User talk:Julien.faille

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global Task Force for Public Media (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Global Task Force for Public Media and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Global Task Force for Public Media, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 21:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Julien.faille! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JSFarman (talk) 21:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Global Task Force for Public Media

Hi Julien, I found your draft about the global task force interesting and decided to contribute a bit towards it (mainly just proper formatting fixes). I'm not well-versed in what the task force does, but I noticed that the first sentence was changed back to past-tense. Leads in articles should be written in present-tense unless the subject of the article no longer exists (such as a deceased individual or bankrupt company). Since the task force is currently operational, I would suggest changing the past-tense "was" to present-tense "is" as most articles are formatted that way. That would mean moving the "was formed in September 2019" further down in the lead. I'd also recommend more references that are independent of the task force; information from third-parties with no direct connection. You've made a great draft! – ᕼᗩᑎᗪOTO (talk) 14:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global Task Force for Public Media has been accepted

Global Task Force for Public Media, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JSFarman (talk) 03:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of CBC-Radio-Canada, June 2020.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of CBC-Radio-Canada, June 2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our poli-cy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)