Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 197.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 10:10, 31 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 17:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you retouch that half person in the background? Otherwise would be ok. --Plozessor 19:03, 25 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
PC and crop applied, is that better? I can't remove them fully without also removing the top of the chess pieces. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Thx, I think it's ok now. --Plozessor 13:15, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 05:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:At Sardinia 2024 061.jpg

edit
 
File:At Sardinia 2024 061.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 12:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 640.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 10:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angel of the North 2016 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 16:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estádio do Pacaembu, Sao Paulo 2017 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estádio do Pacaembu, Sao Paulo 2017 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 07:35, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 19:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 13:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 351.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Btspurplegalaxy 05:53, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estádio do Pacaembu, Sao Paulo 2017 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Silesian Park 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:17, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 426.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality --Tzim78 22:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia 2024 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 16:17, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia 2024 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can you smoothen the jpeg-artefacts in the sky? --PtrQs 01:26, 30 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review, I've tried reducing the noise, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:23, 30 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
I fear, there are still stripes of blue/green/purple in the sky - this can only be corrected by decreasing the shift/highlighting of colors - as far as my LR-experience goes. --PtrQs 00:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ah, I think I see them, but they are difficult to spot. I've backed off the highlights alterations and tried reducing colour noise, has that helped? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:05, 4 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
OK, it's better now. --PtrQs 17:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Name of File:At Sardinia 2024 068.jpg

edit

Hi Mike Peel, your photo File:At Sardinia 2024 068.jpg is not from Britain, not from Sardinia, at least according to the description and the categorization. It should be renamed, preferably to something like 9H-QAC aircraft at London Stansted Airport 2024 068.jpg. Thanks and all the best --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:24, 7 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

It's the plane I caught back from Sardinia. You're welcome to rename it if you want, but I'm never sure that it's worth putting much effort into filenames. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done I made a rename request. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:03, 7 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Frankfurt am Main 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 09:50, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Frankfurt am Main 2024 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:09, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia 2024 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 10:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angel of the North 2016 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:32, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2019 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2019 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --TorinoDoc 11:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2019 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2019 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia 2024 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy