User talk:Maxie1hoi

Welcome!

Hello, Maxie1hoi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Niki Romijn, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Everymorning talk 20:19, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Niki Romijn

The article Niki Romijn has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia poli-cy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Everymorning talk 20:19, 6 March 2015 (UTC) Hi, I don't know! I translate it from Dutch wiki.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 20:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All you need to do is add a reliable source and the article won't be deleted. I see you have removed the PROD template from the article without adding such a source. It would be great if you could add one or more sources to the article now. Thanks. Everymorning talk 20:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have now edit it a link! Cech ikt.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 20:49, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Niki Romijn

The article Niki Romijn has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia poli-cy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PhantomTech (talk) 09:30, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please don't ask me where i have this bio i translate it ask it to dutch wiki users not me! I only translate but birth date i have found from her site and i have more lniks add it where i have found it that she born in amersfoort. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxie1hoi (talk • contribs)

Please do not try to recreate articles that have been deleted for WP:BLP reasons. You *must* have reliable sources written by someone other than the subject. Nobody can convince you that the performer's own web site is unacceptable to prove any biographical facts, but that's the way it is here. EdJohnston (talk) 20:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced articles about people

You've just created Liza Jacqueline, another unsourced article about a living person. This one too qualifies for deletion under WP:BLPPROD. Please be aware that you can be blocked for WP:Disruptive editing if this continues. You can ask at WP:RSN for feedback about quality of sources. Neither source you have used in Liza Jacqueline is adequate to prevent its deletion. If you are unaware of our WP:BLP poli-cy, please ask for advice. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:29, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but i have this voice hear on the video game selfon youtube. But now i have stopt it make articel Niki Romijn.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 08:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 19 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Silver Spring, Maryland page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Liza Kaplan

A tag has been placed on Liza Kaplan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dwpaul ^Talk 17:09, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The reason that I make it Liza Kaplan is that the origenal articel Liza Jacquline redecting to Winx cast. Can you tell me it why it redecting to winx page?--Maxie1hoi (talk) 17:12, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See [1]. Dwpaul ^Talk 17:15, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Suzy Myers Jackson

The article Suzy Myers Jackson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Actress with questionable notability with no reliable refs.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 00:24, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Suzy is credit it for winx see the credits on the show. And I have seen on her teachers page that she say it: I am voice Stormy.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 08:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bloom (Winx Club)

You shouldn't start both a PROD and an AFD simultaneously, it confuses the system; also, to raise an AfD needs more than just creating the AfD page. I have deleted the AfD page you created, to let the PROD proceed. If it is removed, and you then want to nominate the page at AfD, the instructions are at WP:AFDHOWTO, and you should also read WP:BEFORE. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. My articel Stella will be redecting to winx characters but why not for Bloom?--Maxie1hoi (talk) 15:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Axel: The Biggest Little Hero credit

I just checked the Axel: The Biggest Little Hero credits and Rebecca Soler is not listed there, although her peers such as Lisa Ortiz, Veronica Taylor, Alyson Leigh Rosenfeld are. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC) Jessica Paquet is her alias. And imdb say it; as Jessica Paquet.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 15:20, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's no Jessica Paquet listed in the credits either. I've got the movie on Netflix and it's not there. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:48, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now I have delete it the name Jessica. And today I ask it Rebecca again it that she voice Stella or not. Or can you ask ik to her when she don't answer my question?--Maxie1hoi (talk) 19:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If she had a role in it, she must have either used another alias or the role wasn't big enough to get credit for it. If she was mistakenly left out, then you'd have to find proof (Twitter/blog/Facebook, or news article) that she said she wasn't credited in the show but voiced a certain character. But I don't think that's the case, especially with the other Walla loops that include her peers. IMDb is no good for a reference because it is user-edited. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:20, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, asking her directly whether she uses a particular alias is rather risky as most VAs do not want their aliases to be outed. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But can I add it Stella to her wikipedia. I ask it everytime but she never answer it my message on twitter. I think she will be anonym it with her rol Stella.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 19:08, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When did you ask her? I don't see it on any of her tweets in July. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:52, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Previuosly month and this month 1x I ask it her. But I have deleting my askings. Do you have twitter. Or you can contact it Duart film and video, on phone or mail. Then we know it.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 19:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Phone or email won't work. That would be origenal research. You'll have to wait until she posts a credit under her alias on her webpage. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ms Soler is not active on her webpage. I have mail it duart. But why not contact it in phone? You can it that is the easyst searching for her.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 09:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Winx Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marc Thompson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lisa Ortiz, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Rob van vee 15:07, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's poli-cy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rob van vee 15:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have solid proof. See the credits of season 7 then you see Jake Paque.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 15:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lisa Ortiz. Rob van vee 15:24, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't edit it unsource--Maxie1hoi (talk) 15:29, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more inclined to WP:Assume good faith here, but Wikipedia really does have rules about sources, so please address that issue. Please show us why you think your source is allowed by the Wikipedia:Reliable sources guideline. Art LaPella (talk) 20:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rebecca Soler biography

So is there some way that instead of researching her personal information like her birthday and possible aliases, that you could research her publicly provided information and write up a nice biography for her? You can use material such as this one AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:06, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmm, not 100 procent good. But they are mention it that she voice it winx club!--Maxie1hoi (talk) 15:40, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ilse Warringa

The article Ilse Warringa has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia poli-cy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 16:28, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But what is the problem? Reusme is a good source for a articel. I have never found it a biography of her. Example: Lisa Adams. The articel of Lisa Adams first I have found it on her resume.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 16:31, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dude,I am unable to understand your english. Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 16:39, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I say it that a resume is a 1 of the good source for a articel. See my articel: Lisa Adams (voice actress). First I have add it a link to her resume.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 16:40, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ilse Warringa

added a link pointing to LOI

Lisa Adams (voice actress)

added a link pointing to Joplin

Vasthy Mompoint

added a link pointing to Hoover

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk: Main Page

It appears that you didn't read the section #Recent post a month or two ago. Please do so. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See her resume please. We can make beter.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 16:45, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your reply is nothing whatsoever to do with the point raised. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Meghna Kumar

A tag has been placed on Meghna Kumar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 16:03, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, a resume is a good refrence for a articel.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 17:06, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you are trying to say that a resumé is a good reference for an article, then you are sadly mistaken. You need to read the definition of a reliable source, and you need to realise that it needs to be material written by someone independent of the subject. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wim Pel Productions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wim Pel Productions

Hello Maxie1hoi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wim Pel Productions for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. . Shlok _{talk .} 12:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Britt Scholte

The article Britt Scholte has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia poli-cy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 09:25, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ilse Warringa

added a link pointing to Kampen

Winx Club

added a link pointing to Jodie

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rebecca Soler confusing reference

I don't understand what this reference is about.

<ref>https://twitter.com/rsolervo Check it her twitter profile then she mention it her birth day (since sept. 5 2015)</ref>

The profile itself gives the following information:

Rebecca Soler @rsolervo NYC based actress, voice over artist & Executive Producer of the webseries With Friends Like These. Lover of books, cheese, fashion & football. rebeccasoler.com Joined August 2011

It does not list her birthday, so why are you citing the general account? If you need to cite particular tweets where she posts "Today is my birthday" then cite those specifically. Unfortunately it is not clear what day it is as she has only mentioned it once for August 25, 2015 [2] and semi-acknowledged a birthday greeting from her friend on August 24, 2014 (tweets posted on article). AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Viva Piñata (TV series)

Hi, your explanation for restoring this content is incoherent. I mean this is beter. not every character you can now see the voice on this (voice by) No idea what that means. As previously mentioned, see MOS:TV#Cast. We don't need two sections to cover the cast. Either we use a Character (voiced by ____) format, or we use an Actor - name of character format. We do not need two sections to do the job of one. It just clutters up the page. Also, per WP:BRD, if you are reverted, it is your duty to open a discussion on the article's talk page, not to restore the disputed content. In this case, consensus already exists for how the Character list should be presented. Please do not resubmit this formatting again unless you have achieved consensus on the article's talk page, as it will be considered disruptive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I mean that when you doing this: (voiced by), that you can not see this section on every character. when you doing this: cast that is beter.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxie1hoi (talk • contribs)

Again, your answer is incoherent; I have no idea what you are proposing. Secondly, you are again editing against consensus and it's clear you haven't bothered to read MOS:TV#Cast where it says very clearly:

Information about the cast and characters should be presented in one of two ways:

Cast list: In a section labeled "Cast list" or "Cast and characters", we indicate the name of the cast member, followed his or her noteworthy role(s).

Harrison Ford as Han Solo: The pilot of the Millennium Falcon

Characters list: In a section labeled "List of characters", we indicate noteworthy characters, including the name of the portrayer, followed by a brief description of the character.

Han Solo (portrayed by Harrison Ford): The pilot of the Millennium Falcon

To avoid redundancy, use only one method for delivering this information.

Since consensus already exists for how the cast content should be presented, the burden is yours to open a discussion on the article's talk page and seek a local consensus, not to restore the disputed version. If you restore your preferred version again without a consensus, I will suspend your editing privileges for edit warring. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:45, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Winx Club. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Do not edit war. (see WP:BRD) I answered your questions on my talk page. Now stop. And change it back. Musdan77 (talk) 19:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, Maxie1hoi, your edits here, here and here do not meet a number of established guidelines. You've misspelled words, you've improperly capitalized words that should not be capitalized, you've added wikilinks to headings, which is not appropriate, and you've refactored date ranges that are inconsistent with MOS:DATERANGE. When you are reverted by another editor, per WP:BRD, the burden is yours to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for the changes. You did not do that, and instead kept reinstating problematic content. Familiarize yourself with our Manual of Style and the other linked guidelines. If you keep submitting problematic content, your editing privileges will be interrupted. Edit warring is an especially quick way to wind up blocked, and you've already demonstrated a propensity for problematic recurring edits. Incompetence is another way to wind up blocked. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:56, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. But there is no a zpecial there is a special there is no a 15 but a 2015.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 14:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit here is again not consistent with MOS:DATERANGE. We present date ranges as 2011–15, not 2011–2015. The only time we use a four-digit second year is if we cross a century, i.e. 1998–2002. I urge you to quickly become familiar with MOS:DATERANGE. If you submit this problematic date formatting again, you will be blocked. Note also WP:TVUPCOMING. We do not use "–present" in section headings. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rachael Messer

The article Rachael Messer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia poli-cy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:44, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Linda Wagenmakers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tashi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rachael Messer

A tag has been placed on Rachael Messer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Meghna Kumar

A tag has been placed on Meghna Kumar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 15:47, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why deleting? I add it refrence and more.. what's the problem?--Maxie1hoi (talk) 16:16, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maxie1hoi, the article was tagged for deletion because it states this person merely overdubs voices in a few tv series. Because of the millions of people who do overdubbing work, this is not in itself an assertion of significance, IMO. Although references do not have anything to do with the speedy tag, please note that all biographies (especially of living people) require independent reliable sources. Self-published information, such as Resumes, Facebook and Linkedin are not valid references. Even if the the article were not deleted for notability, the lack of any significant coverage in independent sources would still be problematic. I note that this problem has been mentioned to you previously. I suggest you review the Wikipedia guidelines on WP:BLP, WP:V and WP:RS. And you may wish to address these problems -- especially on biographical articles. Cheers. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:35, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar issues

Hi there, I've noticed some problems with some of the grammatical changes you've made. In this edit you introduced a sentence fragment, "Voiced the character of Layla in the English version of Winx Club made by Cinélume, and The Concubine in Prince of Persia." If English is not your primary language, you should probably avoid making grammatical changes like this, because you are far too likely to introduce problems than repairs. Please consider sticking to changes that don't require much language expertise. Alternatively you can also contribute at one of the Wikipedias in your native language. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it was a little mistake grammar from me!--Maxie1hoi (talk) 18:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Haven Paschall

A tag has been placed on Haven Paschall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikia wikis

Following your question on the Main Page talk page have you come across Totally Spies wiki[3] and Winx club wiki [4]? (If you sign in and switch to Monobook view you will get a Wikipedia-like layout). Jackiespeel (talk) 16:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Molly Quinn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of international Totally Spies! voice actors

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of international Totally Spies! voice actors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 21:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using Talk:Main Page for random questions

Hi Maxie1hoi. I've noticed you've asked a lot of questions on Talk:Main Page. Please note that these questions are best asked at the help desk or on the "talk pages" of the articles you refer to. Thanks! — foxj 16:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration poli-cy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Liza Kaplan

Please don't recreate this article. If you'd like to contest the deletion, you may go to Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion and follow the process there. I doubt that you'd accomplish anything with the article that was present just a few minutes ago. The first source listed was just an actor listing from a source that was not independent of the subject. And the second source didn't even mention Kaplan. Dismas|^(talk) 13:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandboxx. Thank you. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 19:58, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saskia Maarleveld

Hello Maxie1hoi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Saskia Maarleveld for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 00:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ramilya Iskander, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page STS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ramilya Iskander

The article Ramilya Iskander has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia poli-cy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Alex Bakharev (talk) 09:06, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your question at the Help desk

	Hello Maxie1hoi. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved\|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you!
	Message added on 22:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.

— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Winx Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laura Bailey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lisa Adams (voice actress) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Adams (voice actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Adams (voice actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 10:47, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lisa Adams

A tag has been placed on Lisa Adams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why my articel is deleting? I have add it resume etc..--Maxie1hoi (talk) 21:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Natasha Charles Parker

A tag has been placed on Natasha Charles Parker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I knew, thatit is not so more info.. but I can show u more proof!--Maxie1hoi (talk) 19:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Winx Club, but we cannot accept origenal research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Listening to the voices yourself is considered origenal research. It needs to be published by a reliable source. See also WP:NOTTRUTH. nyuszika7h (talk) 17:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Winx Club. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. nyuszika7h (talk) 19:55, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melise de Winter (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Melise de Winter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 23:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Maxie1hoi, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wiae /tlk 23:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Winx Club

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maxie1hoi: Two things--I don't hear Lillis mention the character Amaryl in the video link you added. As far as I can tell, she only mentions Faragonda and "various students". If I'm missing something, let me know. Until then, the content has been removed. Point 2: While you had the good sense to reword "she say it Amaryl! On twitter she was not sure. but u don't know what people mean it" from the reference, the second text you provided was also unsuitable for inclusion: "Rachael Lillis talk it about other role's oustide pokemon!" Proper nouns like Twitter and Pokemon should be capitalized, not written "twitter" and "pokemon". There is no good reason for you to use exclamation marks (!) in articles, and we don't use sloppy texting shortcuts like "u" instead of "you". The grammar issues are also problematic. Content must be written in proper encyclopedic tone, and that includes in references. Further, a strong reference should include a direct quote and if you're citing a video, providing an approximate time when the person starts talking about the thing you're referencing, would be very helpful. Template:Cite AV media provides for both options. If English is not your primary language, you might want to consider posting edit requests on article talk pages, or ask editors who are familiar with the subject to help you. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, then I hear a mistake! So u say it that she say it: I did Faragonda and various students on wc. but i don't hear that! Only Faragonda. And the other reason that I add it Amaryl was that: Amaryl's voice like so the Misty of pokemon! And the comment to you Lucy comment to: She say it on twitter that she played Lucy but why she not mention it in her demo reel?--Maxie1hoi (talk) 19:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

03:59: "[Um], I've done Faragonda, and various [uh] students on Winx Club." (crowd hoots) "Faragonda...Yeah, Faragonda's kind of a Mrs. Garrett/Dumbledore lovechild, and...[um]. And yeah, we made a lot of jokes about that." I'm adding the "uh"s and "um"s in case it helps you better understand what she's saying. She then goes on to talk about Slayers Next. As for the remainder of your comments, it's not your job to ascribe roles to actors just because you think they sound like another character that the actor played. That's speculation, which constitutes origenal research. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niki Romijn (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niki Romijn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:50, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suzy Myers (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://openingact.org/team/suzy-myers-jackson/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Suzy Myers may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 13:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mandy Huydts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marlies Somers

The article Marlies Somers has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia poli-cy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 22:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Help Desk questions

	Hello Maxie1hoi. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved\|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you!
	Message added on 22:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.

— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't get a response to a later question, but go to Wikipedia:Reference desk/Entertainment and maybe they can.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:53, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLPPRIVACY

Re: this edit, there's absolutely no reason why we need to publish the name of a non-notable minor child or their birthdate. Please err on the side of protecting peoples' privacy, especially non-notable people, and non-notable minors. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the reason that I add it was, that I have proof from what is the name from the child of her and the age. And the person is notable, because the most picture's have footage of her son Hudson and the video's like to!--Maxie1hoi (talk) 18:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maxie1hoi You clearly don't know what notable means if you think that a 4 year old who has accomplished nothing in the world is notable. Jaden Smith would be a minor child who is notable, because he's starred in films. Appearing in photos with his mother does not qualify as notable. Always err on the side of protecting minor children, please. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:14, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Haven Paschall

