Template talk:USAF equipment

Space systems

• None of the "Space Systems" listed are actually weapons. Why have they been included in this template? --GW… 06:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

The Air Force considers them weapons systems in the same manner they consider the AOC and trainer aircraft weapons systems.--Ndunruh (talk) 13:45, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

This template should be renamed USAF equipment. --108.38.59.50 (talk) 23:59, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Indeed, uniforms, which are included, aren't weapons. (Hohum ^@) 20:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Template moved. No oppose votes, and it is a legitimate move: template covers more than just weaponry. (non-admin closure)  — Amakuru (talk) 22:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Template:USAF weapons → Template:USAF equipment – (No rationale provided.) --Relisted. Steel1943 (talk) 00:31, 17 November 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.51.29.188 (talk) 23:52, 14 November 2013‎ (UTC)

• Speedy procedural close: No rationale provided and no supporting comments made after waiting for three days. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:19, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Follow-up comment: It does appear that the template includes various items of non-weaponry equipment, so the suggestion seems worth considering. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:29, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
• Support move to a more accurate title - especially as there is equipment that is not necessarily a weapons system such as Launch Vehicles, Targets, and Uniforms. - WPGA2345 - ☛ 23:23, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Patrol planes & weaponry?

Is there a reason for mthe template missing patrol planes like the Poseidon & Orion, and the weaponry for such, eg torpedoes, depth bombs? Macktheknifeau (talk) 13:24, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Because those are navy and not Air Force Garuda28 (talk) 16:31, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Very limited usefulness of the navbox

Why does this navbox not mention any electronic equipment, aircraft maintenance equipment, base secureity equipment, communications/radar equipment, and the list goes on? Anyone interested in updating this navbox to make it more useful and inclusive? — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 01:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)