Talk:Constitutional amendment

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

India (104th amendment)

This edit caught my eye. I have not reverted it, but in light of XX(368)(2) here, I'm wondering about presidential assent. It seems to me that, as it mentions nothing about that assent, the source cited is not sufficient to support an assertion that the constitution has been amended. Is this edit premature? Is a better or an additional supporting source needed? Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 09:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Constitutional reform in the Philippines which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creative Arts

My classmates — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.114.216.64 (talk) 03:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

India (104th amendment)

Move discussion in progress

Creative Arts

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier! Saves Data!