Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/15

14 August 2024

16 August 2024

Deletion requests on 15 August 2024

August 15

File:Transmac-MT4 TERMINAL MARITIMO DE PASSAGEIROS DA TAIPA.png

The file already has its updated version without misspelled titles and incorrectly made file. ATE205 (talk) 02:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Institut du monde arabe

The building was completed in 1987 by Jean Nouvel (1945–). There is no freedom of panorama in France, permission from the architect is required.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amanmeet foto.jpg

Same as his insta profile pic - https://www.instagram.com/amanmeetsingh_/reels/ - think we need VRT Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2024081510005845 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 12:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Krdbot is more productive than me, it has half a million contributions, while I have less than half a dozen. Delete. 186.173.51.202 21:40, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No scope. 186.173.51.202 21:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Lactasoy

The main body of these photos are outer packaging and may be protected by copyright. --Thyj (talk) 06:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, some. E.g. File:HK TST 尖沙咀 Tsim Sha Tsui 柯士甸道 140 Austin Road Market Place by Jasons Supermarket goods Thai Soymilk product brand 大力獅 Lactasoy September 2022 Px3 03.jpg might be ok, as it contains only text. The text on the label of a milk package is probably not original enough to be protected by copyright. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK TST 尖沙咀 Tsim Sha Tsui 柯士甸道 140 Austin Road Market Place by Jasons Supermarket goods Thai Soymilk product brand 大力獅 Lactasoy September 2022 Px3 05.jpg or File:HK TST 尖沙咀 Tsim Sha Tsui 柯士甸道 140 Austin Road Market Place by Jasons Supermarket goods Thai Soymilk product brand 大力獅 Lactasoy September 2022 Px3 07.jpg seem like a better bet for that, but I think several might possibly be views that are below COM:TOO Hong Kong or possibly covered under de minimis with possibly copyrightable symbols so small in context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow, Andropova Prospect through Nagatinskaya Poyma floodlands (31109365495).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 08:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment billboard image can be edited out as it is not the focus of the image. As for the billboard image itself, it's mostly just text and the scrambled text logo of the Russian TV channel TNT (Russian: ТНТ). That logo is on Commons: Category:TNT (Russia) logos. Nakonana (talk) 22:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The photo of the person on the billboard is clearly over minimis. A modified version of the photo would probably be ok with the billboard blurred or the top part of photo cropped; may be submitted to graphics lab if you wish. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piazza ognissanti, monumento.JPG

No FoP in Italy, artist Romano Romanelli died in 1968 A1Cafel (talk) 08:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexandru Vitalaru.jpg

Out of COM:SCOPE personal photo. Gikü (talk) 10:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Appears to be a Romanian scholar / academic judging by Google Scholar [1], but the image is also used on the page of this veterinary association [2], so not sure about copyright. There was also a Wiki article on him on Romanian Wikipedia which got deleted on 15 August [3] by the filer. Nakonana (talk) 22:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Зетта Страхование.jpg

Almost exact copy of File:Центральный офис компании в Москве.jpg Drakosh (talk) 10:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Darshana Patel Headshot (cropped).jpg

Unused crop, unnecessary file 186.174.169.20 10:57, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SYMBOLISME DES DRAPEAUX DU MAROC, DE L'ALGÉRIE ET DE LA TUNISIE.png

Chart is a personal creation with no legend or definition of its content; it also makes POV claims about countries, here again with no reliable source Moumou82 (talk) 12:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Difference entre le drapeau du Maroc et le drapeau de l'Algérie.png

Chart is a personal creation with no legend or definition of its content; it also makes POV claims about countries, here again with no reliable source Moumou82 (talk) 12:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Les principaux territoires berbères.png

Chart is a personal creation with no legend or definition of its content; it also makes POV claims about countries, here again with no reliable source Moumou82 (talk) 12:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This one is COM:INUSE, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Les 12 régions de l'État marocain par chef-lieu.png

Chart is a personal creation with no legend or definition of its content so cannot be used Moumou82 (talk) 12:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:St. Peter und Paul (Weil am Rhein)

copyvio; artworks from 1989 or later, no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HŽPP 1141 382 + 1141 389.jpg

duplicate of File:HŽPP 1141 382 + 1141 389 (53180861044).jpg Ma▀▄Ga 13:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ScottGalan.New.Fashion.jpg

Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung - Urheber soll die abgebildete Person sein, es handelt sich allerdings nicht um ein Selfie Lutheraner (talk) 13:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elreno2011.PNG

This photo is extracted from a conference paper presented at the 26th Conference on Severe Local Storms held by the American Meteorological Society, Poster Session P7, 3:00 PM-4:15 PM: Wednesday, 7 November 2012, Loews Vanderbilt Hotel, Nashville. The paper is downloadable in PDF format here. The photo is on page 2 and was taken near near Calumet, Oklahoma, shortly after May 24, 2011.

