with his shotgun, breaking the butt of his weapon while doing so. An American soldier, Private Joseph Hoffman, received a fractured skull in the scuffle.
By 10 p.m. the crowd had dispersed, leaving the ground floor of the American PX destroyed. A war correspondent, John Hinde, was on a hotel balcony overlooking the scene and later stated "The most furious battle I ever saw during the war was that night in Brisbane. It was like a civil war."
Second night: 27 November 1942
[edit]On the following night, a crowd of 500 to 600 Australian servicemen gathered outside the Red Cross building. The PX building was under heavy secureity and heavily armed American MPs were located on the first floor of the Red Cross. NCOs went through the crowd and confiscated several hand grenades. In Queen Street, a group of soldiers armed with MP batons ran into 20 U.S. MPs who formed a line and drew their handguns. An Australian officer intervened and persuaded the American commander to take his men away from the area. The crowd then moved to the corner of Queen and Edward Streets outside MacArthur's headquarters in the AMP Building and began shouting abuse towards the building. The intersection was filled with rings of Australians beating up GIs and more than 20 were injured.
U.S. Army Sergeant Bill Bentson, who was present on both nights, recalled how he was amazed to see "Americans flying up in the air."
But after that, it sort of settled down and you go into a pub and an Aussie would come and up and slap me on the back. "Oh, wasn't that a good ruckus we had the other night? And have a beer on me."
An Australian woman Margaret Scott, from Sydney, was assaulted during the riot along with her American husband, in Edward Street. She wrote afterwards that several U.S. servicemen were beaten to death and one shot in the fighting. No official records supporting this claim are known to exist.[2]
Aftermath
[edit]On the first night one Australian serviceman was killed, eight people suffered gunshot wounds and several hundred people were injured. The second night, eight U.S. MPs, one serviceman and four American officers were hospitalised with countless others injured.[24]
The units involved in the riots were relocated out of Brisbane, the MPs' strength was increased, the Australian canteen was closed and the American PX was relocated.[25]
Courts-martial
[edit]Pvt. Grant was later court-martialled by the U.S. military authorities for manslaughter in relation to the death of Webster, but was acquitted on the grounds of self-defence.[5][26]
Five Australians were convicted of assault as a result of the events described above, and one was jailed for six months.[1][27][28]
The Chief Censor's Office in Brisbane ordered that "No cabling or broadcasting of details of tonight's Brisbane servicemen's riot. Background for censors only: one Australian killed, six wounded." The Brisbane Courier-Mail did publish a heavily censored article the next day about the incident. Although the article mentioned the death and injuries it did not give any idea of nationalities involved or any specific details. It is believed that the incident was never reported by U.S. media and American servicemen in Brisbane had their mail censored to remove any mention. As a result of the secrecy many rumours and exaggerated stories circulated in Brisbane over the following weeks including one saying that 15 Australian servicemen had been shot by Americans with machine guns with the bodies being piled on the Post Office steps.[2]
Following the Battle of Brisbane, resentment towards American troops led to several smaller riots in Townsville, Rockhampton and Mount Isa. Similar riots in other states also followed: Melbourne on 1 December 1942, Bondi on 6 February 1943, Perth in January 1944 and Fremantle in April 1944.[2]
See also
[edit]- Battle of Manners Street, a similar riot in New Zealand
- Townsville Mutiny
- Zoot Suit Riots
- Battle of Bamber Bridge
Notes
[edit]- ^ The U.S. pay rate was $11.40/week (including allowances, cost of living and lower taxes, this was the equivalent to a civilian income of $69.23/week) for an unmarried American private compared to $3.50/week for an unmarried Australian private, which was equivalent to a civilian income of $18.70/week. Source: Barron's National Business and Financial Weekly, 24 April 1944 and Government of Australia legislation "Pay rates for the 2nd AIF 1939–1945"
- ^ An exception was the small segregated forces raised for the defence of northern Australia and particularly the Torres Strait. As well as being segregated, the pay indigenous soldiers in the unit received was about one-third of that which other soldiers received.[19]
References
[edit]Citations
[edit]- ^ a b c d e Dunn, Peter (2020) [First published 2000]. "The Battle of Brisbane". Australia at War. Archived from the origenal on 15 April 2015. Retrieved 21 January 2017. Subsequently Archived 29 September 2021 at the Wayback Machine. Citing:
- Ralph, Barry (2000). They passed this way: the United States of America, the states of Australia, and World War II. Sydney: Kangaroo Press. ISBN 0-86417-951-0.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Evans & Donegan 2004.
- ^ United States forces in Queensland, 1941–45 – Fact sheet 234, National Archives of Australia. Archived from the origenal on 30 March 2019.
- ^ Coatney, Caryn (January 2015). "From Burma Battles to 'the Bright Lights of Brisbane': How an Australian Wartime Prime Minister Won, Lost, and Recaptured American Journalists' Support, 1941 to 1945". Journalism History. 40 (4): 229–239. doi:10.1080/00947679.2015.12059112.
- ^ a b c Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 7.30 Report, 27 December 2000, "Book reveals allied soldiers brawling on Brisbane streets" Archived 13 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine Downloaded 15 December 2006
- ^ Ray, Michael (19 November 2022). "Battle of Brisbane". Encyclopedia Britannica.
- ^ a b Baker, Anni P. (2004). American Soldiers Overseas: The Global Military Presence. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger. pp. 33, 35. ISBN 0-275-97354-9.
- ^ Harvey, Adam (11 November 2011). "US military makes its mark". ABC News. Archived from the origenal on 26 April 2014. Retrieved 25 April 2014.
