About: Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc.

An Entity of Type: WikicatUnitedStatesDistrictCourtCases, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc., 337 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (N.D. Cal. 2004), was a lawsuit involving an archive of Diebold's (now Premier Election Solutions) internal company e-mails and Diebold's contested copyright claims over them. The Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Stanford Cyberlaw Clinic provided pro bono legal support for the non-profit ISP and the Swarthmore College students, respectively.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc., 337 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (N.D. Cal. 2004), was a lawsuit involving an archive of Diebold's (now Premier Election Solutions) internal company e-mails and Diebold's contested copyright claims over them. The Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Stanford Cyberlaw Clinic provided pro bono legal support for the non-profit ISP and the Swarthmore College students, respectively. United States District Judge Jeremy Fogel ruled that the plaintiffs' publishing of the e-mails was clearly a fair use essentially "because there was no commercial harm and no diminishment of value of the works" in their republication. Additionally Diebold was found to have misrepresented its copyright controls over the work, putting them in violation of section 512(f) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and leaving them liable for court costs and damages. This was the first time 512(f) had been enforced in court, and set a precedent. (en)
dbo:thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/US_DC_NorCal.svg?width=300
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://www.eff.org/cases/online-policy-group-v-diebold https://www.leagle.com/decision/20041532337fsupp2d119511436 http://www.onlinepolicy.org https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=9280842894530460095 https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4165496/online-policy-group-v-diebold-incorporated/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2470092/online-policy-group-v-diebold-inc/ http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2003/09/29/16494191.php
dbo:wikiPageID	6880635 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	12838 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1116200939 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Campbell_v._Acuff-Rose_Music,_Inc. dbc:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California_cases dbr:Premier_Election_Solutions dbr:F._Supp._2d dbc:Diebold dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California dbr:Internet_service_provider dbr:Will_Doherty dbr:Electronic_Frontier_Foundation dbc:Electronic_Frontier_Foundation_litigation dbc:2004_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act_case_law dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law dbr:Fair_use dbr:Cindy_Cohn dbr:Lenz_v._Universal_Music_Corp. dbr:Misrepresentation dbr:Hurricane_Electric dbc:United_States_computer_case_law dbr:Jeremy_Fogel dbr:Swarthmore_College dbr:Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act dbc:Swarthmore_College dbr:Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Universal_City_Studios,_Inc. dbr:Indymedia dbr:Upstream_(networking) dbr:Diebold dbr:IndyMedia dbr:Indybay dbr:N.D._Cal. dbr:Pro_bono_publico dbr:Stanford_Cyberlaw_Clinic dbr:David_Weekly dbr:MGM_v._Grokster dbr:Swarthmore_Coalition_for_the_Digital_Commons dbr:U.S.P.Q.2d dbr:Web_host dbr:Luke_Thomas_Smith dbr:Roger_Klorese
dbp:case	172800.0
dbp:citations	17280.0
dbp:court	dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California
dbp:courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2470092/online-policy-group-v-diebold-inc/
dbp:dateDecided	2004-09-30 (xsd:date)
dbp:docket	5 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullName	Online Policy Group , Nelson Chu Pavlosky, and Luke Thomas Smith v. Diebold, Incorporated and Diebold Election Systems, Incorporated (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=9280842894530460095
dbp:imagesize	150 (xsd:integer)
dbp:judge	dbr:Jeremy_Fogel
dbp:leagle	https://www.leagle.com/decision/20041532337fsupp2d119511436
dbp:name	Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist dbt:Infobox_United_States_District_Court_case
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California_cases dbc:Diebold dbc:Electronic_Frontier_Foundation_litigation dbc:2004_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act_case_law dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law dbc:United_States_computer_case_law dbc:Swarthmore_College
rdf:type	yago:WikicatUnitedStatesDistrictCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:comment	Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc., 337 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (N.D. Cal. 2004), was a lawsuit involving an archive of Diebold's (now Premier Election Solutions) internal company e-mails and Diebold's contested copyright claims over them. The Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Stanford Cyberlaw Clinic provided pro bono legal support for the non-profit ISP and the Swarthmore College students, respectively. (en)
rdfs:label	Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc. yago-res:Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc. wikidata:Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc. https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4shfx
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Online_Policy_Group_v._Diebold,_Inc.?oldid=1116200939&ns=0
foaf:depiction	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/US_DC_NorCal.svg
foaf:homepage	https://www.eff.org/cases/online-policy-group-v-diebold
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Online_Policy_Group_v._Diebold,_Inc.
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:OPG_v._Diebold dbr:Online_Policy_Group dbr:Online_Policy_Group_v._Diebold,_Inc dbr:Online_Policy_Group_v._Diebold
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Intellectual_Reserve,_Inc._v._Utah_Lighthouse_Ministry,_Inc. dbr:List_of_litigation_involving_the_Electronic_Frontier_Foundation dbr:OPG_v._Diebold dbr:Copyfraud dbr:Online_Policy_Group dbr:Online_Copyright_Infringement_Liability_Limitation_Act dbr:Online_Policy_Group_v._Diebold,_Inc dbr:Online_Policy_Group_v._Diebold
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Online_Policy_Group_v._Diebold,_Inc.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.

About: Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc.

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.