The conference paper was co-authored by four people, three of whom were employees of the NWS, and one an employee of a private enterprise, Haag Engineering Co., Irving, Texas. The paper doesn't identify the source of the photo; whether it was one of the four authors or someone else entirely.

The uploader has tagged it with {{PD-NWS}}, claiming that it is in the public domain because:

it was "stored on the web servers of the U.S. National Weather Service" and
the NWS Sioux Falls regional office once hosted a photo competition where a condition of entry was that any submitted photo "is being released into the public domain"

However, putting aside any scrutiny of these two rationales in this instance: because we don't know who actually took it, we have no evidence that this photo was taken by a federal government employee in the course of their duties (which would have made it ineligible for copyight in the first place) or that, if copyright ever did exist over this image, we have no evidence of permission that it was ever transferred into the public domain.

Works created in the US since 1989 do not need to be published with a copyright notice or to have their copyright registered in order to be protected. The conference paper was published in 2011.

The source, as given by the uploader, is not hosted on an NWS web server, nor is there any evidence that it ever was.

Nor is there any evidence to suggest that it was ever entered into a photo competition at NWS Sioux Falls.

In short, there is no evidence to suggest this photo is in the public domain or available under a free license. Rlandmann (talk) 13:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Neutral — It is not a PD-NWS template, that’s for sure. However, I cannot confidently say “delete” as an article by an IWeatherNet meteorologist claims the photograph is in the public domain, giving possible indications for a CC-zero template. For that reason, I cannot say to delete it, but the PD-NWS template should be removed. WeatherWriter (talk) 14:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Yeah, could be. One of the challenges I'm seeing when trying to track some of these down when the primary links are dead is that a lot of sources are relying on Wikipedia or Commons as their sources, meaning that if we've got the analysis wrong, we've given them bad advice. The scariest one I've seen is one of the images still in my "too hard basket" but which I've found used on an album cover...! Someone is now making money off an image that we've said is free and I think probably isn't. (Or where's there's at least significant doubt...) --Rlandmann (talk) 15:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unless a posting/confirmation from before when it was uploaded to Commons under that template can be found and it be retagged appropriately, we must presume that anyone after we uploaded it was using it under circular referencing, which is a type of license laundering (even if unintentional). Berchanhimez (talk) 22:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per @Berchanhimez; I think precautionary principle applies here. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 16:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral per WeatherWriter. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 01:21, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral per WeatherWriter. ChessEric (talk) 04:49, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yannick Neuder.png

Image shows other person, not Yannick Neuder. Barzdonas (talk) 14:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:বন্য দিয়ে আকা বাঁকা রাস্তা কুয়াশা গেড়া, বান্দোর বন্য, বাংলাদেশ.jpg

Low quality edit of a PD photograph, falsely claimed by uploader to be own work (see their last edit on the page). Boylarva99 (talk) 14:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little amsterdam.jpg

Image in copyright, no evidence that uploader was copyright holder MorrisStuff (talk) 15:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Good-Times.opus

The source website [4] is showing the file is royalty free, which is not compatible with the Commons License on the file page CCBYSA4.0. The file page mentions if one wants to make changes, the recording should be purchased. This is not compatible with the Commons licensing. Ellywa (talk) 15:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After a second look of what the source website now, I agree with you this should be deleted on commons. This piece of music was an initiative that I tried with Wikimedia Taiwan to ask some of more open oriented online firms in Taiwan to donate some of their contents. But it seems the license has evolved and become clear that this is not compatible anymore. Shangkuanlc (talk) 06:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:مطورين PRO TOUCH 20180411 171250.jpg

COM:SPAM, likely self-promotional image; no usage and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BiTH Unofficial logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sound of Music logo.png

Not used and better version at File:Sound of Music - 1980.svg 67.23.251.242 16:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BVlogo.jpg