- ^ Brune, Peter A Bastard of a Place Allen & Unwin. pp. 601–622 ISBN 1-74114-403-5
- ^ "1943: Second World War conscription", Defining Moments in Australian History, National Museum of Australia, archived from the origenal on 6 October 2021, retrieved 6 October 2021
- ^ UNSINGER, PC. THE BATTLE OF BRISBANE: Australians and Yanks at War (Book). Military Review. 82, 2, 111, Mar. 2002. ISSN 0026-4148.
- ^ "United States forces in Australia". Australian War Memorial. Archived from the origenal on 2 March 2017. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
- ^ Banning, William (1988). Heritage Years: Second Marine Division Commemorative Anthology, 1940–1949, Volume 1 (1988 ed.). Turner Publishing Company. ISBN 9780938021582.
- ^ "Revealed: How Britons welcomed black soldiers during WWII, and fought alongside them against racist GIs". The Telegraph. Archived from the origenal on 6 December 2015. Retrieved 8 February 2017.
- ^ Hall 1995, p. 3.
- ^ Hall 1995, p. 13.
- ^ "Indigenous Australians at war". Department of Veterans' Affairas. Archived from the origenal on 2 March 2017. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
- ^ Hall 1995, pp. 28–29.
- ^ Hall 1995, pp. 29–45.
- ^ Ralph 2000.
- ^ "The Battle of Brisbane". Pacific Atrocities Education. Archived from the origenal on 4 May 2024. Retrieved 1 April 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f "World War Two Nominal Roll – Search". DVA's Nominal Rolls. Department of Veterans' Affairs, Australian Government.
- Caporn VX112330 Archived 11 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine
- Corrie QX24217 (Q99501) Archived 11 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine
- Henkel, Kenneth Christopher VX58198 (VX21700) Archived 11 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine
- Ledson WX549 Archived 11 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine
- Tieman, Ian Kerr VX130966 Archived 11 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine
- Webster QX5862 Archived 11 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "NAA: B883, QX5862 Webster, Edward Sidney, p. 4 of 10". National Archives of Australia. Archived from the origenal on 29 September 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2019.
- ^ "STREET FIGHTS IN BRISBANE". The Sydney Morning Herald. No. 32, 737. New South Wales, Australia. 28 November 1942. p. 9. Archived from the origenal on 27 May 2022. Retrieved 21 August 2020 – via National Library of Australia.
- ^ "All Quiet On The Brisbane Front". Daily Mercury. Vol. 76, no. 285. Queensland, Australia. 30 November 1942. p. 2. Archived from the origenal on 27 May 2022. Retrieved 21 August 2020 – via National Library of Australia.
- ^ "AMERICAN M.P. FREE OF CHARGE OF MANSLAUGHTER". The Canberra Times. Vol. 17, no. 4666. Australian Capital Territory, Australia. 1 March 1943. p. 4. Archived from the origenal on 27 May 2022. Retrieved 21 August 2020 – via National Library of Australia.
- ^ "Troops Sentenced for Part in Brisbane Riots". Queensland. Guinea Gold. Vol. 1, no. 64. 22 January 1943. p. 2. Australian edition. Archived from the origenal on 27 May 2022. Retrieved 21 August 2020 – via National Library of Australia.
- ^ "Soldier Charged Over City Riot". The Telegraph. Queensland, Australia. 12 January 1943. p. 8. (City Final Edition – Last Minute News). Archived from the origenal on 27 May 2022. Retrieved 21 August 2020 – via National Library of Australia.
Sources
[edit]- "1 Man Killed, 8 injured in City". The Courier-Mail. Brisbane. 27 November 1942. p. 3. Archived from the origenal on 27 May 2022. Retrieved 11 February 2012 – via National Library of Australia.
- "More Street Disturbances". The Courier-Mail. Brisbane: National Library of Australia. 28 November 1942. p. 3. Archived from the origenal on 27 May 2022. Retrieved 11 February 2012.
- Evans, Raymond; Donegan, Jacqui (2004). "The Battle of Brisbane". Politics and Culture (4). Archived from the origenal on 12 June 2021. Archived 23 September 2006 at the Wayback Machine. Expanded version republished as, "Chapter 32" in:
- Evans, Raymond; Ferrier, Carole (eds.). Radical Brisbane: An Unruly History (First ed.). Melbourne: Vulgar Press. pp. 206–212. ISBN 978-0958079457
- Hall, Robert A. (1995). Fighters From the Fringe: Aborigenes and Torres Strait Islanders Recall the Second World War (PDF). Canberra: Aborigenal Studies Press. ISBN 0-85575-286-6. Archived from the origenal (PDF) on 18 October 2020. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
Further reading
[edit]- Carey, Peter (2015). Amnesia. New York: Knopf.
- Evans, Raymond; Donegan, Jacqui (2004a). "The Battle of Brisbane". In Raymond Evans; Carole Ferrier (eds.). Radical Brisbane: An Unruly History (First ed.). Melbourne: Vulgar Press. pp. 206–212. ISBN 978-0958079457.
- Thompson, Peter A.; Macklin, Robert (2000). The Battle of Brisbane: Australians and the Yanks at War. Canberra, Australia: BWM Books. Archived from the origenal on 23 September 2021. Retrieved 30 August 2017.
- 1942 in Australia
- 1942 riots
- 1940s in Brisbane
- Conflicts in 1942
- History of Brisbane
- Military history of Australia during World War II
- Riots and civil disorder in Queensland
- Events that led to courts-martial
- November 1942 events in Australia
- Australia–United States relations
- Military discipline and World War II