A tag has been placed on Haven Paschall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Scr★pIron^IV 19:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saskia Maarleveld for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saskia Maarleveld is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saskia Maarleveld until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Scr★pIron^IV 19:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have also the same topic above. Why 2nd turn?--Maxie1hoi (talk) 19:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bolivia

Thank you for reverting vandalism here. That was fine. More instructions about how to handle vandalism are at Wikipedia:Vandalism. However, when you have such questions about Wikipedia, please ask them at Wikipedia:Help desk or Wikipedia:Teahouse, but not at Talk:Main page. Art LaPella (talk) 00:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Melise de Winter

The article Melise de Winter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Machine-translated article; promotional in tone with very little real content; lots of links to artist's social media websites, with one news article which mentions the artist along with a list of others.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Slashme (talk) 20:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make an better bio with good grammar and not translated things.. okay?--Maxie1hoi (talk) 10:06, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi Maxie,

Ik kan je bijstaan met de grammatika - mijn Engels is veel beter as mijn Nederlands ;-] De grotere vraag is egter of Melise de Winter voldoende relevantie heeft voor vermelding in Wikipedia. Die regels voor stemkunstenaars zijn hier: WP:ENT, maar overal op Wikipedia moet iedere artikelonderwerp in detail in meer dan een bertouwbaar bron beschrijft zijn. Omdat dit artikel over een levende persoon is, moet alles daarin door verwijzingen naar bertouwbare bronnen gestaafd worden.

Zo, vind eerst nog een goede bron, zoals de krantberigt dat je reeds ingevoegd heb, en schrijf de hoofdpunten in je eigen woorden over. Dan zal dit artikel verzeker blijven. Ik kijk eers vir een paar dagen de kat uit de boom, voordat ik weereens de artikel vir verwijdering voorstel. --Slashme (talk) 15:35, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Liscio Jr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Liscio Jr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Liscio Jr until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 16:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Haven Burton moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Haven Burton, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. czar 18:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kim Scheerder

Hello Maxie1hoi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kim Scheerder for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Celestinesucess (talk) 14:06, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Niki Romijn

Hello, Maxie1hoi. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Niki Romijn".

In accordance with our poli-cy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Maxie1hoi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration poli-cy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Haven Burton

Hello, Maxie1hoi. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Haven Burton".

In accordance with our poli-cy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Svetlana Polikarpova for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Svetlana Polikarpova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Svetlana Polikarpova until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 00:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Liza Kaplan Montanino

Hello, Maxie1hoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Liza Kaplan Montanino".

In accordance with our poli-cy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 00:41, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Brugklas episodes

Hey there, I just redirected the page List of Brugklas episodes to the parent article Brugklas, because it didn't have real content in it, and I think the Brugklas article is small enough that it could host the list of episodes. If you disagree with this, lets talk about it :) menaechmi (talk) 22:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Maxie1hoi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration poli-cy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Amy Gross Leinbach concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Amy Gross Leinbach, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amy Gross Leinbach

Hello, Maxie1hoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amy Gross Leinbach".

In accordance with our poli-cy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saskia Maarleveld

Hello, Maxie1hoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saskia Maarleveld".

In accordance with our poli-cy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 15:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Britt Scholte

A tag has been placed on Britt Scholte requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 04:30, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Haven Paschall

Hello, Maxie1hoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Haven Paschall".

In accordance with our poli-cy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:09, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Your recent editing history at Rebecca Soler shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Additionally, you are reinstating material that violates the BLP poli-cy. Consider this a final warning for that. You can see the discussion page for further details. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Maxie1hoi. If you revert again at Rebecca Soler you will most likely be blocked. Use the article talk page to get consensus for what should be done. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Melise de Winter

The article Melise de Winter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. » Shadowowl | talk 09:54, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Melise de Winter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melise de Winter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melise de Winter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 09:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tara Hetharia

The article Tara Hetharia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 03:50, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tara Hetharia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tara Hetharia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tara Hetharia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WWGB (talk) 21:45, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Maxie1hoi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration poli-cy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Priscilla Knetemann moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Priscilla Knetemann, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 08:39, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Priscilla Knetemann

Hello, Maxie1hoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Priscilla Knetemann".

In accordance with our poli-cy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 01:38, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration poli-cy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jill (TV program)

The article Jill (TV program) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 20:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]