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 16:40, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Might be in scope. There are a number of those logos here: Category:Bottega Veneta. Nakonana (talk) 23:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nakonana: Hmm, interesting. Although, I don't really understand the point of having multiple copies (in the category you mentionned) of the same file. 😕🤷‍♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 12:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Εὐθυμένης They are different versions with different lettering and cropping. But I'm also not sure, whether we need this many versions of the logo. Nakonana (talk) 13:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fichiers de l'utilisateur:StéphanieLagueux

Toutes ces images ont été téléversées par moi-même User:StéphanieLagueux, et elles devraient être supprimées car elle ne sont pas libres de droit. Ce sont des logos qui devraient être téléversés sur Wikipédia avec la licence Marque déposée, dans la Catégorie:Image non libre de logo, dans le but d'être lié à une page Wikipédia. --StéphanieLagueux (talk) 18:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Invalid date ruwiki.png

Illustration of an irrelevant Media Viewer bug used only at the extension talk page. U-leo (talk) 18:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikibreak-ads.gif

Banner for Russian Wikipedia ads template. Unused after template deletion. U-leo (talk) 18:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2012 St. Louis Skating Club Logo.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no permission (No permission since) Sreejith K (talk) 19:46, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Falls below the TOO in the United States. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 21:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moulin de Nouilhan (Hautes-Pyrénées) 1.jpg

demande que la photo soit supprimée par le propriétaire Sotos (talk) 20:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete La proporiétaire écrit à l'équipe de soutien, par Ticket:2024081410008639, que la photo soit prise de son domaine privé. Le bâtiment a été photographié de près avec un grand angle (18 mm). Cela plaide en faveur de sa version. – The owner has written to the support team per Ticket:2024081410008639, claiming that the photo was taken from her private ground. Considering that the photo was taken with wide angle (18 mm) from short distance, her claim seems plausible. --Mussklprozz (talk) 07:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but there's no right on the picture of one's own property. The image doesn't have any privacy issues. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:50, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PaterMcFly, you are missing the point. We may use photos of private property taken from public ground. Yet this photo was taken illegally by breaching into private ground. We may not use photos that were taken in breach of the law. Mussklprozz (talk) 12:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, "we" don't need to care here, the uploader would, as this is a Non-copyright restriction. It is similar to taking a picture in a museum where photography is not allowed (see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#MUSEUM). PaterMcFly (talk) 13:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are right on two points: 1. The photographer must care. 2. This is not a copyright issue. – The rest of your statement is misguided. The situation is not comparable to taking a picture in a museum. It is not about a relation between two parties only. It is about a possible breach of law. French legislation applies, and the article 226-4 of the French Penal Code penalizes the breaking into a private property. A good that has been acquired unlawfully may not be used. This, of course, also applies to third parties: we (!) may not use a picture that was taken during a break-in.

The question is now: did such break-in take place? Following some correspondence with both the landlady and with a lawyer friend who is familiar with French law it is now clear that it hasn't. The key point is that the premises must be enclosed: by a fence, a wall, or at least by a sign prohibiting unauthorized access. Only under such conditions does French law consider it to be a break-in. The owner was so honest as to admit in her last letter to the support team that such a barrier did not exist when the photo was taken.

We can thus keep the image. Deletion by courtesy might be an option, since it was the photographer himself who started the request.

Cheers, --Mussklprozz (talk) 18:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy deletions aren't supposed to be done when a file is COM:INUSE, I believe, but of course the closing admin can do whatever they want... -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rodriguez-Calero sq portrait.jpg

This is a photo taken by Rodriguez Calero. 186.175.179.97 20:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arcadia Olenska Petryshyn BW.jpg

Not an own work. 186.175.179.97 20:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arcadia Olenska Petryshyn, Night Cacti I, oil on canvas 1982 72" x 106".jpg

Artist died in 96. 186.175.179.97 20:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rodriguez Calero.jpg

Is the uploader her? How do we know? 186.175.179.97 20:23, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rodrigo Piva.jpg

Copyvio! 186.175.179.97 20:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Епископ Переславский Дамиан (Воскресенский).jpg

No proof of anonymous publication; no proof of license from the copyright holder. PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Who did you identify as the creator and the copyright holder? Tineye searched 65 billion images and found no one claiming to be the creator or claiming to be an active copyright holder. --RAN (talk) 00:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If the copyright holder is unknown, then his rights cannot be respected, and then the image is non-free and illegal. As soon as we cannot state the year of publication and the year of author's death, the image is not free. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 01:00, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You wrote: "If the copyright holder is unknown, then his rights cannot be respected, and then the image is non-free and illegal." This is absolutely wrong. The actual rule is: "This work was originally published anonymously or under a pseudonym: before January 1, 1943 and the name of the author did not become known during 50 years after publication". We have a 1925 circa image and in the absence of any contradictory Russia case law, we follow USA case law, which has an image "made public" (publication) when it leaves the custody of the creator. --RAN (talk) 02:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have no proof that this image was published. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Erlöserkirche (Bad Soden-Salmünster)

copyvio; artwork 1997; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 14:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The second is de minimis. --Zenwort (talk) 12:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; the artwork is very prominent in the second picture, too, certainly not de minimis. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Erlöserkirche (Bad Soden-Salmünster)

Church built in the 1960s, interior not covered by FOP.

Didym (talk) 21:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:Bad Soden Erlöserkirche Schmidt Orgel.jpg and File:Evang. Erlöserkirche Bad Soden - Mebold Orgel.jpg. There are no substantive architectural elements or decorative artworks shown. These images just show an organ, which is a utilitarian object. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the case of the two pictures File:Evang. Erlöserkirche Bad Soden - Altarraum.jpg and File:Evang. Erlöserkirche Bad Soden - Kirchenraum.jpg, I can well imagine that it is due to the glass artwork. However, I see no reason to delete the other pictures because they only show organs, benches and windows which are in no way protected by copyright. FauleBirne 007 (talk) 22:22, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hess Fire.webm

This file was initially tagged by Fumikas Sagisavas as no license (No license since) – PD from official account or what's the issue here? Prototyperspective (talk) 21:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When I uploaded a video using V2C, I did not mark the correct authorization information of the video in time. V2C will prompt that the video from Flickr marked as public domain is not authorized, and the administrator needs to manually check the authorization information. In addition, I checked the authorization method of the source of the video and it is indeed public domain. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 22:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CESPE concurso público.jpg

This is not a logo nor own work. 200.39.139.16 22:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fix that, but why is that a deletion reason if it's a public domain image? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bandera UPE.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Rubýñ as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Bandera del partido Cantonal.jpg — billinghurst sDrewth 22:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file is close enough to duplicate, and insufficient quality to retain. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Safari regiment.png

Duplicate of File:Safari Assault Regiment.png Scu ba (talk) 23:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tavr assault police battalion.png

Duplicate of File:Tavr Battalion.png Scu ba (talk) 23:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adam Driver Marines.jpg

Firstly, the… Daily Mail… says that this photo was "© Courtesy Rodney Wright", not that Driver's step-father was a USMC member who actually took the photo.

More saliently, the US military has contracted out its portrait photography to third party companies who've retained the copyrights to their work. The USMC Recruit Depot has said that they contracted their portrait photography to Leonard's Studio in San Diego, in whom the copyrights to these photos would be vested. Further context from NARA archivist Rachael Salyer: "Usually, the instructor of a training facility paid a civilian photographer to come to the base to take pictures. These photographs sometimes are filed in the records of the unit but oftentimes they are just distributed to the individual members with no permanent copy kept. […] In addition, the 'official' photographs of individuals are not considered permanent federal records by the respective military services and are not retained in separate collections by the services." Without explicit verification that this photo was taken by a USMC member in the course of their duties, we should defer to the precautionary principle.

Lastly, we previously deleted Jack Teixeira (JPEG version).jpg, Amir Mirza Hekmati USMC.png, Monica Elfriede Witt in uniform.jpg, Shawn Nelson Army.jpg, Special Warfare Operator First Class Jonathan Y. Kim.jpg, and Travis King.webp with the same arguments. Fourthords | =Λ= | 23:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/15

August 15

Files in Category:Institut du monde arabe

Files in Category:Lactasoy

Files in Category:St. Peter und Paul (Weil am Rhein)

Fichiers de l'utilisateur:StéphanieLagueux

Files in Category:Erlöserkirche (Bad Soden-Salmünster)

Files in Category:Erlöserkirche (Bad Soden-Salmünster)

Navigation menu

Search

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.