This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nigeria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nigeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NigeriaWikipedia:WikiProject NigeriaTemplate:WikiProject NigeriaNigeria
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lagos, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Lagos on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LagosWikipedia:WikiProject LagosTemplate:WikiProject LagosLagos
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support, I guess. I'm sure the RS's will follow. I think it's appropriate to move now and revisit in the extremely unlikely case that they don't. Red Slash04:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural close you are requesting we delete another university article for this university article to be renamed? You have to do something about the target article first. WP:AFD is not part of the RM process. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 05:05, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Should have been an uncontroversial no-brainer. Link already added to the article seems reliable enough to me. – Wbm1058 (talk) 12:56, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.