Talk:Portuguese pavement

Portugal High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

So, what is it?

The introduction fails to mention what "Portuguese pavement" is. There needs to be an explanation of what distinguishes Portuguese pavement from other types of pavement. 83.209.123.210 (talk) 11:10, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It’s just a form of sett (paving), and should be a subsection within that article, or at most an article within a series of parvement types, not something written as a tourism brochure. Why is it a separate article? Well, call it exotification, on the part of most English-speaking editors, and nacional-bacoquismo on the part of all the Zezés Camarinhas who created this and so many other such articles. Tuvalkin (talk) 00:08, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Low wages?

Low wages? it is considered one of the best payed works in the construction area. -Pedro 12:20, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Roberto Burle Marx

No mention of one of the most famous landscape architects of all time, despite him designing copacabana beach 'portugese pattern' as you describe it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.53.192 (talk) 20:46, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the sources?

The whole article gives a lot of information that comes from nothing. No citations, no external sources, no links.

links

if anyone is interested in adding these, feel free, they were used on the redundant calcada page: http://www.spec-net.com.au/press/1005/dc_tiles.htm http://www.calceteiro.com/Default.aspx?lang=en&id=145 http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Calceteiro1.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Calzada_Romana_053.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.58.127 (talk) 15:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Portuguese pavement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050213232059/http://fozibercalcada1.no.sapo.pt/ to http://fozibercalcada1.no.sapo.pt/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Olivença?

I think we better remove the statement about Olivença, not because it is false, but because it's misleading. Portuguese pavement can in fact be seen throughout Spain, albeit occasionally. It seems to me that the author was a bit too eager to underscore the supposed Portuguese identity of Olivença. Steinbach (talk) 07:48, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Steinbach (talk) I can only agree to remove the statement if you can provide other prominent examples of Portuguese pavement in Spain. Anyway, I think that the statement can be improved by rephrasing, as it gives too much emphasis to Olivença in detriment of the former Portuguese colonies which are, in my opinion, much more relevant.Herrikez (talk) 09:08, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relationship with other types of mosaics

I was reading Mithraism § Degrees of initiation and noticed a striking similarity between the given examples from Mithraeum of Felicissimus and the examples of Portuguese pavement, mainly in materials and technique. Could there be a connection? Perhaps with Roman mosaics in general? --Fernando Trebien (talk) 18:41, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]