Commons:Administrators/Requests/Ralgis

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Support = 12;  Oppose = 8;  Neutral = 0 - 60% Result. Unsuccessful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vote

Ralgis (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 05:53, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

I would like to nominate Ralgis to be an administrator. He has been on Commons since 5th November 2011. Since then, he has made over 7600 edits on Commons of which 382 are on project namespace and 30000 globally. He has image reviewer, patroller, rollbacker, OTRS member rights on Commons, patroller, rollbacker on es.wiki and especially, a bureaucrat, admin at eswikinews. His main work here involves in deletion requests, image reviewing and copyvio/no permission tagging, which is valuable for an administrator. He has accepted to my proposal, see here. Thank you for participating--Morning (talk) 05:53, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for nominating me, Morning. I hope the community can trust me, and I hope to do a great job helping this great project and its users. --RalgisWM-CR 02:32, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Comments

I am a little troubled by this answer. Since it consists of nothing but text in an ordinary typeface, it seems to me very clearly {{PD-textlogo}}. Everything else is irrelevant. While Ralgis's answer describes steps in a process, it does not answer the question -- what would he do with the image? .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was responding in "generic terms" because I wanted to demostrate that I understand the process, but in relation to that particular image, I would remove the licencing as provided and replace it with {{PD-textlogo}}, which is of course the case, because due to other cases it does not meet the threshold of originality. I would replace the source with the right source instead of a Google search. I also would leave a message to the uploader explaining him/her that in Commons we need the actual source instead of a generic search. Of course, I would do all those things right away. --RalgisWM-CR 01:55, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good response Ralgis. It's also good to see that the changes you have made to the file are inline with what we need on Commons (such as the correct source, etc). I think this, as well as your "generic" answers above show you have a sound knowledge of policies, etc. russavia (talk) 03:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Good point -- an RfA is probably the most important thing one of us will ever do on Commons and he seems to have a two day turn-around in responding to most of the questions and comments above. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:44, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]